What's new

Indian Aggression

Status
Not open for further replies.
India liberated Goa and not invaded Goa , as Goa was always a part of India. the Britishers did not occupy Goa because they were friendly with the Portugal.

Call it what you want. call it a tea party or a dinner reservation.
The fact is that India used military force to occupy a land that was not theirs and that was not at war with them.
Under any definition that is called an invasion.

And India did it because it is an aggressive state hell bent on gaining land by any means.
The facts speak for themselves.
 
By that same logic China and Pakistan have every right to invade India.
Like I said, it doesn't matter what your reasons are, you invaded a country that was not fighting you.

As for Kashmir, The nazims of Hyderabad and a few other places acceded to Pakistan. So why didn't you allow them to go to Pakistan?

The deal with partition was that Muslim majority would to to Pakistan and Hindu majority would go to India. You betrayed that deal and chose an aggressive stance and thus became the root cause of all the problems in South Asia.
If India had allowed partition to happen according to the deal then maybe today we could have had a much better relationship and even visa free travel to each other's country.

Instead we got war and hate thanks to your actions.

Easy there Mohammed Bin Qasim :rofl:

I am so scared. Take Kashmir, Hyderabad, Goa and we will also put in Punjab and UP in the deal, but please dont invade us. Last time you did that in 1971, we lost so much territory and respect that it has been giving us nightmares ever since :rofl:
 
Mixing your carrots and peas...... since you are incompetent to comprehend, there is a different between helpless farmers and fighting soldier

Last i heard was that Pakistan is a major exporter of RICE.....but unlike our neighbour, it does lacks bonded labour and child sweat shops to boast the economy.

When your incompetency is seen, u discussing farmer issue, in the thread of Indian aggression. I am bound to reply you in your language for you to understand well.

still for your appetite, here is a link...
Suicide the only way to escape poverty? | DAWN.COM

Here is rice facts for you.........

Agriculture in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

India Emerges as a Top Rice Exporter

Child labor in pakistan...........
Millions pushed into child labor in Pakistan - World news - South and Central Asia - Pakistan - msnbc.com

Bonded labor...........
IRIN Asia | PAKISTAN: Bonded labour or education? | Pakistan | Children | Conflict | Economy | Education | Gender Issues | Health & Nutrition

I can paste many more if you want. So instead of talking crap, stick to topic....
 
Right so you did invade Hyderabad!

The nazim had a choice of Pakistan or India, he chose Pakistan and India invaded.

Why the double standards?

By your very own standards Pakistan had a right to invade Kashmir and India should not have interfered like Pakistan did not interfere with Hyderabad and the other states that chose Pakistan.

what a dumb @$$ comment..there was rebellion going on in hyderabad..a genocide was being committed by muslim razakars on majority hindu population and therefore India attacked Hyderabad.

In kashmir no such thing was happening. the only reason Kashmir issue escalated was Pakistanis did not have the patience to wait and to see what would happen. Pakistan sent out invading marauders and India entered only when the Maharaja entered into acceded to India.
 
You can turn off the images while browsing on a smartphone, that will save bandwidth if you are on a limited plan.

Anyway, it is off topic. I'm sure you'll end up reading the article eventually.

So its an article of how Indians jailed Tibetan protestors. Why does that have anything to do with what I posted? :meeting:
 
The root cause of problems in South Asia is ur unacceptability of Hindus incharge of country larger than, according to Jinnah,'a moth eaten' Pakistan. Do u really think, if we give Kashmir to u in platter all the problems will disappear? ur hero Hafizz sayeed and Zaid Hamid dream of islamizing India and cutting the heads of 800 millions hindus..so as far as we know all these are hogwash.

YES, it will.
You people created the problem by occupying Kashmir and that created strong anti India sentiment.
People like Hafizz sayeed would not exist if it wasn't for India's occupation. Look at Sri Lanka. We have great relations with them even though they are Buddhists and Hindus. There is no hatred for Sri Lanka in Pakistan. the reason for that is that Sri Lanka does not act like an aggressive state and wan't peace.
 
I liked it when in 1962 Indian tried to get aggressive with a country with a similar population and got a right Royal spanking that put an end to Nehru's forward policy.

Perhaps Chinese could be encouraged to dismember India and make our neighbourhood peaceful
 
If you are peaceful then why did you invade Goa?

The fact is that you are no peaceful, you are fully willing to use force to get your way.

Being from Goa i would like to say India never Invaded Goa it was portuguese colonisation over goa for 450 ,India finally freed us from the portuguese and Goa became a state of Independent India ... even b4 the portuguese rule goa was a part of India but India india itself was fighting hard to get independence from the british rule.
 
I liked it when in 1962 Indian tried to get aggressive with a country with a similar population and got a right Royal spanking that put an end to Nehru's forward policy

I liked it when Pakistan won a war against Indi ..... oh wait never mind :wave:
 
I liked it when in 1962 Indian tried to get aggressive with a country with a similar population and got a right Royal spanking that put an end to Nehru's forward policy.

Perhaps Chinese could be encouraged to dismember India and make our neighbourhood peaceful

And as of today the Indians are still whining about 1962.....Indians have been seriously hurt in the war that they lost....you know there is a saying "Time will heal all wounds" but that is not the case for India.
 
Right so you did invade Hyderabad!

The nazim had a choice of Pakistan or India, he chose Pakistan and India invaded.

Why the double standards?

By your very own standards Pakistan had a right to invade Kashmir and India should not have interfered like Pakistan did not interfere with Hyderabad and the other states that chose Pakistan.
Sounds less thanhumble coming from you.....
The nawab of balochistan also wanted to join India, but Nehru refused considering it important to Pakistan strategically........
But when it came to reciprocating the favour with Hyderabad, Pakistan chose to support the Nizam instead...
So don't you talk about Double standards!!!:disagree:
 
Pakistani Mard-E-Mujahid's surrenderring to the dark-skinned veggie-eating Hindus:


:laugh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I liked it when in 1962 Indian tried to get aggressive with a country with a similar population and got a right Royal spanking that put an end to Nehru's forward policy.

Perhaps Chinese could be encouraged to dismember India and make our neighbourhood peaceful

for an underarmed under equipped poorly fed troops outnumbered 8:1 faced with a surprised attack, i think the outcome was clear

but we have become much more powerful. as a pakistani u should know that by now
 
Right so you did invade Hyderabad!

The nazim had a choice of Pakistan or India, he chose Pakistan and India invaded.

Nizam's family still live in Secunderabad and he wanted to merge with India but his powerful Wazir Kasim Rizvi never wanted Hyderabad to merge with India. Eventually Kasim Rizvi fled to Karachi and Nizam signed accession paper after Kasim Rizvi fled. You can pay homage to Kasim Rizvi at his grave in Karachi. In Andhra Pradesh, "Razakar" is synonym of "someone oppressive and evil".

LOL Landlocked Hyderabad with 92% Hindus dreamed about independence of Hyderabad.

Anyway, "jiski jaisi kismat"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom