Kyusuibu Honbu
BANNED
- Joined
- May 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,305
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
Self-delete
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Er.....edit the bolded part to Banglaistan,as it seems a bit derogatory,atleast for the Bangladeshi members here excluding Al-zakir and Idune.
India stolen Bangladesh intellectual rights over our tradition on Nakshi katha, Jamdani sari and fazli mango and claimed rights over thousands of year old Bangladeshi tradition.
When india filed falsified rights with WTO Awami Indian stooge regime did not submit Bangladeshi claim on these nor did protest outright robbery by Indians.
Report in Bangla:
Amardesh Online Edition
Hindustan is worth nothing if we take out the contribution of Islamic and British dynasty. Hindus has nothing to offer to the world. Lal-Qila to Taj and then Sherwani to Biryani is our contribution. So I do not expect anything less from the thieves.
Hindustan is worth nothing if we take out the contribution of Islamic and British dynasty. Hindus has nothing to offer to the world. Lal-Qila to Taj and then Sherwani to Biryani is our contribution. So I do not expect anything less from the thieves.
Why derogatory? The term Bangistan along with Mughalistan and some other stans coined by some loonies long time ago. The colloquial meaning of the word 'Bangi'(in my part of Bengal) is deceit, which fits well with the Stan idea!
Wait a minute did you find stan a derogatory word btw?
Oh!Didn't know that,i thought you were meaning "bang" as in English slang term for engaging in a sexual act.
Bangladesh was founded by parition of Indian Bengal. Hence it doesnt have a distinct identity of it own other than the Islamic traditions. India can verily claim whatever Bengali traditions have to offer.
Over the period of 50 years Pakistan has carved an identity of its own to an extent that Indians and Pakistanis can be significantly differenciated by a third person. Such was not the case of first and second generation Pakistani's. The short sighted Bengalis fueled by Indian financed nationalism suddently felt threatened by this evolution of indentity and decided to revolt. Today the Bangladesh identity crisis is at its peak. It is truly evolving into a sovergien state without soverginty. It doesnt know where is stands. One side it feels socially threatend by India on other side it cant make up its mind about history. Wether it was created in 1947 by Jinnah or 1971 by Mukhti Bahini?? Bengladesh wouldnt even be a country if it was not for Mr Jinnah. In essence they have taken a reverse gear back to 1947 when confusion prevailed and common sense lacked.
No not Staan it derrived from Sthaan(sanskrit) how can they accept it???
It even has Persian, but Persian were not Arabs they had their own culture similar to ours. Zoros. Right?? That's why Iran recognizes culutral and traditional similarities with us.
Ancient history of Greece is still called that despite the presence of numerous city states with seperate armies, economies and political systems. Yet despite this, they are still called "Greek"
Same is true for many countries. History of America before it got independence is still called History of America. Go figure. By your definition even China had seperate kingdoms throughout a long period of its history and thus cannot be called a country before a certain time? Same would be true on nearly every nation on earth then
Btw do check Maurya empire, Kushan and satavahana dynasty, Pala Empire, Mughal Empire and Maratha empire. They ruled pretty much over all of india and had an army, etc, etc
But of course you're not gonna check them out. How will you when they refute your point. Nope, you will post another baseless and irrelevant rant.
Bangladesh should change her name to Bangistan to stay true to her middle-east root. Go tiger, sands of Arabia calling you! :p
At least I'll get a thank from Mr. Al-Zakir now.
You still dont understand the concept of India.....I am Tamil and am an Indian, that is how India functions. You have your own local identity and your national pride. You can't understand India ever. So you better not talk about the culture and language of India. because everything has dissolved in a single ideology called as India. A Bengali is as much an Indian as I am.