What's new

India: The circle of fire grows close

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
India finds itself having to face a series of closely entwined internal and external threats. Several of these critical factors are worsening. The Authorities of New Delhi should enact an effective strategy to counteract this situation in order to avoid a destabilizing process which could affect the entire Indian system.

Andrea Carbonari

Equilibri.net (18 January 2008)

In analysis of the Indian security situation on a national level, it is difficult to distinguish internal threats from external threats. Various guerrilla or terrorist groups find refuge and support in bordering nations or have links with groups which operate beyond the border. The emblematic case is that of the Jammu and Kashmir territory, a federal state in which guerrilla warfare is active and supported in various ways, by Pakistan, a nation with which India has various disputes over borders. This merging of internal and external elements provokes and aggravates threats.

Geographically, India is surrounded by a complex of crisis situations which have internal repercussions, a complex which in synthesis can be described as a “circle of fire”. This circle of fire is itself made up by various other circles, due to the dangerous nature of the threat posed to Indian public order. The first ring is constituted by Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh; the second by China and Myanmar, while the third consists of Bhutan and the Maldives.

This work aims to highlight some deciders (also economic), two aspects which are substantially undervalued by the media (also by those who are concerned by this reality). One is that of the vastness and complexity of threats to India’s public security (even though they are considered to be superficial); the other is that of the effect over public order that relations with countries which are directly bordering have. Due to want for space, internal problems such as the role of organised criminality or the effects of corruption, or foreign policy, such as that of the alliances that New Delhi is consolidating. For the same reasons, there is a limit on the space dedicated to the role of single external subjects, to analyze those elements which influence India’s life.


The first ring

Data supplied by authorities and analysts paint a precise picture of India in reality as regards its security profile. It is calculated that in 231 of the 608 districts which comprise India, the phenomenon of guerrilla warfare and terrorism exists to differing extents. On a general level, the Asian country’s borders are affected, as is observed by Gurmeet Kanwal, by phenomenon such as cross-border terrorism, separatist guerrilla warfare, the entrenchment of arms and drug trafficking and clandestine immigration. According to Kanwal, the country’s problematic borders aren’t clearly understood its by political leadership and this translates into a lack of coordination over the control of the borders. Instead, this should be a priority, given the ease with which it can be controlled.


Pakistan and Islamic terrorism

The most obvious example is given by the western border. According to the Indian Armed Forces (AF), various terrorist groups of Islamic inspiration with bases in Pakistan freely cross the border and hit Indian territory, mainly in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.The maintenance of public order in this state is therefore particularly important for India, not only due to the gravity of the facts which befall it but also due to relations with more direct adversary, Pakistan. Jammu and Kashmir is a piece of territory contested between the two nations. 41% of deaths due to terrorism in India in 2007 were registered here. For some time political groups and guerrilla formations have been asking for the demilitarization of the state, alleging as a motivation, the progressive reduction (throughout the course of recent years) of episodes of violence and guerrilla infiltration attacks from Pakistani groups. But the central Authorities don’t intend to remove the presence of the Armed Forces, untrusting of the decreasing trend in episodes of violence. It could in fact be the fruit of a plan (put into act mainly by Pakistan) aimed at lowering India’s level of attention, before striking. New Delhi is prepared to reduce the number of troops and to redeploy them, but not to leave the Line of Control (LoC) unguarded, the provisional border that divides the contested territory in two.

The Confidence Building Measures, those measures created in the diplomatic field to build the trust of the population and Pakistan, which up until now, hasn’t had any significant results. It has attempted to stimulate communication between India and Pakistan, interrupted by three wars.The arrest of a soldier from the Islam inspired terrorist formation, Laskar-e-Tayyaba (LeT) originating from Manipur (north-eastern Indian state) leads us to believe that they are creating links with terrorist groups of various ideologies and with different platforms, particularly with the Moaist guerrilla group. According to Indian analysts, the Pakistani secret service Inter Service Intelligence (ISI) would then be looking to give momentum to terrorism of Klahistan matrix. This movement, entrenched in the Sikh community, aims towards the creation of an autonomous state sympathetic to the Indian Punjab. A series of political measures (but not only) put into place by New Delhi has in fact, overcome the Khalist guerrillas, whose presence is by now reduced to being marginal. But Islamabad, which has supported the group in the past, would like to re-activate this threat, through supporting groups such as Babbar Khalsa International. According to the ISI, Khalistan guerrilla groups are fused with those which are active in Kashmir.

In recent months in Islamabad, a complex phase of political transition has been underway. Even if it early for exact judgements, it can be confirmed that elements have emerged which lead us to hypothesize about Pakistan's change of attitude towards India. It is however clear that Islamic-inspired terrorism is caused by elements quite apart from Pakistani intervention or the intervention of other nations (such as Bangladesh). It is caused by the social and cultural malaise of various sections of the Indian Muslim community (which according to estimates, is numerically the second or third largest in the world). Growing Hindu nationalism (with which, acts of violence against the Islamic minority are in fact tolerated) contributes to the feeling of isolation felt above all by young Muslims, who could decide to use arms to fight against a situation which for them seems without end. Undoubtedly, the ISI takes advantage of this malaise, which is also born out of the inefficient policies put into place by the Indian political class.


Bangladesh and Islamic terrorism

The border with Bangladesh, along which clashes and killings of people who cross it take place, is characterised by the so-called “Contested Enclaves and Territories”. In other words, according to India, it has 111 enclaves on Bangladeshi territory (to a total of 17,158 acres) and there are 51 Bengalese enclaves on Indian territory (about 7000 acres). Thirty four pieces of land claimed by India are under the control of Dacca while 40 pieces of Bengalese territory are in India's possession. The 1974 Treaty for the solution of these controversies is yet to be applied.

So, despite the efforts taken regarding this, by Bengal, various terrorist groups continue to use their land as a base from which to hit India. New Delhi observes the establishment of integralist formations in Bengalese society with concern. The huge amount of clandestine immigration coming from Bangladesh risks destabilizing the demographic and political situations in the Indian states positioned on the border.


Nepal and the Maoist guerrillas

The ties between Indian Maoist and Nepalese guerrilla movements remains the point of focus for New Delhi in its relations with Kathmandu. The phase of Nepalese political instability, with the ever greater establishment of the Maoists of the Communist Party of Nepal- Maoist (CPN-M) is looked upon with concern by Indian observers (although New Delhi fails to put an effective strategy into place). Added to this are the anti-Indian declarations made at the CPN-M summits on various occasions. The intervention of Western powers in Nepalese goings-on is in fact a continual accusation of the guerrilla groups. To this is added the deep (and for some, definitive) crisis in the monarchy, whose defence used to constitute one of the two pillars in Indian policy towards Kathmandu (the other was the support given to the democratic system of a liberal nature). Even if the two insurrection movements are proceeding autonomously, the porosity of the border favours the making of contacts. It is noted that the soldiers of the Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) are becoming more active, exploiting the weakness of Governmental contrasting action. According to official estimates, the CPI-M could make available about 10,000 armed men and 45,000 soldiers. Within India's borders, Maoists have created a type of Red Corridor, a band of territory that goes from the state of Andhra Pradesh to Nepal, within which they have consolidated their power.

Action taken against firstly, Maoist guerrillas but also several other insurrection movements (apart from several exceptions) is clearly weakened by chronic deficiencies in the police force. Deriving from this deficiency, other weaknesses in the conduct of the secret services occur. This organism is weakened further by a scarcity of resources and training. From a political point of view, there is a substantial lack of coordination in the management of conflict. For various reasons this is mainly entrusted to individual states. This leads, among other things, to the politicization of the fight against guerrilla warfare, with approaches and strategies which vary from area to area (and are in some cases, divergent). Observers have accused the politicians of various states of making agreements with the Maoists and of standing in the way of the action of the police force, for electoral reasons. In several cases administrators haven't been able to predict (and as a consequence, stop) the establishment of the Maoists on their territory. The soldiers of the CPI-M are also making the most of the social malaise created by, for example, the more or less forced movement of the population, due to public and private infrastructural projects (such as steel factories etc). According to Indian intelligence, Maoists have managed to infiltrate the industrial complexes under construction with the aim of inciting a revolt. They have declared their will to collaborate with other guerrilla and terrorist groups which are active in other areas of the country.


Sri Lanka and Tamil guerrilla action

Since 1972, in Sri Lanka, a conflict has been underway between central Administration and movements born from the Tamil community. The clashes originate from the discriminatory policy taken towards the Tamil community, by the political class, predominately originating from Sri Lanka's Sinhalese ethnic majority.The main guerrilla group is the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) who fight for an independent Tamil state. For now, they have created their own autonomous territory in the north of the island with Kilinochchi as its capital and its own administrative structure. The LTTE are one of the groups with which the CPI-M has been looking to develop relations from the moment in which it became active both in Sri Lanka and in the Indian State of Tamil Nadu. On June 25th 2007 a training camp for Indian Maoists in the district on Theni was discovered. According to observers, Maoist followers would be interested in learning more sophisticated combative techniques from the LTTE, particularly the use of air-borne devices in guerrilla action. But it would also like to learn how to make the most of child soldiers.

From their point of view, the LTTE are interested in setting up refuges in Tamil Nadu to help them avoid the Sinhalese Armed Forces, which has seized control of the island's east and which also aims to take over the north, the stronghold of the insurrection movement. The emersion of relations between the two groups is something which worries New Delhi greatly and according to Tamil sources, several protocols with Sri Lanka will be signed to remedy this. These agreements will provide for, among other things, the exchange of intelligence information, above all regarding maritime movements.


Translation by Megan Ball

India: The circle of fire grows close (First Part)
 
.
Terrorism is a threat which all South Asian nation face. Of course some are more at risk than others, but still all face threat. I thhink we need to share more information on these threats.
 
.
Circle of Fire

Unless terrorist or guerrilla groups find safe havens, funding and weapons supply, they cannot sustain themselves. The safe havens can be within the country, but in most cases, in neighbouring countries, since waging terrorism requires also a phase for rest, regroup, and refit..

In case, certain areas of a country has been made a “liberated Zone”, in such areas these groups operate with impunity as they become their safe havens to rest, regroup and refit.

This is not unique to India alone. It is axiomatically applicable for all countries where there is terrorism or insurrection.

India, however, is uniquely different from the rest of the countries around the its neighbourhood because the diversity of its citizenship in terms of language, culture and traditions, religions, etc is more pronounced than the neighbours. Therefore, it is easier to aggravate and incite.

History plays an important part in the feeling of insecurity of some neighbours of India. They used to be a part of India and that fact haunts because the separation was born out of animosity, rife and bloodshed. This creates a psyche that encourages suspicion as also the fear of being “gobbled up” if one drops the guard.

For all neighbours of India, India’s economic, military strength and size also permeates a sense of unease. Therefore, they are not averse to engineering stimuli that make India uncomfortable in political and cartographic stability and hence, as a corollary, economic progress since to maintain political and cartographic integrity, it would have to resort to military and police intervention.

India’s size and internal strength, be it political, economic, military, industry and in strategic minerals, also raises apprehensions in already established and debutant superpowers. Therefore, their ensuring a flux in India is essential, since one more contender for the Crown of the World is not in their interest.

India’s strategic geographical position is also an issue that makes countries uncomfortable, more so given India’s internal strength mentioned earlier. India literally overlooks the Indian Ocean and hence the sealanes. Much of the world’s economy, especially the strategic resource, oil, traverses these sealanes. This aspect bears significance more so because it controls one end of the strategic choke point i.e. the Straits of Malacca.

In short, India appears a threat to nations, be they neighbours or established or budding super powers.

The first ring

Cross border terrorism, separatist guerrilla warfare, the entrenchment of arms and drug trafficking and clandestine immigration are instruments for destabilisation.

It is obvious to any person conversant with national security to realise that demilitarisation of Kashmir would only be an invitation of those who wish to destabilise India by providing “moral support”. All countries in the neighbourhood are facing a similar problem where there are insurrections raging and they are well aware of the fallacy of demilitarisation. It would mean handing over on a platter to the terrorist and insurgents! No sovereign country can abdicate a part of a country to another.


Pakistan and Islamic terrorism


Given the mutual animosity and many attempts to capture Kashmir, it is obvious that the decreasing trends are taken to be a “lull before the storm” and hence, demilitarisation is not an option. Pakistan might find it illogical, but then history does not permit extending the other cheek in true Christ manner.

The issue of only holding the Line of Control (LC) and removing the remainder of troops from Kashmir is militarily flawed. Unless there are reserves, once the crust (LC) is broken by the adversary, it becomes a free run. Kashmir is not a desert where reserve armour columns can move fast, contest, and hold and then destroy the intruding forces. It is mountainous terrain and movement is tedious and tardy. Hence, adequate reserves are essential along each appreciated thrust lines of the adversary.

It is obvious that Pakistan cannot take Kashmir by force, but it sure can increase India’s discomfort by encouraging ‘death by thousand cuts’ by encouraging by the way of funds, weapons and training the various terrorist and guerrilla groups operating in India, notwithstanding ideology or whether they are co religionists. But it is an expensive exercise and assistance to play proxy for other ‘interested’ countries and vested interest should not be surprising.

Another aspect that compounds India’s problems is that there is a growing militancy amongst some sections of the Indian Moslem community ever since (9/11) and the Global War of Terror. The Pan Islamism and the growing Born Again fervour are most dangerous to India’s political health since it is also contributing to a rise in Hindu fundamentalist elements. This naturally does not bode well for India as an entity. There is no doubt that this situation is ideal for emotional exploitation by interested coreligionist countries.

Bangladesh and Islamic terrorism


Bangladesh internal politics is as complex and ferociously and violently contested as of its original country. It is a embarrassment to itself that while they liberated themselves to have a democratic future, it has been wracked with military regimes in the same manner which they claimed to be averse to.

In addition, while Bangladesh once was the economic powerhouse for Pakistan, it has reduced itself with corruption and graft to a poorhouse!

Therefore, to divert attention of its citizenship, the Indian bogey has come handy, more so, since it was a historical instrument that was practised successfully when it was an integral part of Pakistan.

Saudi funding in resurgent Islam also came handy in ensuring the basic needs of the people and it has become lucrative business for politicians to allow fundamentalist elements, supported by interested countries and religion powered interests, to operate from its territory against India.

It is pertinent to note that while successive governments of Bangaldesh have repeatedly and vociferously denied any involvement with anti India terrorists or allowing them sanctuary, the current military government that is cleaning up Bangladesh has admitted to the same. The reason is not far to reach. The military is not taking money to protect these elements unlike the politician. Apparently, the military backed interim government is seriously keen on cleaning Bangladesh and removing the historical baggage of corruption and misrule.


Nepal and the Maoist guerrillas


Nepal was a country in this region beyond strife.

However, with the Chinese actively courting Nepal, Communist ideology apparently has taken a grip over the country, more so, since the disparity between the rich and the poor is more pronounced in Nepal than any country in the region.

The collusion between in China and some Islamist countries, importantly Saudi Arabia, cannot be missed since of the Madesis who populate the Terai region, are Moslems. The dramatic increase of mosques and madrassa in this region and the Born Again psyche is a pointer in this direction.

Nepal is a conduit for the Chinese ideology and support to the Maoists, South of the Nepal India border and is ideally poised to propagate terrorism, be it religion inspired or ideologically inspired.

Sri Lanka and Tamil guerrilla action

The Tamil connection of Sri Lanka dangerous since its aim is Tamil Eelam or United Tamil nation. It has its emotional appeal in Tamilnadu. While it is appealing to some section of Tamil society, it is not conducive for India’s political integrity and security concern.

This is the reason why the Indian Naval Chief recently admitted India’s indirect assistance to the Sri Lankan govt, wherein Sri Lankan Tamils are being blocked from entering Indian waters or India.
 
.
One thing is sure...that is your hatred for Islam. But that would be saying obious to a bigot like you.

Just wondering how you did not find Tamil and Islam relation, forget india's role in Creating Terrorist LTTE.
 
.
Sri Lanka and Tamil guerrilla action

The Tamil connection of Sri Lanka dangerous since its aim is Tamil Eelam or United Tamil nation. It has its emotional appeal in Tamilnadu. While it is appealing to some section of Tamil society, it is not conducive for India’s political integrity and security concern.

This is the reason why the Indian Naval Chief recently admitted India’s indirect assistance to the Sri Lankan govt, wherein Sri Lankan Tamils are being blocked from entering Indian waters or India.

Sorry, I don't agree with you. There is no such sentiments here except that the little sympathy for the Srilankan Tamils. Most people don't care about Srilanka or Srilankan Tamils.

When V Gopalsamy (called as Vaiko) was arrested under POTA for speaking in support of LTTE, he had to spend around an year alone behind the bars. Even there was no public support to him.

There was a movement in the past that is too based on Dradvian idealogy. That movement was not so popular amaong the public. Only few groups wanted a seperate nation, that is too due to the anti-brahmin (or anti-aryan) politics. It had died long ago.
 
.
One thing is sure...that is your hatred for Islam. But that would be saying obious to a bigot like you.

Just wondering how you did not find Tamil and Islam relation, forget india's role in Creating Terrorist LTTE.

Because it is not any hatred of Islam that is indicated. It is only the realities of geopolitics that prompts my post.

I do hope international geopolitics is not too alien for you.

Islam, especially the Deobandis and Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia, like it or not, is impinging on many countries of the world, therefore to be blind to it, would be stupid. It is plaguing Pakistan itself and so what should you do? Think it is not there and is only a bad dream? That is the escapism of the gullible amongst the Moslems that is creating all the problems of even Islamic countries.

Are you of the camp that applauds Mehsud, just because he is a Moslem? If so, do it and Pakistan will be burning into ash. Face reality and stop feeling everyone is against you! None have the time. They have equally serious problems as you to attend to.

Please wake up and smell the coffee and not chase ghosts and imaginary phantoms of your own bigoted mind (which you accuse other of having) to bring solace to your self induced confused and tormented heart!


As far as India is concerned in Sri Lanka, I have written that this Tamil Eelam is a danger to India.

Now, if you don't understand English and if you are burning with hate so much so your reading prowess becomes a zero, what can I do?

This is what Mastan Khan has to say:

What is happening in pakistan---everybody who is somebody knows what the solutions are---but who wants to be the first one to stand upto it!!!

Stand up and be counted and not hide behind imaginary "enemies", conjured by insecurities, obfuscated by an irrational fear of being swamped!

Unlike you, there are many Pakistanis who have confidence in themselves and their Nation and do not go running for cover with emotional, sentimental, religious or irrational placebos!
 
.
Sorry, I don't agree with you. There is no such sentiments here except that the little sympathy for the Srilankan Tamils. Most people don't care about Srilanka or Srilankan Tamils.

When V Gopalsamy (called as Vaiko) was arrested under POTA for speaking in support of LTTE, he had to spend around an year alone behind the bars. Even there was no public support to him.

There was a movement in the past that is too based on Dradvian idealogy. That movement was not so popular amaong the public. Only few groups wanted a seperate nation, that is too due to the anti-brahmin (or anti-aryan) politics. It had died long ago.

There was a ground swell sympathy for Sri Lankan Tamils and I have felt it myself during and after the Indian involvement.

It has waned, but there is still support for them amongst some sections of Tamilandu.
 
. .
I agree that not all Muslims are terrorists, but its reality that most terrorists are muslims. Nobody is aginst Islam, but as long as muslims sympathise Jihad, they will be victims. The muslim world should rise up against the terrorists to prove that they are not part of it.
 
.
There was a ground swell sympathy for Sri Lankan Tamils and I have felt it myself during and after the Indian involvement.

I think that you are talking about the issues around IPKF mission to Sri Lanka. That is purely a DMK vs Congress game. The DMK exploited the situation and there were protests and bitter statements.

IPKF was a mistake in my opinion. If we decided to help Sri Lankan Govt. then, we should had wiped out the LTTE from air. Both the Sri Lankan army and the LTTE were against us that time. Even Rajiv Gandhi was hit by a SL soldier. Unfortunately our soldiers caught between the civilians, SL army and the LTTE.

It has waned, but there is still support for them amongst some sections of Tamilandu.

You are right that there are still sympathy. There is no such seperatist movement in TN.
 
.
What is Dradvian ideology?

My mistake. It is "Dravidian".

Actually there is no such ideology. It was created by the policians for vote bank politics. According to this ideology, there is NO GOD.
 
.
My mistake. It is "Dravidian".

Actually there is no such ideology. It was created by the policians for vote bank politics. According to this ideology, there is NO GOD.

Thats Amazing ideology what you think is there is any GOD ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom