What's new

India starts 'visa on arrival' facility for Pakistani senior citizens

So is in Pakistan, what does this post have to do with this thread? :blink:

The discussion started when an Indian said that no one visits Pakistan due to bomb blasts which is indeed a rightful reason but ironicaly the foreigners now reluctant to visit India due to rapes.

so its funny that Indians come up with rants against Pakistan but failed to give protection to forigners even in peace time. The moral of the story is that Pakistan is doing better even in bomb blasts
 
Only reason more rapes happen in US than India is because all U.S rapes are reported

Only 1/10 rapes in India are reported, though.

And how do you know that all rapes in US are reported & only 1/10 rapes in India are reported. Any proof??? :unsure:
 
So is in Pakistan, what does this post have to do with this thread? :blink:

Thank you webmaster for answering his stupid allegation...

To be honest in India only 1/4th of rapes are reported and not 1/10th...any number is worst in this case....
 
In what ?

You people exploit women in the name of Polygamy.

winner in having trust of foreign women during peace time. India lost.

and as far as your statement about polygamy well the world knows that in parts of India many brothers even if they are 12 shares ONE wife.
 
In what ?

You people exploit women in the name of Polygamy.

We all know how women are treated after their husbands die in Hinduism, but that is for another debate. Islam puts those women on same level as any other woman, eliminating prostitution and many other problems.

Now back to topic please...
 
LeT has nothing to do with Pakistan.

Allowing Pakistanis needing medical attention is a gesture based on humanity grounds. Grow up!

LeT is based in Pakistan with primarily Pakistani recruits.

The question Webmaster is whether India should allow any gesture based on humanitarian grounds when Pakistan sponsors Islamic terrorism throughout the globe and particularly in India.

Humanitarian gestures apply to those nations which need assistance and are responsible nations in the comity of nations.
 
winner in having trust of foreign women during peace time. India lost.

and as far as your statement about polygamy well the world knows that in parts of India many brothers even if they are 12 shares ONE wife.

Dude lot of Foreign charity workers are not sparred in the land of pure, how is is a win?

People are not even allowed to do charity in your country.
 
We all know how women are treated after their husbands die in Hinduism, but that is for another debate. Islam puts those women on same level as any other woman, eliminating prostitution and many other problems.

Now back to topic please...

How they were treated earlier. However social reforms have taken place in a major way in India.
Have they in Pakistan? Has polygamy been eliminated? Have hudood ordinances been revoked?
 
:) nice facepalm however the point is not about the rape but about the trust of the foreigners which clearly tilt towards US than India despite your claim of more rapes in US.

This shows you are not favourit destination

I didn't saying India is a favorite destination than U.S. Who cares about trust of foreigners, these type of incidents happen all around the world. If some foreigners lose trust because of rapes and act like it isn't happening elsewhere, what can one say :wave:
 
We all know how women are treated after their husbands die in Hinduism, but that is for another debate. Islam puts those women on same level as any other woman, eliminating prostitution and many other problems.

Now back to topic please...

Webby you are talking about the practices in Hinduism which were banned centuries ago.
 
We all know how women are treated after their husbands die in Hinduism, but that is for another debate. Islam puts those women on same level as any other woman, eliminating prostitution and many other problems.

Now back to topic please...

That was decades ago...:agree:
 
Of course not ......later some innocent pakistani children should get inexpensive medical treatment ....and later innocent paksitani grown ups should also be allowed in for treatment ..... after all they dont work for the ISI....later even ex terrorist and ex milinary personals should be allowed to come in .....after all they too are innocent unless proven guilty. We should follow our dharma ....Pritvi Raj Chauhan did the same ....so should we, rest we should leave to God :disagree:

After all foreign policy should be conducted in accordance with dharma and not pragmatic real politics. ....... I vote for world peace .....now do I get to be miss universe?

Pragmatic reall politics does not mean losing moral fiber and sense of humanity. Do you know why Saladin is spoken of highly in Europe? He was not only victorious but also chivalrous.
 
LeT is based in Pakistan with primarily Pakistani recruits.

The question Webmaster is whether India should allow any gesture based on humanitarian grounds when Pakistan sponsors Islamic terrorism throughout the globe and particularly in India.

Humanitarian gestures apply to those nations which need assistance and are responsible nations in the comity of nations.

There is no such thing as Islamic terrorism.

What the Indian soldiers in uniforms have done and continue to do so is nothing less than terrorism.

Does this mean that Pakistan should stop freeing Indian fisherman, allowing Indians for religious reasons to visit Pakistan? No.

Pakistan as a responsible nation puts politics aside and continues to play its role based on humanitarian grounds, not just with India but throughout the world under the flagship of UN.
 
Back
Top Bottom