What's new

Indian BSF stopped firing first. So credit goes to them

.
Hey guys,

the latest from the LOC/IB.

whatever is the reason, Indians stopped first. then Pakistanis stopped.

So the credit goes to Indians for lowering the noice level.

let's hope for peace on the border and peace in the region.

Amen

give source...you are a think tank so be responsible to place facts and evidence..
@Fulcrum15 @WebMaster please check this thread which has been opend without any source or evidence
 
Last edited:
.
oh yeah i also forgot

asking your jawans to dress up and desguise as mujahideens as they dont have HIMMAT / AUKAAT to attack under the army banner

Indian gov did the same thing over and over and over.

Dressing up Indian military jawans and officers as locals.

My favorite general Manekshaw described in detail. Heck he even gave the Indian code name for the 60,000 Indian insurgents. He called them Shah beg bahini.


Please read history a bit sir.
 
.
Hey guys,

the latest from the LOC/IB.

whatever is the reason, Indians stopped first. then Pakistanis stopped.

So the credit goes to Indians for lowering the noice level.

let's hope for peace on the border and peace in the region.

Amen
you do consider your self loyal to pakistan right??
they started it so of course they had to stop it.
 
.
NDLS congressi hai so Indian Pappu.

ab is baat pe ladai nahin ki kaun sa Pappu zyada bada Pappu hai. Both are awesome in their own ways.

yaara

when a congressi has a point, we should give credit.

We should not be 100% partisans.

which pappu - indian pappu or pakistani pappu ?


pappu is a puppu is a puppu.

It is global phenomenon now. :lol:
 
. . .
Indian gov did the same thing over and over and over.

Dressing up Indian military jawans and officers as locals.

My favorite general Manekshaw described in detail. Heck he even gave the Indian code name for the 60,000 Indian insurgents. He called them Shah beg bahini.


Please read history a bit sir.

dressing up as local

dressing up as Mujaheedeen

that is a different thing

mukti vahini has the local bangla population in it while not the same case in 99
 
.
Hey, Modi and his ministers were exposed as a bunch or immature, ranting and raving hate-mongers during this conflict, while the Pakistani government acted maturely, issued mature statements in support of peace and maintaining the ceasefire, involved the UN and invited independent observers to observe the situation and validate the Pakistani version of events.

Given all of the above, I am pretty satisfied with how Pakistan handled the situation, and kudos to Nawaz Sharif (of whom I am not a big fan) for how he handled it.
Let me bring some facts to your notice.

Pakistan did not got to UN when last LOC was on fire
NS was still the PM.
This anomaly can be that PA got its *** kicked and ran to UN. So given the facts, Pakistan did chicken out seeing that there was no backing down from the Indian side like before when they did not feel the need to approach UN. :lol:
 
.
Let me bring some facts to your notice.

Pakistan did not got to UN when last LOC was on fire
NS was still the PM.
This anomaly can be that PA got its *** kicked and ran to UN. So given the facts, Pakistan did chicken out seeing that there was no backing down from the Indian side like before when they did not feel the need to approach UN. :lol:


you my dear

Ignore the statements by BSF in OP,

How on earth an army can get $hit kicked out with mere mortars?

Perhaps there is no limit to Modi-fied delusions.
 
.
No. It's not much different. There are officers deputed here as well, but the foot soldiers make a huge difference.

Don't make a mistake - BSF is not cowardly or anything. Just tactically not upto the mark and hence suffers unnecessarily high losses.

@JAT BALWAN can help.

Situation of BSF is a bit different, deputation of JCO's or CO is not a regular rutine... yes they get help from mil. intel & follow their instructions in many orders cos things are very much interconnected.

As for coward point, it's hillarious to even think that a force which is named "Border Security Force" act a bit less brave.Man they roam openly on the border in the sight of enemy which is non pridictable & face the sudden wave of offence, how can a coward do that?

BSF is a very well trained force & they showed their bravedo on wars many times.
 
.
Then why did Modi sahib go to a non-functioning body?

time-waste?

Perhaps he should just join PDF. :lol:
well...not necessary that we play smart a$$, no?? the context is about the conflict resolution...can u please enlighten me about some significant success of UN in this matter??
 
.
India is developing and is moving in the right track, a war could've slowed us down. Its avoided for all I care.
 
. .
you my dear
Ignore the statements by BSF in OP,
How on earth an army can get $hit kicked out with mere mortars?
Perhaps there is no limit to Modi-fied delusions.

Bro, i believe we should not get into the symantics of getting a$$ kicked and blah blah....I believe the objectives of the flare up were either achieved or got lost due to prolonged fire from both sides and law of diminishing returns kicking in...

if the objective was to put a death nail to any chance of talks for some time then that objective has been met...however if the objective was to check Modi's government resolve and the limit it will go ....then it kind of backfired a bit...I am not sure what is your take on it but ceasefire favors India far more that Pakistan, so if you see GOI response for similar flare up during UPA goverment they were a bit meek(till beheading occurred)..whereas during Modi the response is way more aggressive..we have seen a similar response with China a few weeks back...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom