What's new

India steps into Philippines-China spat over South China Sea

We dont care the opinion from the unttachables.

:lol: and after this statements of yours, I can clearly see how much your people care for Dalits whom you want to liberate from India.. Mind it, such statements in most parts of India can land any one into serious trouble!!
 
yes, it is.
But before that , human rights of ordinary citizen of china matters most which must be restore and incresed to the acceptable levels, dont you think so.

To the wise indians what should matter the most is the human rights of their own citizens not the human rights of the Chinese citizens.
 
:lol: and after this statements of yours, I can clearly see how much your people care for Dalits whom you want to liberate from India.. Mind it, such statements in most parts of India can land any one into serious trouble!!

Caste system works
 
To the wise indians what should matter the most is the human rights of their own citizens not the human rights of the Chinese citizens.

Nah, wise man cares for poor and exploited where ever they see them and that is why we cared about the human rights of Bangladeshis in 1971, the time when Pakistani Army were on Bangla speaker killing spree!!

Filipinos stick to your grounds, you will get all the help needed against the bully.. Not too long back, we have seen what happened to Iraq when it tried to occupy Kuwait!! That should serve a good example to Chinese kids here!!
 
India Takes Middle Road in Manila-Beijing Dispute

India’s Ministry of External Affairs urged China and the Philippines to “exercise restraint” and resolve their brewing row over ownership of a set of islands in the South China Sea through diplomacy.

New Delhi’s position is notable because it shows the country will not always side with China’s opponents in territorial disputes, as many might assume.

But by raising its voice, India also is signaling it’s ready to assume a larger diplomatic role in the region, part of a “Look East” policy that since its inception in the 1990s has come to little but in recent months appears to be taking shape.

The longstanding ownership row over the small islands – known as Scarborough Shoal in the Philippines and Huangyan in China – has erupted again in the past month after Manila intercepted Chinese fishing vessels in the area.

A large anti-Chinese demonstration is planned for today in Manila and Beijing has warned its citizens over travel to the Philippines.

One might have imagined that India would either not respond to the kerfuffle or come down on the side of the Philippines, given its historic antagonism with China.

India and China fought a 1962 border war that Beijing won. The frontier between the two countries remains unsettled. Tensions have risen further in recent months over India’s growing role in the South China Sea, which Beijing claims almost in its entirety.

New Delhi’s goal in the region is two-fold. It wants to secure oil and gas assets in the South China Sea to meet growing demand at home for energy. And it wants to act as a counterweight to China in the area, whose islands are also claimed by the Philippines, Vietnam and other Asian countries.

Beijing’s decision to build its own naval presence in the Indian Ocean, New Delhi’s backyard, has added to frictions.

To develop its approach, India has been stepping up diplomatic and security cooperation with countries in East Asia that share New Delhi’s concerns about what they see as China’s growing assertiveness.

Some recent incidents have unnerved Indian policymakers. China last year warned ONGC, India’s state-owned oil and gas company, that its joint exploration plans with Vietnam in the South China Sea amounted to a violation of Chinese sovereignty.

So why isn’t India stepping in to back up Manila?

One reason could be that India realizes that a conflict with China probably isn’t winnable
.


Indians were ecstatic last month when the country test fired a nuclear-capable missile with a range covering much of China, a move which pundits here said would deter Beijing from belligerence.

But China’s spending on conventional arms is far outstripping India’s military, which continues to rely on outdated equipment.:rofl:

In the future, India likely sees a path of wary accommodation of China as the most fruitful policy.

What’s more, India is hoping to broaden the foundations of its economic growth by tapping into China’s expansion. The two countries’ bilateral trade jumped to over $60 billion in the year ended March 31, 2011, more than double the figure four years earlier.

Still, India’s decision to speak up at all on the issue of a dispute between China and the Philippines perhaps shows the “Look East” policy is here to stay. And that likely means more diplomatic spats to come in the years ahead in the South China Sea and elsewhere in East Asia.

India Takes Middle Road in Manila-Beijing Dispute - India Real Time - WSJ
 
India Takes Middle Road in Manila-Beijing Dispute

India and China fought a 1962 border war that Beijing won

Ha ha .... :laugh: :laugh:

So, Beijing won; then picked up it's tail and ran back .... and now they cry "South Tibet".

Guys, make up your mind ... if you won, you shouldn't be crying "South Tibet" ... otherwise you only had the guts to pinch a sleeping giant, but made sure that you ran back before the sleeping giant woke up.

China now has a proven record of cowardice:

1. When Japanese invaded China, the chinese went on a LONG MARCH. Ha ha .... :laugh:
2. China could only pinch and run away in 1962. No courage to hold ground against India, even in 1962 when you had 8 times the number of men.
3. Ditto with Vietnam in 1979 ... a "self-proclaimed" victory and then the usual "running back".


Try another 1962 attempt and we'll send you to a LONG MARCH right up to Siberia and then into the Arctic Ocean.
 
Yes please do and do it quickly .......

Good to see you guys getting a little excited. ;)

I understand. You run after those who supported the 71 genocide and rapine of Bangladeshis (China was the primary support behind that rapine and genocide, besides the Nixon administration).

And of course the fact that Chinese hate you as Muslims (along with Japanese and Koreans) and do what they do to their Uighurs and other Muslims is a bonus.

You cower when faced with dictatorship. You start making demands and throwing shoes at Bush when faced with a democracy that may just give a damn.

The Iraqi who threw that shoe at Bush would never dare do that to Saddam. He would know what would happen to his last family member. ;)
 
yes, it is.
But before that , human rights of ordinary citizen of china matters most which must be restore and incresed to the acceptable levels, dont you think so.


Pretty sure ordinary citizens of China have their basic human rights guaranteed, such as the rights to food, rights to education, etc.


Is 2,000,000 children starved to death every year in India an acceptable level to you? How about your education acceptable level?

Perhaps it is acceptable to you, but not to us ordinary human regardless of citizenship.
 
Pretty sure ordinary citizens of China have their basic human rights guaranteed, such as the rights to food, rights to education, etc.


Is 2,000,000 million children starved to death every year in India an acceptable level to you? How about your education acceptable level?

Perhaps it is acceptable to you, but not to us ordinary human regardless of citizenship.

2000000 millionchildren are kidding me.......
 
Back
Top Bottom