What's new

Indian Air Force News & Discussions

firstly what China field has no impact on pakistan you will.fight with your modest air power be it mirages or thunders.or f16 if they still.work in future .

second mki is not in service 3 decades the first batch of mki arrived in 2004.

we intend starting mlu in 2024 ie 2 decade point

the Russian bvrs have already been.upgraded to new variants with better seekers and range and Astra integrated since 2019.

finally comparing a f16 block.30.with mki beast is a joke

since f16 block 30 has no pesa radar no.hmd no tvc no.hobs missle they would be cannon fodder

More you post crap, the more desperate you get. China has a massive impact on the Indian Air Force (check out title of this thread, may surprise you).

" After two years of evaluation and negotiations, on 30 November 1996, India signed a US$1.462 billion deal with Sukhoi for 50 Russian-produced Su-30MKIs in five batches. "

No go to sleep.
 
More you post crap, the more desperate you get. China has a massive impact on the Indian Air Force (check out title of this thread, may surprise you).

" After two years of evaluation and negotiations, on 30 November 1996, India signed a US$1.462 billion deal with Sukhoi for 50 Russian-produced Su-30MKIs in five batches. "

No go to sleep.


you just got humiliated by me with you lies
deal.was signed in 1996
they do not deliver jets the following day
the first base line su30k arrived in 1999
the first mki in 2004 after years,of improvements

1996 was they deal.
we agreed Rafale 2017 delivery 2021 so your 30 year old tech jibe is green eyed jealousy...

second that comparison with a vintage 1980S era block 30 f16 is pitiful heck even the mighty Jordanians are scrapping their old f16s
we evaluated the f16 it's rubbish went for Rafale because we did our home work.

you constantly jibe and look.for negatives.with China this and China that
you are a Pakistani.. the chinease will.not help you. they have a lot but it means nothing to India v pakistan

you have your 50 year mirages and second tier chinease and vintage f16 .that's it
there's nothing else

of course you have the 30.mighty block 3 Coming soon or was it in 3 years time
 
you just got humiliated by me with you lies
deal.was signed in 1996
they do not deliver jets the following day
the first base line su30k arrived in 1999
the first mki in 2004 after years,of improvements

1996 was they deal.
we agreed Rafale 2017 delivery 2021 so your 30 year old tech jibe is green eyed jealousy...

second that comparison with a vintage 1980S era block 30 f16 is pitiful heck even the mighty Jordanians are scrapping their old f16s
we evaluated the f16 it's rubbish went for Rafale because we did our home work.

you constantly jibe and look.for negatives.with China this and China that
you are a Pakistani.. the chinease will.not help you. they have a lot but it means nothing to India v pakistan

you have your 50 year mirages and second tier chinease and vintage f16 .that's it
there's nothing else

of course you have the 30.mighty block 3 Coming soon or was it in 3 years time


Check again and stop bullshit. Every single piece of kit of SU-30 was designed in 90s. Does not make a difference when it was delivered
 
Check again and stop bullshit. Every single piece of kit of SU-30 was designed in 90s. Does not make a difference when it was delivered

you check.again.yasser rusty old f16 you worship where designed in early 1980S
the mirages you miraculously keep flying 1950s
and the technology on your thunder is nothing but second tier chinease.stuff s decade ago who themselves only just added basic tech like a hmd or real flybewire or composites to your block 3 yet to be delivered
that makes your current jf17 vintage already
 
you check.again.yasser rusty old f16 you worship where designed in early 1980S
For someone who thinks he knows so much about Fighter Jets doesn't even know that the F-16 was actually designed in the 70's.

(And yet) if memory serves, those rusty old F-16's shot down your jet a couple of years back, while the rest ran for the hills.

We'd love to send them up against your (new) mighty Rafales, but you keep insisting their presence is needed in the East. Oh well...
 
you check.again.yasser rusty old f16 you worship where designed in early 1980S
the mirages you miraculously keep flying 1950s
and the technology on your thunder is nothing but second tier chinease.stuff s decade ago who themselves only just added basic tech like a hmd or real flybewire or composites to your block 3 yet to be delivered
that makes your current jf17 vintage already


Again, easy to see why you are the forum clown, am sure another ban is around the corner.

The BARs radar is a generation older then the APG-68 and two generations behind the KLJ-7A.

The Rafale is a superb piece of kit and very modern but lets not kid ourselves about the SU-30. With no upgrades after 30 years it is nearing obsolesence....
 
Again, easy to see why you are the forum clown, am sure another ban is around the corner.

The BARs radar is a generation older then the APG-68 and two generations behind the KLJ-7A.

The Rafale is a superb piece of kit and very modern but lets not kid ourselves about the SU-30. With no upgrades after 30 years it is nearing obsolesence....


how is it older
apg68 is mechanical radar and bars is hybrid pesa and Aesa
get your facts right buddy
stop making things up
your sounding desperate
 
how is it older
apg68 is mechanical radar and bars is hybrid pesa and Aesa
get your facts right buddy
stop making things up
your sounding desperate

The APG-68 out classes the BARS in almost every area, as does the AMRAAM v the R-77.

The fact you have bestowed the title of "AMRAAM Dodgers" instead of "F-16 Killers" on the SU-30 competes not only this argument but my last post on this. Feb 27rth told us everything we want to know about the SU-30 in Indian service. bye bye clown
 
The APG-68 out classes the BARS in almost every area, as does the AMRAAM v the R-77.

The fact you have bestowed the title of "AMRAAM Dodgers" instead of "F-16 Killers" on the SU-30 competes not only this argument but my last post on this. Feb 27rth told us everything we want to know about the SU-30 in Indian service. bye bye clown


man your making things up again.
your dated old legacy f16 is destined for crap.as the usa will.no longer help you maintain them.
good luck getting weapons fit them.in future or upgrades
half measures,will be needed from.turkey
it's like taking your bmw for service to the Honda garage
lol.
compromised you better get the j10 quick.
or your relying on the thunders only and they don't even.have helmet mounted display and carry a old mechanical.vintage chinease radar
 
The APG-68 out classes the BARS in almost every area, as does the AMRAAM v the R-77.

The latest radar upgrade for the F-16E is the AESA APG-80 and although more advanced it’s not a clear cut better radar than the Su-30MKI’s N011M BARS. It’s advantages are low probability of intercept, more resistance to jamming and eliminating the need for a separate radar warning receiver.

But the APG-80 has a detection range of 110km against RCS size of 1m2, about half that of the N011M BARS which is 192km to 216km expressed in nautical miles as 104nm and 117nm in chart below.

1628255231268.png

1628255247076.png

As the list above shows, there is a significant difference in radar detection range. The F-16E has a radar cross section of 1.2m2 when clean so the figure on the chart very much applies. The N011M should be able to detect it at around 200km. The Su-30MKI on the other hand has a radar cross section of 4m2 and should be detected by the APG-80 at less than 165km.
1628255295586.png


The Elta ELL-8222 jammer on the Su-30MKI would definitely further reduce the APG-80’s detection range. Scanning with different frequencies, also known as frequency hopping can only be so effective when the jammer has receivers which identify (if it can) what signal the radar has switched to. This comes to about 50km advantage in detection range for the Su-30MKI.

AGP-80 also has a smaller field of view, N011M can scan upto +/-70 degree in azimuth and +/- 45 degree in vertical axis, also it can be mechanically steered to +/-55 degree off bore-sight, thus giving the pilot a full +/-100 degree off bore-sight forward hemispherical coverage.

ECM/Jamming:

The Su-30MKI’s Elta ELL-8222 spot jammer pod is much more effective than the ALQ-165 barrage jammer used by F-16. A barrage jammer like this and the Growler, operates over a very wide band of frequencies with the added benefit covering more than one type of emitter; for example the on board radar in multiple attacking aircraft and the seeker head of incoming ARH missiles. Spot jammers use a set of receivers to ID a signal and then tune emitter to that frequency and jam away. The receivers therefore allow you to narrow down on the frequency of your jamming apparatus and enable you to focus much larger power in a narrower band for maximum effect. The Elta ELL-8222 also has a much higher power output.
The APG-68 out classes the BARS in almost every area, as does the AMRAAM v the R-77.


Check again and stop bullshit. Every single piece of kit of SU-30 was designed in 90s. Does not make a difference when it was delivered
The Su30 MKI carries a beast of a radar in the BARS (or in some cases the Zhuk) with a huge range and multiple tracking capabilities. Plus add the IRST, FLIR, Litening, etc, and you have a capable machine.
The APG-68 out classes the BARS in almost every area, as does the AMRAAM v the R-77.
 
yasser thinks we Indians are stupid
he tried to compare mechanical.old apg68 radar against a double the size pesa radar on mki.
the bars mki radar can track 200k.m.and see 15 targets,take on 4 same time
even look in rear to 60km.

he then tried to suggest the r77 was rubbish missle not realising India acquired up to 1000 new Russian r77ve and r27et bvrs with new seekers,and superior performance in.2020
he thinks our air Force is sitting idle on our back sides after Feb 2019

it's paf that sits idle not India
 
The latest radar upgrade for the F-16E is the AESA APG-80 and although more advanced it’s not a clear cut better radar than the Su-30MKI’s N011M BARS. It’s advantages are low probability of intercept, more resistance to jamming and eliminating the need for a separate radar warning receiver.

But the APG-80 has a detection range of 110km against RCS size of 1m2, about half that of the N011M BARS which is 192km to 216km expressed in nautical miles as 104nm and 117nm in chart below.

View attachment 767796
View attachment 767797
As the list above shows, there is a significant difference in radar detection range. The F-16E has a radar cross section of 1.2m2 when clean so the figure on the chart very much applies. The N011M should be able to detect it at around 200km. The Su-30MKI on the other hand has a radar cross section of 4m2 and should be detected by the APG-80 at less than 165km.
View attachment 767798

The Elta ELL-8222 jammer on the Su-30MKI would definitely further reduce the APG-80’s detection range. Scanning with different frequencies, also known as frequency hopping can only be so effective when the jammer has receivers which identify (if it can) what signal the radar has switched to. This comes to about 50km advantage in detection range for the Su-30MKI.

AGP-80 also has a smaller field of view, N011M can scan upto +/-70 degree in azimuth and +/- 45 degree in vertical axis, also it can be mechanically steered to +/-55 degree off bore-sight, thus giving the pilot a full +/-100 degree off bore-sight forward hemispherical coverage.

ECM/Jamming:

The Su-30MKI’s Elta ELL-8222 spot jammer pod is much more effective than the ALQ-165 barrage jammer used by F-16. A barrage jammer like this and the Growler, operates over a very wide band of frequencies with the added benefit covering more than one type of emitter; for example the on board radar in multiple attacking aircraft and the seeker head of incoming ARH missiles. Spot jammers use a set of receivers to ID a signal and then tune emitter to that frequency and jam away. The receivers therefore allow you to narrow down on the frequency of your jamming apparatus and enable you to focus much larger power in a narrower band for maximum effect. The Elta ELL-8222 also has a much higher power output.

The Su30 MKI carries a beast of a radar in the BARS (or in some cases the Zhuk) with a huge range and multiple tracking capabilities. Plus add the IRST, FLIR, Litening, etc, and you have a capable machine.

The Bars is powerful but very suseptible to ECM, especially as it has not had any upgrades in 30 years.
The ELL-8222 was a good system back in the day but again, very long in the tooth. Unsure anyone other then India uses it.

Ultimately the BARS was unable to fire off a single missile during Feb 27th and the ELL-8222 failed to prevent multiple locks by F-16s and the destruction of a MIG-21. Theory is great, and I appreciate you feel the need to defend anything that India happens to use, but in this case it is not even a fair compariosn. There is a very very good reason both the IAF ACM and the PM of India said things would have been different with Rafales and why there was a rush for new missiles and indeed ECM straight after Feb 27th.

Check out the AN/ALQ-211(V9) and compare it to the EL-8222. Anyone with any knowledge of aviation (in this case we obviously have to excuse some of your countrymen on this forum) will tell you they are generations apart. In fact I would go so far to say that the AN/ALQ-211(V9) was probably the unsung hero of Feb 27th. Not a single one of our jets was ever threatened bu Indian missiles that day. On your side you had one loss, one fraticide and multiple jets out of the fight trying to stay alive (by your own admission), so one begs the question, what did the SU-30/BARS/EL-8222 combo achieve in real combat?

Israel moved on to the very potent EL-8251. Most modern pods can collate and store new threats to update their library, the 8222 is unable to do this, it has to be done externally. Furthermore India is in the difficult position of not being able to effectively asses most Chinese sources radars and assets in training (it obviously can train against F-16s) whilst PAF can face pretty much every aircraft the IAF uses in exercises. Again, maybe something that also had an effect on Feb 27th.
 

Throw in the integration of Astra,bvr
arrival of Rafale
and s400 from November onwards

India has not sat on.its arse..since Feb 2019
 
The Bars is powerful but very suseptible to ECM, especially as it has not had any upgrades in 30 years.
The ELL-8222 was a good system back in the day but again, very long in the tooth. Unsure anyone other then India uses it.

Ultimately the BARS was unable to fire off a single missile during Feb 27th and the ELL-8222 failed to prevent multiple locks by F-16s and the destruction of a MIG-21. Theory is great, and I appreciate you feel the need to defend anything that India happens to use, but in this case it is not even a fair compariosn. There is a very very good reason both the IAF ACM and the PM of India said things would have been different with Rafales and why there was a rush for new missiles and indeed ECM straight after Feb 27th.

Check out the AN/ALQ-211(V9) and compare it to the EL-8222. Anyone with any knowledge of aviation (in this case we obviously have to excuse some of your countrymen on this forum) will tell you they are generations apart. In fact I would go so far to say that the AN/ALQ-211(V9) was probably the unsung hero of Feb 27th. Not a single one of our jets was ever threatened bu Indian missiles that day. On your side you had one loss, one fraticide and multiple jets out of the fight trying to stay alive (by your own admission), so one begs the question, what did the SU-30/BARS/EL-8222 combo achieve in real combat?

Israel moved on to the very potent EL-8251. Most modern pods can collate and store new threats to update their library, the 8222 is unable to do this, it has to be done externally. Furthermore India is in the difficult position of not being able to effectively asses most Chinese sources radars and assets in training (it obviously can train against F-16s) whilst PAF can face pretty much every aircraft the IAF uses in exercises. Again, maybe something that also had an effect on Feb 27th.

Here is a rough timeline of what happened that day. All times are approximate, and to repeat - this is my interpretation.

9:45 AM: The IAF is maintaining Combat Air Patrols over J&K. Two Mirage 2000 aircraft are on CAP in the north. Two Su-30 MKI are on CAP in the south. Apart from these, other aircraft are on quick reaction alert, primarily Mig-21 Bisons.

9:50 AM: The PAF begins execution of its plan. Its aircraft take off from a number of bases. They are probably picked up by Indian long range radars soon after, and alerts are sounded.

9:55 AM: The IAF scrambles its quick reaction aircraft. Two Mig 21 Bisons start take-off rolls.

10:00 AM: In the north, a force of PAF JF-17s and Mirage IIIs or Vs (let’s call them Flight 1) fly towards the Line of Control. The Mirage 2000 CAP aircraft turn towards the threat. Both sets of aircraft attempt to gain locks on each other.

10:00 AM: In the south, PAF F-16 aircraft (let’s call them Flight 2) hurtle towards the LOC, flying at high altitudes and high speeds. The Su-30 MKIs prepare to engage.

10:00 AM: A third set of PAF aircraft (Flight 3), again F-16s, fly low and slower, backing up the first set of F-16s.

10:02 AM: Neither the JF-17s (Flight 1) nor the Mirage 2000 gain firing solutions on each other. Each set of aircraft begins BVR maneuvers, without crossing the border.

10:02 AM: The PAF F-16s (Flight 2) gain locks on the Su-30 MKIs, and fire their BVR missiles at extreme range. At this range, it is relatively easier for the Su-30s to evade these missiles, and accordingly, they begin to take evasive action, including using their jammers.

10:03 AM: Having fired their missiles and guided them part-way, the F-16s of Flight 2 go cold, i.e. they turn back and accelerate hard away from the fight, to return to their bases.

10:03 AM: Unable to gain firing solutions, the JF-17s and Mirages of Flight 1 now disengage, turning away from the Mirage 2000s. They do not cross the LoC, and the Indians do not pursue them across the LoC.

10:04 AM: The Su-30s finish evasive maneuvers, and turn back towards the F-16s of Flight 2. By this time, the F-16s are moving away from them at high speed, so the Su-30s have no hope of gaining a good firing solution. They do not fire their missiles, and they do not chase them across the LoC, though they are close.

10:04 AM: The second set of F-16s, Flight 3, now prepares to join the fight. Some of them release air-to-ground guided weapons, which hit Indian territory, but do not do any damage. The other F-16s prepare to engage the Su-30 MKIs, who are trying to engage the F-16s of Flight 2. If they can lock the Su-30s and fire their BVR missiles, they have a decent chance of shooting down one - which would be a major psychological victory for the PAF.

10:05 AM: The IAF Mig-21s arrive on the scene, and are picked up by the F-16s of Flight 3. This is a surprise for the F-16s, since the MiGs were flying low, in the radar shadow of a mountain range, and were trying to gain altitude. The F-16s now leave the Su-30s alone, and instead hurriedly turn to engage this new threat.

10:06 AM: One of the Mig-21s turns away, to evade a radar lock from a F-16. The other Mig (Cdr. Varthaman) continues straight ahead to engage the F-16s.

10:07 AM: An F-16 fires a missile which shoots down the Mig-21 flown by Cdr. Varthaman. He is taken prisoner. The IAF claims that before being shot down, he fired at and shot down an F-16. The PAF denies this.

10:09 AM: The engagement is over.

So, you see, the entire thing probably lasted about 15 minutes, despite all this action. There wasn’t enough time for additional IAF aircraft to join the fight. The Su-30 MKIs were involved, and did engage.

Again, do note that “engagement” doesn’t mean a dogfight. For the Pakistanis, their objective was to prevent the Mirage 2000s and the Su-30 MKIs from interfering with Flight 3, which they did, through a reasonably complex plan. I don’t think they wanted to get into a fight with the Su-30s!

For the IAF, their objective was to guard their airspace, which they did against superior number of attacking aircraft, without crossing the LOC.
 
Here is a rough timeline of what happened that day. All times are approximate, and to repeat - this is my interpretation.

9:45 AM: The IAF is maintaining Combat Air Patrols over J&K. Two Mirage 2000 aircraft are on CAP in the north. Two Su-30 MKI are on CAP in the south. Apart from these, other aircraft are on quick reaction alert, primarily Mig-21 Bisons.

9:50 AM: The PAF begins execution of its plan. Its aircraft take off from a number of bases. They are probably picked up by Indian long range radars soon after, and alerts are sounded.

9:55 AM: The IAF scrambles its quick reaction aircraft. Two Mig 21 Bisons start take-off rolls.

10:00 AM: In the north, a force of PAF JF-17s and Mirage IIIs or Vs (let’s call them Flight 1) fly towards the Line of Control. The Mirage 2000 CAP aircraft turn towards the threat. Both sets of aircraft attempt to gain locks on each other.

10:00 AM: In the south, PAF F-16 aircraft (let’s call them Flight 2) hurtle towards the LOC, flying at high altitudes and high speeds. The Su-30 MKIs prepare to engage.

10:00 AM: A third set of PAF aircraft (Flight 3), again F-16s, fly low and slower, backing up the first set of F-16s.

10:02 AM: Neither the JF-17s (Flight 1) nor the Mirage 2000 gain firing solutions on each other. Each set of aircraft begins BVR maneuvers, without crossing the border.

10:02 AM: The PAF F-16s (Flight 2) gain locks on the Su-30 MKIs, and fire their BVR missiles at extreme range. At this range, it is relatively easier for the Su-30s to evade these missiles, and accordingly, they begin to take evasive action, including using their jammers.

10:03 AM: Having fired their missiles and guided them part-way, the F-16s of Flight 2 go cold, i.e. they turn back and accelerate hard away from the fight, to return to their bases.

10:03 AM: Unable to gain firing solutions, the JF-17s and Mirages of Flight 1 now disengage, turning away from the Mirage 2000s. They do not cross the LoC, and the Indians do not pursue them across the LoC.

10:04 AM: The Su-30s finish evasive maneuvers, and turn back towards the F-16s of Flight 2. By this time, the F-16s are moving away from them at high speed, so the Su-30s have no hope of gaining a good firing solution. They do not fire their missiles, and they do not chase them across the LoC, though they are close.

10:04 AM: The second set of F-16s, Flight 3, now prepares to join the fight. Some of them release air-to-ground guided weapons, which hit Indian territory, but do not do any damage. The other F-16s prepare to engage the Su-30 MKIs, who are trying to engage the F-16s of Flight 2. If they can lock the Su-30s and fire their BVR missiles, they have a decent chance of shooting down one - which would be a major psychological victory for the PAF.

10:05 AM: The IAF Mig-21s arrive on the scene, and are picked up by the F-16s of Flight 3. This is a surprise for the F-16s, since the MiGs were flying low, in the radar shadow of a mountain range, and were trying to gain altitude. The F-16s now leave the Su-30s alone, and instead hurriedly turn to engage this new threat.

10:06 AM: One of the Mig-21s turns away, to evade a radar lock from a F-16. The other Mig (Cdr. Varthaman) continues straight ahead to engage the F-16s.

10:07 AM: An F-16 fires a missile which shoots down the Mig-21 flown by Cdr. Varthaman. He is taken prisoner. The IAF claims that before being shot down, he fired at and shot down an F-16. The PAF denies this.

10:09 AM: The engagement is over.

So, you see, the entire thing probably lasted about 15 minutes, despite all this action. There wasn’t enough time for additional IAF aircraft to join the fight. The Su-30 MKIs were involved, and did engage.

Again, do note that “engagement” doesn’t mean a dogfight. For the Pakistanis, their objective was to prevent the Mirage 2000s and the Su-30 MKIs from interfering with Flight 3, which they did, through a reasonably complex plan. I don’t think they wanted to get into a fight with the Su-30s!

For the IAF, their objective was to guard their airspace, which they did against superior number of attacking aircraft, without crossing the LOC.


Forgive me but I stopped reading after the first line, any timeline you give is obviously from Indian sources and much of it made up from flimsey evidence at best, outright lies at worst.

Best to go to neutral sources, non Indian and non Pakistani. All of whom seem to support the Pakistani narrative.

Let's simply look at what actual EVIDENCE we have.

1) A wreckage of a AMRAAM, not a whole missile but a fragment, that was found extremely quickly in very mountanious terrain by India. This missile either exploded into tiny bits and was found by a miracle or was emmbeded into an IAF plane or at a crash site. No answers from IAF on this.

2) IAF Air Defence radar was so confused that it shot down a MI-17. The official explanation was that the IFF was off. This indicates that Indian Air Defence radar could not identify it anyway and that Indian AEW aircraft were not able to communicate it's location either.

3) 3 seperate videos showing Indian Brigade HQs targeted, then all three aiming systems deliberately all moved the cross hairs to approx 2 km right of the target. All three did the exact same thing as around the exact same time. This is on video. PAF stated this was deliberate, India states all three missed. I will leave you to judge.

4) MIG-21 wreckage and pilot captured with 4 missiles intact. This proves that no firing solution by the MIG-21

5) A media video interview of an IAF air defence controller in which she admits that heavy jamming led to severe communication between IAF controllers and IAF aircraft. Safe to say that this jamming was not limited to just the MIG-21s (which were also carrying the EL-8222 pod).

6) Statements by the IAF ACM claiming the outcome "would have been different" had IAF had Meteors and Rafales, if that is not a damning inductment of the SU-30/R-77 combo I do not know what it. No such statement on aircraft types, missiles or outcomes was ever given by the PAF ACM.

A non Pakistani and non Indian sources gives an excellent account below, Alan Warnes is Editor in Chief of Air Forces Monthly and covered the PAF for many years (which naturally makes him a victim of much hatred by Indians on social media).

Bits I can qoute also are

" The IAF is already talking about upgrading the radars of its Su-30MKIs with an active electronically scanned array (AESA) to provide increased situational awareness. Longer-term, the IAF will operate the Rafale and the Meteor, perhaps the best BVR air-to-air missile in the world. "

"The air battle saw five of the IAF’s agile MiG-21bisUPG Bisons of No 51 Squadron from Srinigar AFS being scrambled. They should have been working with the Su-30MKIs and their more powerful N011M Bars passive electronically scanned array (PESA) radars. The Flankers were expected to data-link their longer-range aerial picture to the Bisons operating ahead of them, allowing the MiGs to keep their radars switched off to evade detection by PAF radars.

However, the degraded communications meant the Bisons weren’t receiving anything from the Sukhois or the air defence controller."

“Monitoring of the radios by the PAF revealed the pilot of a Su-30MKI had called ‘Bingo’ [low on fuel] only 25 minutes into the mission, even though it can fly up to two hours. Around the same time, two Mirage 2000s also exited the active zone after claiming their air intercept radars were broken. That was strange, because PAF F-16s had picked up telltale transmission ‘chirps’ of the apparently serviceable Mirage 2000 radar on their threat-warning systems a short time earlier.”

"Former Indian Army officer Pravin Sawhney, now an independent military analyst, was critical of the IAF: “The PAF had better electronic warfare jammers and, as a result, the IAF could not communicate. If you do not win the battle in the electromagnetic spectrum, you will never win the war.”

 
Back
Top Bottom