India urged to take up Tibet issue before UN

[liontk]

all eurasian races are equal and thus make enemies of and kill each other on an equal basis, honorably, legally, legitimately. on that basis of morality, legality, and legitimacy, all eurasian races are superior to the rootless races (which, needless to say, encompass the racially impure like that coconut-man liontk up there who dread and fiercely oppose the healthy political enmity that exists and will always exist between eurasian races). of course, it also includes those money-makers put into concentration camps, which, by the way, often killed jews not for pleasure but when pressed by bureaucratic and logistic necessity. like i said, the crime at auschwitz started and ended with hitler's invasion of russia.



could your lord save you from your own blood? if it isn't that powerful to begin with, what makes you think your idol could contend with my intelligence, much less defeat it?

 

[iajj]

guess how many divisions are needed of these placard-holding, fed-up protestors of mixed blood biology and a multicultural ideology that they couldn't help but swallow because of their biology to save a jew from being sent to concentration camps? there are real political disagreements, animosities, conflict of political agendas and interests, that you lot refuse to confront because of your biology and ideology, which was why i despised your utterly pointless post in the very beginning. i respect indians a whole lot more than you quarter-pakistani because indians, not to mention true pakistanis, all have real political causes they want to fight for and even sacrifice their lives for. they know to be what they are they are bound to make enemies and they are bound to hate and be hated. even the tibetan lamaists were willing to barbeque themselves to make a statement of their hatred of chinese like me, and all you got to show for your mix-blood selves are those placards? at least learn from the self-barbequed tibetan occultists and learn the power of hate! then you can talk to me about politics

 

[core]

Dude Or i should say u 'My cute Little Baby'.

Always reply to the context a debate is already going on.

We were discussing WOT not economics/development or infrastructure.

Ok Auncle ...than u should also stick to topic...

 

[Jackdaws]

...and let me guess this nation must be India



You got unimportant seat in U.N, not because you don't want because you couldn't at that time ...and now live with it for ever

LOL...we've seen what you have done with the "important" U.N. seat as you call it....used the veto a grand total of 6 times including one to block Bangladesh's entry to the United Nations...we all know how well that turned out...hahahahahaha...really China is such a laughing stock...


My bad - 8 times - here is their "veto record"

As of June 2012 the PRC had used its Security Council veto eight times, fewer than other countries with the veto: in 1972 to veto the admission of Bangladesh (which it considered a rebellious province of its ally Pakistan), in 1973 (in conjunction with the Soviet Union) to veto a resolution on the ceasefire in the Yom Kippur War, in 1997 to veto ceasefire observers to Guatemala (which accepted the ROC as legitimate),[12] in 1999 to veto an extension of observers to the Republic of Macedonia (same),[13] in 2007 (in conjunction with Russia) to veto criticizing Myanmar (Burma) on its human rights record,[14] in 2008 (with Russia) to veto sanctions against Zimbabwe,[15] in 2011 (with Russia) to veto sanctions against Syria,[16] and in February 2012 (with Russia) to veto for the second time a draft resolution calling for foreign military intervention in Syria.[17]

LOL - well and truly China is on the side of world peace and contributes to human development. Supporting Mugabe, Myanmar's human rights record - lol.

 

[iajj]

LOL...we've seen what you have done with the "important" U.N. seat as you call it....used the veto a grand total of 6 times including one to block Bangladesh's entry to the United Nations...we all know how well that turned out...hahahahahaha...really China is such a laughing stock...


My bad - 8 times - here is their "veto record"

As of June 2012 the PRC had used its Security Council veto eight times, fewer than other countries with the veto: in 1972 to veto the admission of Bangladesh (which it considered a rebellious province of its ally Pakistan), in 1973 (in conjunction with the Soviet Union) to veto a resolution on the ceasefire in the Yom Kippur War, in 1997 to veto ceasefire observers to Guatemala (which accepted the ROC as legitimate),[12] in 1999 to veto an extension of observers to the Republic of Macedonia (same),[13] in 2007 (in conjunction with Russia) to veto criticizing Myanmar (Burma) on its human rights record,[14] in 2008 (with Russia) to veto sanctions against Zimbabwe,[15] in 2011 (with Russia) to veto sanctions against Syria,[16] and in February 2012 (with Russia) to veto for the second time a draft resolution calling for foreign military intervention in Syria.[17]

LOL - well and truly China is on the side of world peace and contributes to human development. Supporting Mugabe, Myanmar's human rights record - lol.

all vetoes are used for self-serving purposes: the three western powers used vetoes to cover some jewish ***** whose crimes are no less numerous than burmese junta. but that is the point of the whole design of veto power: the security council works on the premise that if the five mightiest nations would use vetoes to serve themselves on important security issues and draw a line here and there, the whole world is a safer place to live in because the most powerful countries don't have to lash out when their vital interests are encroached upon.

and there is nothing embarassing for china to go back on its position with regard to BD's entry to the UN. china was and is pakistan's friend and BD used to be part of pakistan and china had desired BD to work out important issues with pakistan first before its UN bid. today pakistan and BD are on far more amicable terms and so are china and BD, and so china and BD work closely in UN on many important issues. as for vetoes for macedonia and guetemala, they were self-serving and meant to be punitive, and macedonians and guetemalans deserved that punishment. and we managed to get the message out to taiwan and all its diplomatically recognized "allies" and now taiwan sued for diplomatic peace and officially pledged never again to pull this kind of crap on us.

going over the record, i say china has used its veto power economically, effectively, and judiciously. sure, quite a few countries got screwed along the way, but ultimately we must help ourselves first before we help others, and we certainly screwed far less people than the other four veto powers. i am eminently proud of this record.

 

[Jackdaws]

all vetoes are used for self-serving purposes: the three western powers used vetoes to cover some jewish ***** whose crimes are no less numerous than burmese junta. but that is the point of the whole design of veto power: the security council works on the premise that if the five mightiest nations would use vetoes to serve themselves on important security issues and draw a line here and there, the whole world is a safer place to live in because the most powerful countries don't have to lash out when their vital interests are encroached upon.

and there is nothing embarassing for china to go back on its position with regard to BD's entry to the UN. china was and is pakistan's friend and BD used to be part of pakistan and china had desired BD to work out important issues with pakistan first before its UN bid. today pakistan and BD are on far more amicable terms and so are china and BD, and so china and BD work closely in UN on many important issues. as for vetoes for macedonia and guetemala, they were self-serving and meant to be punitive, and macedonians and guetemalans deserved that punishment. and we managed to get the message out to taiwan and all its diplomatically recognized "allies" and now taiwan sued for diplomatic peace and officially pledged never again to pull this kind of crap on us.

going over the record, i say china has used its veto power economically, effectively, and judiciously. sure, quite a few countries got screwed along the way, but ultimately we must help ourselves first before we help others, and we certainly screwed far less people than the other four veto powers. i am eminently proud of this record.

I can see why a citizen of a Communist nation would be proud of -

a. Denying a nation which just underwent a genocide entry into the UN
b. Criticizing the military junta of Myanmar for their human right abuses
c. Empowering and emboldening Robert Mugabe - perhaps the most vile African ruler since Idi Amin.

I really have no doubt that you, being a citizen of China would be eminently proud of this record.

 

[iajj]

I can see why a citizen of a Communist nation would be proud of -

a. Denying a nation which just underwent a genocide entry into the UN
b. Criticizing the military junta of Myanmar for their human right abuses
c. Empowering and emboldening Robert Mugabe - perhaps the most vile African ruler since Idi Amin.

I really have no doubt that you, being a citizen of China would be eminently proud of this record.

you indian lot are never on the high table and know nothing of the delightful ugliness of international politics and are certainly never in a position to judge any of the five permanent seat-holders. on that high table there is no room for empty gestures of ethics, no room for regrets - although there is room to say: i did this and that, and i will do things differently with you this time - every veto we cast we cast because there was no other way. those who cannot understand the true weight of political actions that are always going to disappoint and hurt some people while protecting some people and preserving something precious for them and only for them don't deserve a seat on the high table, which is why there is no room either for indians and their (hypocritical) morals. live with that, indians, and know that being relegated to a small stool at the corner of the room means next time you indians may get screwed by people sitting on the high table.

 

[Jackdaws]

you indian lot are never on the high table and know nothing of the delightful ugliness of international politics and are certainly never in a position to judge any of the five permanent seat-holders. on that high table there is no room for empty gestures of ethics, no room for regrets - although there is room to say: i did this and that, and i will do things differently with you this time - every veto we cast we cast because there was no other way. those who cannot understand the true weight of political actions that are always going to disappoint and hurt some people while protecting some people and preserving something precious for them and only for them don't deserve a seat on the high table, which is why there is no room either for indians and their (hypocritical) morals. live with that, indians, and know that being relegated to a small stool at the corner of the room means next time you indians may get screwed by people sitting on the high table.

LOL - high table. China has been kept on the high table to clean up after the big boys are done with their meal. And no one on the security council has the balls to screw to India on pretty much any subject. I can understand it must be incredibly frustrating for the Chinese to sit on the high table but never considered an equal.

 

[iajj]

LOL - high table. China has been kept on the high table to clean up after the big boys are done with their meal. And no one on the security council has the balls to screw to India on pretty much any subject. I can understand it must be incredibly frustrating for the Chinese to sit on the high table but never considered an equal.

haha, an india that doesn't ever get a peek on the high table, and you thought you knew what china did with its power. plus, if china wants to screw india, it can do it without UN approval.

i guess that is plenty of jealousy for an yindoo to work over, eh? as i said, go sit in that stool at the kids' corner and mourn your inferiority

 

[Jackdaws]

haha, an india that doesn't ever get a peek on the high table, and you thought you knew what china did with its power. plus, if china wants to screw india, it can do it without UN approval.

i guess that is plenty of jealousy for an yindoo to work over, eh? as i said, go sit in that stool at the kids' corner and mourn your inferiority

LOL - I defy you and your Politbuto to try it if they indeed have the balls - else they can take their commie balls, dip them in Chinese tea and sip it. hahahahahaha

 

[iajj]

LOL - I defy you and your Politbuto to try it if they indeed have the balls - else they can take their commie balls, dip them in Chinese tea and sip it. hahahahahaha

the last time we did china was still the declared enemy of UN and fought a war with it. that was also when china was going through a famine and isolated politically from the communist camp and economically and militarily from the rest of the world. today china sits at the UNSC, enjoys amicable relations with russia, the only country that could realistically exert enough military pressure on china to force it to divert our land troops, and has vast and complex economic and trade entanglements with all of the world, has an economy much bigger than india's and possesses indigenous military technology superior to the latter. and on the ground, china now finds a trusted and reliable ally that it didn't have fifty years ago that can hurt india a lot worse than we do ourselves. so if back then india got spanked because china wanted to punish you militarily, today there are only too many options available and india will get screwed long before the actual military spanking begins.

 

[Jackdaws]

the last time we did china was still the declared enemy of UN and fought a war with it. that was also when china was going through a famine and isolated politically from the communist camp and economically and militarily from the rest of the world. today china sits at the UNSC, enjoys amicable relations with russia, the only country that could realistically exert enough military pressure on china to force it to divert our land troops, and has vast and complex economic and trade entanglements with all of the world, has an economy much bigger than india's and possesses indigenous military technology superior to the latter. and on the ground, china now finds a trusted and reliable ally that it didn't have fifty years ago that can hurt india a lot worse than we do ourselves. so if back then india got spanked because china wanted to punish you militarily, today there are only too many options available and india will get screwed long before the actual military spanking begins.

As I said, if your politburo has the balls to do so - they should. I recollect the last time, they captured some border villages and outposts and retreated back to Beijing claiming a victory. That's like Germany invading France - capturing some border villages, withdrawing back to Berlin and claiming they won World War 2. But I can understand why China - which has never been taken seriously by anyone would consider this some major victory.

I am waiting - let's see if your Politburo can back up your wild claims - or will they stick to doing what they do best - dipping their Communist balls in Chinese tea and drinking it. hahahahhaha

 

[Transgress]

But I can understand why China - which has never been taken seriously by anyone

Yup, pretty much sums up this guy's intelligence ......

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

As I said, if your politburo has the balls to do so - they should. I recollect the last time, they captured some border villages and outposts and retreated back to Beijing claiming a victory. That's like Germany invading France - capturing some border villages, withdrawing back to Berlin and claiming they won World War 2. But I can understand why China - which has never been taken seriously by anyone would consider this some major victory.

I am waiting - let's see if your Politburo can back up your wild claims - or will they stick to doing what they do best - dipping their Communist balls in Chinese tea and drinking it. hahahahhaha

Lol you indians like epic fail argument such as" if you have the ball to do this or do that "but why China need to repeat to what we have done to India? defeat India once shame on you, defeat India twice same on us why we want to do that ?

 

[iajj]

Lol you indians like epic fail argument such as" if you have the ball to do this or do that "but why China need to repeat to what we have done to India? defeat India once shame on you, defeat India twice same on us why we want to do that ?

yindoos can comfort themselves with the thought that after the last spanking from china we haven't thrashed them again, just like they always like to gloat that no more rapists have been elected to national office after the last rapist was elected to the congress.

in yindu everything is rosy and pink - at least since last time some bad stuff happened to yindoos, hahahaha