India will purchase more Israeli weapons now that BJP is back in power

[trainer]

Lolz so what i can quote you 100 articles against india and rss terrorists. never take these blog seriously p:p

Dear me I liked your signature(but in pak its a reality not sarcastic) . It reflects the pakistani psycho and ideology...

 

[Lostsoldier]

WOW.
A BLOG.



Oh please. I never thought I'd see South Asian discrimination and racism. We're literally made of the same cloth. You're insulting yourself right now.

You know 90% people in Pakistan are homeless and still they are making nukes.

 

[hunter_hunted]

Another keyboard warrior trolling lolzz grow up and learn some manner before posting bullshit

They are better known as Youtube warriors

 

[karakoram]

You know 90% people in Pakistan are homeless and still they are making nukes.

1/3 poor of the world still live india and yet they call them self supar powah

 

[Raje amar]

Guly please stay on the topic
@MOD some cleaning needed here.

 

[GURU DUTT]

Its pretty funny that India has to purchase weapons from such a small country. But these weapons could prove to be a strategic threat to Pakistan and China.

India’s Promising Israel Defense Ties | The Diplomat

India’s Promising Israel Defense Ties
Stalled on scandals, a missile deal has given the defense relationship a shot in the arm.
By Alvite Ningthoujam
October 09, 2014

In what could be considered a major breakthrough for Indo-Israeli defense ties, under the newly installed Bharatiya Janata Pary (BJP) government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India will finally get its much-needed Barak-1 missile, manufactured by the Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). This is a significant step for the new government in New Delhi, particularly considering the depleted defensive capabilities of Indian warships. With delivery scheduled for December 2015, fourteen ships that presently lack missile systems will be outfitted with the Barak-1.

Going back a little more than a decade, Indo-Israeli cooperation were derailed by allegations of bribery and corruption allegations. The issues surfaced when India’s Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) conducted a probe into IAI and Rafael regarding the supply of Barak-1 missiles, in a deal orchestrated by the then BJP-led NDA government in 2000. India’s Defence Minister at the time, George Fernandes, retired Naval Chief Admiral Sushil Kumar, and a number of others were involved in the scandal. It was discovered that the deal had been signed by Fernandes over the objections of the government’s scientific advisor and former Indian President A.P.J Abdul Kalam, and against the advice of the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO). Specifically, questions had been raised over the need to purchase Israeli missile systems when India’s indigenously built Trishul was nearly functional.

In the wake of the kickback allegations, India’s left-wing parties, particularly the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M), demanded that India refuse all deals with Israel, and particularly with IAI. In the event, neither IAI nor Rafael was blacklisted, and indeed they became two of the most important Israeli defense firms operating in India. Still, the controversies gave the political left, India’s pro-Palestinian groups, and social activists ammunition to pressure the government to curb ties with Israel in general, and defense cooperation in particular.

However, the CBI investigation was closed in December 2013, with the admission that there was no evidence against the accused, including the former defense minister, former Samata Party president Jaya Jaitly, a former navy chief, and others. This outcome has breathed new life into India-Israel defense ties, which are now an important pillar of overall bilateral ties. Criticisms notwithstanding, the two countries are working to enhance their defense cooperation, much of which involves boosting the arms trade (worth an estimated $10 billion over the last decade) and moving ahead with joint projects. The framework for the Barak missile deal was laid down by the previous Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government, although it fell short of giving the final nod to the acquisition. Last year ended on a positive note as the then government approved the procurement of up to 15 Heron Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) from Israel, which will likely bolster the reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities of Indian armed forces along the borders with Pakistan and China.

The green light that has now been given by the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), which Modi chairs, for the acquisition of 262 missiles has come much to the relief of the Indian Navy, given its rapidly dwindling stock of anti-ballistic missiles for its frontline battleships. The Indian Navy has been voicing concerns over its deficiencies, with ships operating without missile defense systems. New Delhi’s announcement of the procurement at a whopping cost of $144 million is thus a welcome move. It is also a the first major advance in Indo-Israel defense ties since Modi took power.

The BJP’s big election win earlier this year was followed by a great deal of pontification on the likely foreign policy India would adopt in its immediate neighborhood, with Western and Eastern powers, and with Middle Eastern countries. In the context of this discussion, Israel has received more than its share of attention. Apart from the economic and civilian ties India shares with Israel, many pundits believe military cooperation will also gather momentum. There are memories in New Delhi of Israel’s rapid response to India’s request for military assistance during a crisis (particularly, the 1999 Kargil War, when the BJP was in power), which increased Israel’s credibility as a reliable arms supplier and helped bolster the bilateral relationship.

While the go-ahead for the Barak deal will not in itself necessarily spark a golden age of Indo-Israel defense cooperation, it is certainly an important step in that direction. Beyond arms trade, there are several factors that would encourage the countries to cooperate. For instance, India and Israel share threat perceptions when it comes to their immediate adversaries and rising terror activities targeting them, and this will remain a binding force in their bilateral relations. Their defense establishments will be committed to robust cooperation in intelligence sharing and counterterrorism. Signaling an appetite for further engagement in military-security affairs, India’s Defence Secretary R.K. Mathur paid a three-day visit to Israel in early July, during which he discussed arms deals, including a missile development program and the procurement of two Israeli-made Airborne Early Warning and Control Systems (AWACS) for the Indian Air Force. Israel has been pushing New Delhi – as yet, without success – to procure its Iron Dome air defense system for protection against incoming short- and long-range range missile threats.

New Delhi’s clearance of the stalled Barak deal is a clear signal of India’s continuing preference for Israeli-made missile defense systems. This is one area where Israel’s presence in the Indian defense market is secure. That said, it remains as a space where competition from other foreign vendors always looms large.

The U.S. for one. America is keen to enter the Indian market. In fact, the U.S.-made Javelin missile was in a face-off with Israel’s Spike anti-tank guide missiles in a contract meant for the Indian Army. Hoping to tap the lucrative Indian defense market, the Pentagon has already demonstrated its willingness to offer “groundbreaking” defense technologies to India, including helicopters and UAVs. The Obama administration is also hoping for joint development and production of items such as drones and missiles with India, as part of the much-hyped “Defence Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI)” with New Delhi. In view of these initiatives, which are already in the discussion-stage, Modi’s recent visit to the U.S. will have been watched closely, not only by Indian defense planners but by their Israeli counterparts as well. If the U.S. succeeds in entering the Indian defense market by supplying missiles, anti-missile systems and drones, then it could well provide Israel with some stiff competition. But for this to happen, both India and the U.S. will need to overcome some entrenched issues on military technology transfer mechanisms, the main roadblock for the further enhancement of their defense cooperation. This in itself will be an enormous hurdle to conquer.

In the meantime, with their longstanding ties, defense cooperation between India and Israel looks set to grow stronger. Certainly, in the presence of heightened criticism within India over the cordial ties, and particularly the debate on India’s stance vis-à-vis the recent Gaza crisis, dealings on matters related to military affairs are likely to proceed very cautiously. But with this Barak deal, there is little chance they will be shelved.

Alvite Singh Ningthoujam is a PhD researcher at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

whats wrong in india buyinglatest and most leathel wepons from multiple sources ?

and why there should be any discrimination against israel who are known to make most cost effective and smart + leathel wepons

 

[sancho]

See, the good point is that he is allowing private sectors and barring PSUs in some defence areas.

Yes, that's why it's good that Antony started it and that the current MoD follows that policy. But it's only good when it is implemented in the right way and more importantly for the right reasons, that however is currently not the case!
Scrapping already running tenders, just to implement the policy will only benefit privat industry, while the delays that comes with the change, will badly hit the modernisation of Indian forces and the national security!
So even if we support the policy, we can't use it by ignoring that national security is more important than economy, but that's what the PM is doing here (lets be honest, he is running defence and not Arun Jaitley).

That will go a long way in research and development.

No it won't because basic licence production of a foreign LUH for ecample, won't make the Indian company to invest in R&D and develop an own helicopter. TATA is producing Sikorsky helicopter parts under licences, while that won't add any skills in R&D nor will it lead to any own helicopter development.
If we want Indian privat industry to invest in R&D, we must get them into specific tenders, that demands JVs or joint developments. For the self-propelled howitzer TATA teamed up with Denel and while the Denel gun will be basic licence production again, TATA is investing in developing not only the platform but also subsystems for the gun. Even more important is the joint development they have with DRDO for an IFV in the FICV tender, where they actually invest in R&D to develop the vehicle in India from scratch. That will actually improve their capabilities in this field for the future, but that is also what government owned companies do. Investing in R&D to develop arms and techs to provide our forces with what they need and not only licence produce something what others developed.

Getting private companies to take over licence productions is good only to increase the competition in the Indian defence industry and to take over workload from HAL, which currently is simply the only option India has in the aero sector. But for propper R&D and solutions for our forces, the government owned companies are still the main option!
One has to keep in mind that privat companies are benefit driven, that's why the current MoD faces the same problems that the former had, to get Indian privat industry into the Avro replacement tender, only because they think the cost / benefit ratio is too low. So it's not the national security that they aim on, but earing money and if a project is not beneficial enough for them, they won't join or invest. Just as they don't care for whom they produce parts, as long as enough benefits will be generated.

Btw, if the UPA had shown the same favoritism of privat companies over the forces and the national security interest, you might had been the first to complain about corruption as the most likely reason, right?
I'm not saying that this is the reason for the NDA currently, but might be simply based on their favoritism of economy over anything else, but if you would complain about it for the one party, you shouldn't simply look away now.

Guly please stay on the topic

On topic, there is nothing that will change on the interest on Israeli weapons and techs based on which Indian party is in power, since both sides now about the capabilities Israel offers. What is more important though is, to get deeper ties to Israel, independently from the US, because that is the most limiting factor in our relations to them. We want Israeli AESA (EL 2052), but since it includes US techs is can't be procured. We want Israeli interceptor missiles (Stunner), but since it includes US techs it can't be procured...
so no matter who is in charge in India, that is the key to increase defence ties to Israel!