What's new

Indian army kills man trapped in rubble after finding out he's Muslim

Status
Not open for further replies.
The people who are saying this video is of an operation and they really wanted to kill the guy should watch this video again. For those pretending to not understand the content I'll write it down here:

Victim: Bachao, Nikalo mujhe (Save me, pull me out)
Army officer A: haan haan nikaal rahay hain (Yes, yes, we're pulling you out)
Army officer B: Yeh toh Daari wala hai (He's a guy with a beard)
Army Officer C: Daari wala hai? (He has a beard?)

They shoot him then.

IF they had intended to blow up a house of militants, they wouldn't have then come to rescue them. This is clearly the case of Indian army going around saving only hindus of an area and killing the rest as fake militant encounters as it is their standard practice and has been proven on a number of occassions. Shame on them and they must be punished.


You know, very little surprises me here. This however takes the cake. How you guys live with yourselves putting out such unadulterated rubbish is beyond me. So soldiers come to mount rescue operations fully armed? If this is Kashmir & all Hindus have been forced out, how is the army rescuing "only Hindus"..?


Btw, the soldier said ..."Wohi dari wala hai"...You don't need me to translate that, do you?

you keep throwing these terms around ike COIN, SOP.....yet no clue on their relevance....:lol:


so where is this SOP stated, or what body has defined it?

What part is difficult to understand? SOP in counter terrorism stated? Really? Just read up man, read up.
 
The people who are saying this video is of an operation and they really wanted to kill the guy should watch this video again. For those pretending to not understand the content I'll write it down here:

Victim: Bachao, Nikalo mujhe (Save me, pull me out)
Army officer A: haan haan nikaal rahay hain (Yes, yes, we're pulling you out)
Army officer B: Yeh toh Daari wala hai (He's a guy with a beard)
Army Officer C: Daari wala hai? (He has a beard?)

They shoot him then.

IF they had intended to blow up a house of militants, they wouldn't have then come to rescue them. This is clearly the case of Indian army going around saving only hindus of an area and killing the rest as fake militant encounters as it is their standard practice and has been proven on a number of occassions. Shame on them and they must be punished.


Was the dari-wala a local mujhhideen commander? were there any threats associated with pulling this man out of debris? Is it a possibility that even in distress, mujhideen would have posed danger to the lives of army personnel try to rescue him?

Was the operation aimed at killing all the insurgents? Without knowing the objective of the operations, it is pointless to discuss anything further.

As far as legality, there have been no known actions taken by Indian Army for this, hence presumably this action was well within the scope of the mission.
 
Was the dari-wala a local mujhhideen commander? were there any threats associated with pulling this man out of debris? Is it a possibility that even in distress, mujhideen would have posed danger to the lives of army personnel try to rescue him?

Was the operation aimed at killing all the insurgents? Without knowing the objective of the operations, it is pointless to discuss anything further.

As far as legality, there have been no known actions taken by Indian Army for this, hence presumably this action was well within the scope of the mission.

How would we know? We clearly see when IA could have arrested and taken him to court as they claim he was a militant then there could have been a trial and it could have been proven in a court of law. You and me both know IA in Kashmir has a history of lying and they would have lost the case. As of now its a guy killed for being a daari wala. Someone whom they were first trying to help but then changed their minds when seeing he's a daari wala.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom