dadeechi
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2015
- Messages
- 4,281
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Not at all.
We have been contained by both the enemy superpowers during the Cold War. First we fought the USA + 16 of her allies in the Korean War (pushing them into the longest retreat in the history of the American armed forces), then we fought directly against the USSR during the Sino-Soviet split.
It's much easier to deal with and understand pawns of the superpowers than it is to understand a truly independent country.
And it's not new news either:
India pleaded for US help against China in 1962 - Times of India
India as an independent power would have been a true competitor, an American pawn on the other hand is just business as usual.
You conclusion may be correct but not your reasoning
Let's assume China always considered India to be a non-independent state as you claim by posting India's request for US help in 1962. With this as the basis china has already factored in India as a rival/threat & adopted the string of pearls strategy on India which resulted in India fully embracing US now (but this was already factored by China). So from China's perspective, Why would US & India fighting China as a combined force better than US and India fighting China Independently ?
The primary reason it would be good for China is not because India has allied with US but because by fully embracing US, India has forsaken Russia which would now be compelled to fully embrace China and Pakistan.