What's new

India trying to occupy Bangladesh territory

thats why i used the word 'MAYBE'.........and yes bangladeshis beat you ,not us indians.....we only acted as a catalyst......your other question is naive,soldiers who fight fight for motherland are always brave......i never questioned a soldier's bravery!!!....but praised some who brought their country freedom,that is the greatest feat a man can achive.......edit-punjab??...lolz....kashmir??....lolz....just today some 'freedom fighters' killed a kashmiri with his 3 YR OLD SON,then again lets keep this issues out of bd section

Some foreign trained Mukti Bahini ‘freedom fighters’ killed thousands of innocent people what to say?????

Now what will be your pathetic excuse? Pakistani Army was killing innocent people? Indian army is also killing innocent Kashmiris so what is the difference between the situations?????
 
Last edited:
Some foreign trained Mukti Bahini ‘freedom fighters’ killed thousands of innocent people what to say?????

Now what will be your pathetic excuse? Pakistani Army was killing innocent people? Indian army is also killing innocent Kashmiris so hat is the difference between the situations?????

Great Pakistani Ploy.....lost the argument...Throw Kashmir ...go of topic...and start the fight....

You people claimed similar stories while fueling Khalistani movement ....where is the so called Khalistan Now....in your dreams....
 
Great Pakistani Ploy.....lost the argument...Throw Kashmir ...go of topic...and start the fight....

You people claimed similar stories while fueling Khalistani movement ....where is the so called Khalistan Now....in your dreams....

You people are invading a independent country and when questioned, justifying your aggression and praising the separatists of 38 years back. Why are you running? Stick to the topic and answer why are you interfering in an independent country’s matters.
 
No body attacked east pakistan......you ended your 'rule' there yourselves........except some rezakars nobody wanted to live under the pak banner.....bangladeshis earned their own freedom,and rightfully so against endless oppressions,live with it
 
No body attacked east pakistan......you ended your 'rule' there yourselves........except some rezakars nobody wanted to live under the pak banner.....bangladeshis earned their own freedom,and rightfully so against endless oppressions,live with it

You are unable to understand my point. You must stick to the topic and answer why your country is interfering in an independent country’s matters? If you want to praise the freedom fighters than praise those also who are fighting to get rid of India. Why not? Isn’t this a double standard?
 
You people are invading a independent country and when questioned, justifying your aggression and praising the separatists of 38 years back. Why are you running? Stick to the topic and answer why are you interfering in an independent country’s matters.

Very confusing, who is invading whom? I was not aware of any invasion underway in Asia?
 
India gave them freedom ????


I personally also agree with fact that without India's intervention East pakistan wouldn't be seperated from west pak however I totally reject the claim by indian that they helped east pakistani out of sheer love or any affection. It was totally for the interest of India's national security because India couldn't effort to have two wing of pakistan with same ideology. If it was selfless act by indian than how indian members here explain follwing phrase by late Indira: Hazaaron saal ki badla le liya. I mean where is this thousand years of revenge come from when india claime to liberate east pakistani from west pakistan aggression or was it simply historical revenge due to thousand years of muslim rule over hindus in Hindustan?

Some of my country men is naive and accept india as their savior but unable to understand the fact that ultimate loser is us as we being a muslim liver under the dominance of mushrik. Slave mentality I would say

Hazaaron saal ki badla le liya.... I know how pakistani feel about it though a segment in bd doesn't contain enough islamic blood to feel the humilitaion as if indira only meant it for west pakistani and if that was the touth than Indira didn't think east pakistani as pure muslim..Once again we still the loser...

when the hell we are going to get this fact that india only using bd to suppress muslim in subcontinent. If west and east combine it's strength than it will not be far when we reclaim our superiority and free our people from mushrik aggression. Wallahi when we gone a get it......:hitwall:
 
Last edited:
This thread is not for discussing Kashmir or 1971 or any other indian excuse to derail the thread. There are plenty of threads to discuss these subjects and please choose accordingly.
 
Yeah,yeah.....care to see who bought kashmir in this thread???....ignorant as always..,
 
See,whom i was replying to and on what context.....,btw,lets get bact to the topic
 
You are unable to understand my point. You must stick to the topic and answer why your country is interfering in an independent country’s matters? If you want to praise the freedom fighters than praise those also who are fighting to get rid of India. Why not? Isn’t this a double standard?

Interesting that you ask this question when Pakistan blatantly interferes in Afghanistan in the name of "Strategic Depth", an independent country with a UN seat which Pakistan considers its 'backyard'!!

Likewise, lets just say its India's "Strategic Depth" policy in B'desh.
 
Who was praising Freedom fighters of their own choice?
It was not our "own choice'. On the contrary we were forced to support them because of a massive influx of refugees from B'desh fleeing the atrocities of the Pak army/Pak govt policies in erstwhile East Pak. Once it became clear that we had a refugee problem, we decided to intervene. Reread History again please!
 
Interesting that you ask this question when Pakistan blatantly interferes in Afghanistan in the name of "Strategic Depth", an independent country with a UN seat which Pakistan considers its 'backyard'!!

Likewise, lets just say its India's "Strategic Depth" policy in B'desh.

So you have accepted that you have interfered in BD’s matters. First honest answer I would say.


It was not our "own choice'. On the contrary we were forced to support them because of a massive influx of refugees from B'desh fleeing the atrocities of the Pak army/Pak govt policies in erstwhile East Pak. Once it became clear that we had a refugee problem, we decided to intervene. Reread History again please! .

We have ended the discussion here. We can discuss this in another thread; I replied b/c the thread was being derailed. Any ways Pakistan also faced influx of people from Indian occupied Kashmir, by this logic we have every right to interfere in occupied Kashmir.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom