What's new

India to back UN on action against Syria

Are u nuts??

First u say we should support Iran since they give us oil.

now u post anti saudi links.. when saudi is number 1 exporter of oil to us and as extradited a few wanted terrorists to India...

So we should support all , right? :cuckoo:

hey bhagwan.....................anyone will give us oil if we pay

what about now when we want to pay in rupee??

man u are really killing me.

Saudi is directly or indirectly financing all the terrorists and madrassas of the world........the spillover effect is felt everywhere including kashmir and in the activities of indian mujahideen

This ideology is dangerous and we must oppose this at all costs as we have 13% muslims in india too

Now where am i wrong buddy??

and pls be civil.........we represent the same flag

The recent removal of muslim brotherhood was financed by...........................saudi arabia as it has publicly supported military

Osama bin laden was..................a saudi

it is getting stronger in the middle east after the fall of saddam and now the syrian movement.
 
.
@Dillinger

any comments whether we should vote

1)yes
2)no
3)abstain
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
hey bhagwan.....................anyone will give us oil if we pay

what about now when we want to pay in rupee??

man u are really killing me.

Saudi is directly or indirectly financing all the terrorists and madrassas of the world........the spillover effect is felt everywhere including kashmir and in the activities of indian mujahideen

This ideology is dangerous and we must oppose this at all costs as we have 13% muslims in india too

Now where am i wrong buddy??

and pls be civil.........we represent the same flag

You should read previous news.. the trouble over payment in dollars through bank is the sole reason.
As Iran has no buyers they agreed to rupees.

If saudi is financing, you advocate war against them... not some vote in syria...

World will be the same after syria too...
 
.
Iran will accept even barter system.. havent u read about sanctions of banks???

Even north korea is an ally.
wahabbi, yehabbi, kahibii is not our concern.

Dont think history will repeat and somebody will come to help in trouble times like an angel like in boll movies.




What was that extremely advanced and very critical to national security technology we got from Russia???

1)nuclear submarines
2)nuclear reactors
3)uranium recycling process
4)cryogenic engines
5)Advanced PESA radars
6)fastest fighter aircraft in the world Mig-25
7) Konkat-5 Heavy ERA
8)Metallurgical knowledge.
9)Stealth ships
10) Ultra silent diesel subs like Kilo ,which no one would sell us in 80's
11) super manuverable aircraft like Su-30MKI which is comparable/better than F-15's
12) T-90 tank ,the first MBT to have active protection and anti-tank mine jamming system
Do I need to need to tell you more ?
 
.
You should read previous news.. the trouble over payment in dollars through bank is the sole reason.
As Iran has no buyers they agreed to rupees.

If saudi is financing, you advocate war against them... not some vote in syria...

World will be the same after syria too...

It won't be mate

1)i told u after every such intervention oil prices go up as supply will be controlled by USA

2)What happens if tomorrow US decides to attack iran

answer------we loose the option of payment in rupee again and incurr a loss of 12 billion dollar per year

3)Saudi is behind most of the foreign money that comes from outside financing IM etc

4)All i say is that if USA attacks syria today then in a year or so it will use nuclear weapons as a pretext and syria as a base to attack iran which is in no one's interest but saudi and USA as it will control oil flow from straits of hormuz

5)WE MUST ABSTAIN TO ASSERT THAT WE ARE NOT TAKING SIDES AS THATS THE BEST WE CAN DO TO OPPOSE THE ATTACK

Ideally we should oppose but we have to be practical here and can't really oppose west

so a tightrope
 
.
Also advanced sea skimmers like Yakhonts whose indian derivative is Brahmos.
 
.
Also advanced sea skimmers like Yakhonts whose indian derivative is Brahmos.

And ppl think that we have made the cryogenic engine...........india's future without russian help.

here is the story

under the US pressure russia stopped giving india knowhow to build a cryogenic engine but still kept on selling us the engines for the launches of gslv and that russian engine itself served as a template for our indigenous cryogenic engine.

Its because of USA pressure that we didn't get

1)longer range brahmos(not the mctr as usa granted south korea the exception and gave them 800 km missiles last year)

2)el/m 2052 aesa radar from israel for tejas mk2

3)USA is giving pakistan billions in aid

and still we are blind or what?







0
 
.
What insanity. With a 300m muslim population which are mostly uneducated and breeding in volumes you should have thought of the consequences of your decision in the next 20 years. You support the foreign intervention of a country and no country is going to be safe. Pakistan should have been a good example of you don't win any prizes for being yes men to your supposed allies.

India is supporting UN decision which is a collective decision of all the countries in the world which includes Middle eastern countries.
Why are you jumping to a conclusion here?
Any UN resolution has to be supported by 5 permanent members which includes Russia, so India is indirectly towing the line of Russia here.
Pakistanis :lol:
 
.
India is supporting UN decision which is a collective decision of all the countries in the world which includes Middle eastern countries.
Why are you jumping to a conclusion here?
Any UN resolution has to be supported by 5 permanent members which includes Russia, so India is indirectly towing the line of Russia here.
Pakistanis :lol:

USA will bypass UN just like in case of iraq and remember we found NO WMD
 
. .
USA will bypass UN just like in case of iraq and remember we found NO WMD

If they attack Syria unilaterally which they will do probably, can we do a $hit about it. Answer is No. So why it needed for us to antagonize US by going against them?
 
.
If they attack Syria unilaterally which they will do probably, can we do a $hit about it. Answer is No. So why it needed for us to antagonize US by going against them?

WE SHOULD SIMPLY ABSTAIN...............i TOLD THE SAME IN UPPER POST

ITS THE BEST SOLUTION
 
.
This is really much ado about nothing. India usually finds away to keep itself clean during these decisions. I think this has been good for India in the past but soon it is going to have to take sides every now and then and take a stance and have a voice. Appeasing all sides are not the actions of a rising power.


If Indian fighter jets were to take part in strikes against Syria THEN this would be news.
 
.
This is really much ado about nothing. India usually finds away to keep itself clean during these decisions. I think this has been good for India in the past but soon it is going to have to take sides every now and then and take a stance and have a voice. Appeasing all sides are not the actions of a rising power.


If Indian fighter jets were to take part in strikes against Syria THEN this would be news.

we recently took wrong sides in case of

1)iran

2)sri lanka
 
.
There are no good solutions here.

On one side you have AQ affiliated Sunni terrorists who will massacre the Shia if they win, on the other side you have a regime that is likely using chemicals on its own people to kill them on a mass scale.

Any side winning outright means a likely genocide of the others sects. The rebels winning would mean a base for the AQ terrorists.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom