What's new

Indian CAS tol visit BD and take salute during BMA passing out parade

It means if one does not subscribe to your ideas, he is a non-patriot. How can you claim you are the only patriot?

No that is just my opinion. You may take it or leave it. Not compulsory to agree with me.
 
.
It means if one does not subscribe to your ideas, he is a non-patriot. How can you claim you are the only patriot?

It is a natural phenomenon of those who lack confidence to use patriotism to cover up their own fears.

They loudly flaunt their patriotism and claim to be the sole patriots and others traitors!

Very natural.
 
.
Retd army officers demand probe into army chief’s age


Retired Indian Army officers on Monday asked for an independent and transparent probe into what chief of army staff General V K Singh‘s year of birth should be.

“While the age issue was never brought before me, I believe it is inconceivable that a UPSC form was accepted without any corroboration of the year of birth being 1950, as is mentioned in the Std X class certificate,” said Major General (Retd) Nalinder Kumar, who served as judge advocate-general from 2001 to 2008.

“It is also strange that a claim of the year of birth being 1951 was made almost four decades later, when rules stipulate that any discrepancy in the date of birth (DoB) should be rectified within 2 years of becoming an officer.

The unnecessary controversy at a post as high as that of the army chief, which is a institution in itself , does not speak well of the army’s and the government’s management. If the government is keen to inspire confidence, it should have an agency, not connected to the defence ministry, carry out an independent and transparent probe,” Kumar added.

Major General (Retd) Afsir Karim said the controversy should be resolved at the earliest as it was only affecting the morale of the fighting forces. “Whether 1950 or 1951, the confusion would not have arisen had the military secretary and AG’s branch cross-checked their records when Singh got his first promotion as Lt Colonel . A decision should be taken soon as it reflects on the issue of succession,” Karim said.

The issue of General Singh’s DoB arose when the law ministry accepted Singh’s DoB as May 10, 1951, ignoring documents that showed his DoB as May 10, 1950. These include a reiteration of the 2008 commitment made by Singh in November 2009 accepting 1950 as his DoB, his IMA dossier (filled up by him in January 1969), the Army List (1974-75 ) and recruiting branch particulars verified by the Intelligence Bureau. The law ministry , in its opinion dated February 14, said the 1950 entry appeared only in Singh’s NDA form and ignored the other documents that have been verified by the police.

The army refused to reply to a written query from TOI, seeking the army chief’s perspective on the issue.

https://indianmilitarynews.wordpress.com/tag/vk-singh-age-issue/
 
.
Retd army officers demand probe into army chief’s age


Retired Indian Army officers on Monday asked for an independent and transparent probe into what chief of army staff General V K Singh‘s year of birth should be.

“While the age issue was never brought before me, I believe it is inconceivable that a UPSC form was accepted without any corroboration of the year of birth being 1950, as is mentioned in the Std X class certificate,” said Major General (Retd) Nalinder Kumar, who served as judge advocate-general from 2001 to 2008.

“It is also strange that a claim of the year of birth being 1951 was made almost four decades later, when rules stipulate that any discrepancy in the date of birth (DoB) should be rectified within 2 years of becoming an officer.

The unnecessary controversy at a post as high as that of the army chief, which is a institution in itself , does not speak well of the army’s and the government’s management. If the government is keen to inspire confidence, it should have an agency, not connected to the defence ministry, carry out an independent and transparent probe,” Kumar added.

Major General (Retd) Afsir Karim said the controversy should be resolved at the earliest as it was only affecting the morale of the fighting forces. “Whether 1950 or 1951, the confusion would not have arisen had the military secretary and AG’s branch cross-checked their records when Singh got his first promotion as Lt Colonel . A decision should be taken soon as it reflects on the issue of succession,” Karim said.

The issue of General Singh’s DoB arose when the law ministry accepted Singh’s DoB as May 10, 1951, ignoring documents that showed his DoB as May 10, 1950. These include a reiteration of the 2008 commitment made by Singh in November 2009 accepting 1950 as his DoB, his IMA dossier (filled up by him in January 1969), the Army List (1974-75 ) and recruiting branch particulars verified by the Intelligence Bureau. The law ministry , in its opinion dated February 14, said the 1950 entry appeared only in Singh’s NDA form and ignored the other documents that have been verified by the police.

The army refused to reply to a written query from TOI, seeking the army chief’s perspective on the issue.

https://indianmilitarynews.wordpress.com/tag/vk-singh-age-issue/

Munchi maharaj,

How is this connected with the topic in hand?

India Bashing?

Change the title of the thread.

What is your date of birth one may ask.

In villages, in those times, there was no registration.

Therefore, it went by school registration.

If you had not gone to UK after your birth and were born in a village, who knows what your age would be as registered!

And even in the UK, they would have to accept your DOB as given.

Remember the false marriages done so that people could enter the UK and then vanish?
 
.
After Pilkhana and our knowledge of Indian plans to subjugate, undermine and exploit us how can we be a dignified nation if we allow our cadets to salute the CAS of a hostile country. India is not a friend of BD.

Instead of cribbing on international forums why aren't such grouses taken up within the country & if it cannot it should be lumped.

We S Asians love to wash our dirty linen in public.
 
.
Munchi maharaj,

How is this connected with the topic in hand?

India Bashing?

Change the title of the thread.

What is your date of birth one may ask.

In villages, in those times, there was no registration.

Therefore, it went by school registration.

If you had not gone to UK after your birth and were born in a village, who knows what your age would be as registered!

And even in the UK, they would have to accept your DOB as given.

Remember the false marriages done so that people could enter the UK and then vanish?

I was just worried you were sending us a controversial COAS to get saluted.
 
.
What has the date of birth to do with taking a salute?

Did you see that rather nice Bangladesh Recruitment video clip?

Now the chap in the field may become a BD Army Chief, but who knows whether his DOB has been registered on birth?

Would be be disqualified because his parent failed to register his DOB with the authorities?

Hardly logical!

Nice try nonetheless!
 
.
What has the date of birth to do with taking a salute?

Did you see that rather nice Bangladesh Recruitment video clip?

Now the chap in the field may become a BD Army Chief, but who knows whether his DOB has been registered on birth?

Would be be disqualified because his parent failed to register his DOB with the authorities?

Hardly logical!

Nice try nonetheless!

You Indians made it an issue I just posted it.
 
.
You Indians made it an issue I just posted it.

No issues made.

It was totally unconnected except to let out some pent up bile!

As ridiculous as posting the class results of the Chief!

Your post is the fallacy of the undistributed middle:

Milk is White.
Stork is White.
Therefore, Milk is Stork!! :rofl:
 
. . .
Long Live Indo-BD friendship'

Two hands are needed to make a clap. India wants to make a loud clap in only thin air without the presence of the other hand. By the way, do not get swayed by ths AL salute gesture. AL govt is eagerly buying military hardwares from China while allowing Indian CAS to receive a salute.
 
.
What friendship, you talking about? I don't see much going by this board.

The friendly relation is there in the diplomatic level.The present ruling party of Bangladesh,Awami League comes with a host of joint ventures and business proposals with India.

The opposition party also doesnt want to be left alone:

BNP wants good ties with India

So,the relationship is not in an individual level...
 
.
A pathetic syllogism. Stop pretending to be an intellectual. You are just a moron in disguise.

My Exposé got your goat?

I have no pretensions towards being an 'intellectual', for after all, I am not a one book wonder!

I am merely aware of the situation, as any common educated man would be. It gives me insight and maybe the capability to see through charades, which when exposed, rattle those who attempt to pose as intellectuals.

I would not like to use your harsh word 'moron', but it would be worth introspection as to whether it was in that realm to link the taking of a salute at a military academy to the date of birth of a person taking the salute.

I fail to see the connection unless it was just to activate bile and do some India bashing to ease the pain!

Your contention does fall within the ambit of the fallacy of the undistributed middle.

Peace go with you, Mushi maharaj!
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom