India to grow at 7.8 per cent in 2015-16; surpass China: ADB

[CONNAN]

 

[Abingdonboy]

Not good enough for India, this d!ck measuring with India is frankly embarassing for India.

 

[CONNAN]

Not good enough for India, this d!ck measuring with India is frankly embarassing for India.

yep there is lot of d!ck measuring now a days

 

[Luca1]

to be honest that's not all that impressive considering China economy is larger than India's so it's all relative to current GDP.

India believe in the tortoise hare fable. China is hare and India is Turtoise. So India expect China to sleep and allow India to catch up.

 

[migflug]

China india years
7 8-8.5 78
5-6 10+ 21
If it dosent grow 10+ 11
(Hypothetical)

 

[Beast]

India believe in the tortoise hare fable. China is hare and India is Turtoise. So India expect China to sleep and allow India to catch up.

Being call a tortoise is insulting

 

[Luca1]

Being call a tortoise is insulting

Are you saying that they insult themselves?

 

[Beast]

Are you saying that they insult themselves?

Who will call themselves tortoise? Indian

 

[Luca1]

Who will call themselves tortoise? Indian

Well. They are the Turtoise and China is the hare that slumbers.

 

[East or West India Best]

Being call a tortoise is insulting

Don't you guys eat tortoises? If so, India is in store of something else...

 

[Kinetic]

add all the superlatives from dictionary and make a new phrase, that only india will achieve



missed? indian shining, did it failed? india was never in the race with china, india wants to, but has failed to up till now.

An idiot is always idiot. China became trillion dollar economy in 2000 while India became the same in 2006. There is a six years gap. Do your madrassa math, cheerleader.

Why not global-mega-ultra-supreme-param-power?

For that stupid like you exists.

What wired and stupid nonsense. He is the architect of the modern Indian economy and even in recent UPA regimes, especially UPA 1 he gave consistent 8 to 9 % growth.

You need sense to understand something sensible. Architect destroyed Indian economy. The UPA 1 got every benefits of earlier NDA policies and corruption was also lower compared to UPA 2 thats why they did better. From 2006/7 GDP growth started shrinking generally. Ruthless corruption and govt's unwillingness to attract business was the reason.

India believe in the tortoise hare fable. China is hare and India is Turtoise. So India expect China to sleep and allow India to catch up.

Pathetic.

Be fair bro, under MMS India's economic growth was very healthy (averaging 8%+) it is only for a 12-18 month period in 2012-14 where grwoth dipped to 5% ( that has now been revised up by the way) where this myth that MMS was weak on the economy came in. One should also note that a lot of the fruits the current GoI are reaping are directly as a result of the work MMS did in his last 100 days as PM (he had personally set up a body to fast track hundreds of infrastucutre projects). The steps the NDA took post-May 2014 would not produce benefits for at least 12-18 months.

And lets not forget MMS is largely responsible for the liberalisation agenda from 1991/2 onwards that has lead to India being where it is today.



Positive news but India needs to get above 8.5% and maintain that level for 15-20 years at the minimum, this is certainly what Modi looks to be laying the groundwork for as we speak.

Bro, my points as I have mentioned earlier were, one good governance for business, two land policy, three in labor laws, four launching Brand India globally are some of the key points of what a govt can do minimum to attract business and MMS failed in all that while he supported endless corruption and scandals under his govt. think you will agree.

 

[truthseeker2010]

An idiot is always idiot. China became trillion dollar economy in 2000 while India became the same in 2006. There is a six years gap. Do your madrassa math, cheerleader.

there is something called inflation vs real growth.... which is indicated by HDI,
just like there is difference between economic development and economic growth, so if only numbers satisfy you, then i congratulate late you and your thinking..... becuase in hdi india is lowest in brics at 135 in medium category, where as china is at 91 in high category....

 

[Guynextdoor2]

An idiot is always idiot. China became trillion dollar economy in 2000 while India became the same in 2006. There is a six years gap. Do your madrassa math, cheerleader.


For that stupid like you exists.



You need sense to understand something sensible. Architect destroyed Indian economy. The UPA 1 got every benefits of earlier NDA policies and corruption was also lower compared to UPA 2 thats why they did better. From 2006/7 GDP growth started shrinking generally. Ruthless corruption and govt's unwillingness to attract business was the reason.



Pathetic.



Bro, my points as I have mentioned earlier were, one good governance for business, two land policy, three in labor laws, four launching Brand India globally are some of the key points of what a govt can do minimum to attract business and MMS failed in all that while he supported endless corruption and scandals under his govt. think you will agree.

Bhakt doesn't understand history. Before NDA-1 BJP was even more socialist than Congress, opposed every liberalization move that congress started in 1991. When disinvestment was proposed they called for national strike saying congress was selling the family jewels. Opposed telecom liberalization saying 'private players will launch extoritionary rates. ABVP had to be convinced extensively to give up that line. All that he did was continue UPA's policies of further liberalization. Obvioulsy Bhakt being uneducated will cook up give out crap endlessly. But economists know that for illiterate Bhakt these things are incomprehensible.

India believe in the tortoise hare fable. China is hare and India is Turtoise. So India expect China to sleep and allow India to catch up.

Robin Lawley is fat and ugly.

MMS is responsible for India's growth. In fact, he should hold the place in society that Nehru currently occupies.

I think people unduly blame Nehru for socialist policies. They don't realize that at about 1950s, capitalism had completely failed. Economic depression, currency crisis and extreme instability marked the capitalist economies. To the extent that not only did UK vote out conservatives and bring in labor, but even the US had started putting up heavy regulation in industries like Airlines where they went down to the level of price regulaiton. Fact is that this new formula of liberalization and growth was established only in the 1980s. By then people had figured out some of the problems in previous capitalist models and how to fix them.So any government that took a socialist route till the 1980s was not actually wrong, but in fact following world experience. Fact is the the modern world has rejected the previous forms of capitalism altogether. There is now a large role for Private sector and an even larger role for government. As shown through Obamacare and NHS. There is no possibility that these insights were available for Nehru at the time. He really was a man of his age and did basis what he knew till then.

 

[N3oN]

Bhakt doesn't understand history. Before NDA-1 BJP was even more socialist than Congress, opposed every liberalization move that congress started in 1991. When disinvestment was proposed they called for national strike saying congress was selling the family jewels. Opposed telecom liberalization saying 'private players will launch extoritionary rates. ABVP had to be convinced extensively to give up that line. All that he did was continue UPA's policies of further liberalization. Obvioulsy Bhakt being uneducated will cook up give out crap endlessly. But economists know that for illiterate Bhakt these things are incomprehensible.



Robin Lawley is fat and ugly.



I think people unduly blame Nehru for socialist policies. They don't realize that at about 1950s, capitalism had completely failed. Economic depression, currency crisis and extreme instability marked the capitalist economies. To the extent that not only did UK vote out conservatives and bring in labor, but even the US had started putting up heavy regulation in industries like Airlines where they went down to the level of price regulaiton. Fact is that this new formula of liberalization and growth was established only in the 1980s. By then people had figured out some of the problems in previous capitalist models and how to fix them.So any government that took a socialist route till the 1980s was not actually wrong, but in fact following world experience. Fact is the the modern world has rejected the previous forms of capitalism altogether. There is now a large role for Private sector and an even larger role for government. As shown through Obamacare and NHS. There is no possibility that these insights were available for Nehru at the time. He really was a man of his age and did basis what he knew till then.

Congress didn't do anything substantial in UPA 2.. Looking at the scams .. It will be the highest ranking corrupted party in Indian history.. Moreover they rule India in the greatest form of the communalism.. They work for the votes not. Not for the development.
Regarding Nehru's era I don't know much but theres always controversies regarding Nehru Gandhi family.. Looking at recently raised questions about neharu Gandhi families.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Congress didn't do anything substantial in UPA 2.. Looking at the scams .. It will be the highest ranking corrupted party in Indian history.. Moreover they rule India in the greatest form of the communalism.. They work for the votes not. Not for the development.
Regarding Nehru's era I don't know much but theres always controversies regarding Nehru Gandhi family.. Looking at recently raised questions about neharu Gandhi families.

Actually I used to think UPA 2 will be the most corrupt party till now. I guess in the next 10 years we'll know that it was Modi's government that was the most corrupt.