Stephen Cohen
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Messages
- 8,456
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
This second line will be of Rafale as Made in India
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have feel that it will be a american plane: either F16 or F18.
F-16 started there MLU in 90s? What you talking about?
That not going to happen , if China was interested in resolving those then it already happened by 2013.
Also whoever said this Mk1A not going to be ready by 2024, is moron of highest order. It best ready for induction by 2019.
No, did any official statement coming from MoD about F-16? And CAS last year cleared the IAF stance about LCA, that initially they want to induct 6 squadrons that met IAF standards i.e. MK1A. Where is the ambiguity? Things are clear as hell.So do you think MOD is pressurizing HAL/ADA to issue these statements to support the procurement of F-16s?
One Line for TEJAS
Second line RAFALE ; that is all
No, did any official statement coming from MoD about F-16? And CAS last year cleared the IAF stance about LCA, that initially they want to induct 6 squadrons that met IAF standards i.e. MK1A. Where is the ambiguity? Things are clear as hell.
He said clearly, in IAF sense, there is no Mk.1 and Mk.2.But statement is about LCA MK2 which requires structural changes. LCA MK1A is marching ahead and on order. There is no ambiguity here.
He said clearly, in IAF sense, there is no Mk.1 and Mk.2.
They want 6 squadrons that is ready now.
And why? 6 squadrons are enough to replace MiG-23, MiG-27 & MiG-21?Correct. MK1A would make those 6 squadrons.
LCA Mk2 would not see the light.
Also for what G414 bought?Correct. MK1A would make those 6 squadrons.
LCA Mk2 would not see the light.
And why? 6 squadrons are enough to replace MiG-23, MiG-27 & MiG-21?
As I said earlier we would have
1st - SU-30 then FGFA (2022 or later)
2nd - LCA MK1A
3rd - RAFALEs
4th - F-16s
5th - AMCA (2030 or later)
LCA MK2 in 2024 or later does not have much significance unless they drastically change the requirements.
And why F-16? Why not Gripen NG then? Buy every single engine aircraft in world. And fuk the logistics like India done in 80s.
When there are solutions which are offered by Indian OEM, still we seeing foren? Why?
Firstly, you already assumed Mk.2 is dead. Clear that why & how it is dead? And how you assuming F-16 is chosen, any authenticity in this?So you think Gripen would be picked over F-16 because it has commonality with LCA MK1A?
How does Sweden as a country support strategic interests of India? With FGFA, RAFALE & F-16 procurements India would keep Russia, France & US (all UNSC veto members) on it's side. Sweden is a light weight actor in International politics.