Featured India Will Take The Fight To The Enemy On Foreign Soil: NSA Ajit Doval Reveals Doctrine Of New India

[khansaheeb]

India Will Take The Fight To The Enemy On Foreign Soil: NSA Ajit Doval Reveals Doctrine Of New India

In a major development, National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval yesterday (25 October) said that India will not only fight on its own territory but also on the foreign soil which becomes the source of a security threat, reports Times of India.

NSA Doval emphasised that while India has never attacked anyone first, the new strategic thinking holds that perhaps we could have acted proactively to nip security threats. Summarising his doctrine of "New India", NSA Doval pressed, "India will take the battle to where the threat originates."

The strong statement by NSA Doval gains significance as it comes amid a volatile and escalated situation on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) where the Indian Army, Indian Air Force and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) forces are present in heavy capacity to deter any possible expansionist misadventures by the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA).

Also, it should be noted NSA Doval's statement appeared to many as the Government's intent to apply the doctrine of pre-emption to nip security threats, as it also came on the same day when RSS's sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat talked of China's encroachments.

NSA Doval made the strong statement while addressing the Parmarth Niketan Ashram in the holy city of Rishikesh.

India Will Take The Fight To The Enemy On Foreign Soil: NSA Ajit Doval Reveals Doctrine Of New India

In a major development, National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval yesterday (25 October) said that India will not only fight on its own territory but also on the foreign soil which becomes the source of a security threat, reports Times of India

swarajyamag.com

Yes, Soil and don't forget rivers too.

 

[Imran Khan]

haan to kesi lagi phir fight last week ?

 

[MilSpec]

Banned for supporting terror, P.S. hope you die in a worse fashion.

Vehemently agree with the sentiment. All supporting terror here should be banned, and I too hope they die in the worst fashion.

 

[Prince Kassad]

Vehemently agree with the sentiment. All supporting terror here should be banned, and I too hope they die in the worst fashion.

A freedom fighter is a terrorist on your side. A terrorist is a freedom fighter on the other side. Does it really need to be more complex? Yes, considering that the definition of freedom fighters implies that they are attacking their own governments and not someone else's -- terrorism is a method, not a political goal.