India Should Supply Arms To Pakistan To Help Defend Its Borders Against U.S. Attacks

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

India Should Supply Arms To Pakistan To Help Defend Its Borders Against Attacks By The United States

India should supply arms to Pakistan to help defend its borders against attacks by the United States which, as I have said, are attacks on India. This should include the entire range of armaments -- ground, air and naval -- as well as nuclear arms. If Iran is willing to host Indian nuclear armed missiles to defend the region, including Pakistan, from the United States, India should deploy them in Iran also. The same for other countries in the region, such as Syria. As I have said, an occupation of Afghanistan by the firangis is occupation of India. India must act to militarily eject the firangis from Afghanistan without delay. I wrote a decade ago that it is India’s responsibility to eject the United States from the Middle East.

All this requires destroying the traitors in New Delhi first and it is time to do so.

As I have said, the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will open the flood gates to both economic prosperity for India and its nuclear supremacy over the United States and enable it to eliminate this threat, not just to itself but to the world (see my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S. : http://nuclearsupremacyforindiaoverus.blogspot.com ).

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

What Is Nuclear Supremacy?

I have been advocating nuclear supremacy for India over the United States. First I will explain what is meant by nuclear supremacy.
During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union were said to be in a relationship of ’Mutual Assured Destruction’ (MAD), meaning if either side launched a first nuclear strike on the other to destroy the other’s nuclear weapons, cities, etc, the other side will have enough nuclear weapons to survive the first strike to obliterate the side which launched the first strike. The purpose of the anti-ballistic missile treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union was to preserve this state of mutual assured destruction, so that neither side will have an incentive to launch a first strike on the other.
A few years ago, the US unilaterally got out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty and started developing systems to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles. An article in Foreign Affairs magazine about a year ago said that America is now close to nuclear supremacy over Russia, or already has nuclear supremacy, because it can now launch a first strike against Russia and destroy all its nuclear weapons or its ability to launch them because of a severe degradation in the number and readiness of Russia’s nuclear weapons after the disintegration of the Soviet Union and thus destroy Russia with a first strike without being destroyed in return.
India’s Defence Reseach and Development Organisation (DRDO) scientists have said that the systems to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles (of short and medium range), which they recently tested, are superior to the US and within three years they will have systems to shoot down ballistic missiles of intercontinental range (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, or ICBMs) such as the ICBMs posessed by the US (the United States does not and will not have the ability to destroy large numbers of incoming ICBMs).
By saying that India will have nuclear supremacy over the United States, I am saying that India will be able to launch a first strike against the United States and destroy it without being destroyed in return.
For the financial side regarding India’s ability to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States, see my articles ’Technological and Economic Emancipation of India’ and ‘How India’s Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year’.
For the US, striving for nuclear supremacy over all nations of the world is an axiom of its foreign policy. An example of its determination to prevent India from emerging out of slavery is in the following report from ’The Guardian’, dated January 22, 2008 where a former chairman of the United States’ joint chiefs of staff and others talk of a nuclear strike on India (without actually naming it) to keep it in a state of slavery:-

"The West must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the imminent spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO0 by five of the West’s most senior military officers and strategists.

"Calling for root-and-branch reform of NATO and a new pact drawing the US, NATO and the European Union together in a grand strategy to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a first strike nuclear option remains an indispensable instrument since there is simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world.
"The manifesto has been written following discussions with active commanders and policymakers, many of whom are unable or unwilling to publicly air their views. It has been presented to the Pentagon in Washington and to NATO’s secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.
"The risk of further (nuclear) proliferation is imminent and, with it, the danger of a nuclear war, albeit limited in scope, might become possible," the authors argued in the 150-page blueprint for urgent reform of Western military strategy and structures. "The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction.
"The authors -General John Shalikashvili, the former chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff and NATO’s ex-supreme commander in Europe, General Klaus Naumann, Germany’s former top soldier and ex-chairman of NATO’s military committee,General Henk van den Breemen, a former Dutch chief of staff, Admiral Jacques Lanxade, a former French chief of staff, and Lord Inge, field marshal and ex-chief of the general staff and the defence staff in the United Kingdom (UK) - paint an alarming picture of the threats and challenges confronting the West in the post-9/11 world and deliver a withering verdict on the ability to cope."

What if the US makes the first nuclear strike on India well before India has developed a first strike capability against it - such as making a nuclear strike on India this year? Such ’counter-proliferation’ nuclear strikes have been part of the US policy for many years and there is nothing really new in the above recommendation. For many years now, India has had nuclear-armed submarines capable of obliterating the United States’ largest cities on its coasts within striking range of its coastal cities at all times, so the US can make a ’counter-proliferation’ strike on India only at the cost of losing its largest cities.
I have said that India can win an arms race with the United States - India produces about half a million engineering graduates per year against the US’ seventy thousand and has an unlimited amount of investment capital for the necessary research, development and production, which will also greatly benefit its economy as a whole. India has no alternative but to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States and eliminate this threat. All that is needed is a clear cut national commitment to this objective.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

Why Nuclear Supremacy?

I have explained the concept of nuclear supremacy in the article titled “What is nuclear supremacy?”. In this connection, some basic facts have to be understood:
1) The law of the jungle still prevails in international relations. Striving for military supremacy -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- over all nations needs no explanation; its necessity is as obvious as the fact that water flows downwards. Only a country such as India with a thousand year history of slavery to various foreign invaders is unable to see the obvious.
2) Geopolitics, so far as it concerns India and the West, is all about white vs. non-white. The same behavior can have more than one possible explanations; my assertion of the role of race (white/non-white) in determining the United States' behavior toward Indians and India is based on observations made as a behavior scientist in the United States where I have lived for 41 years [see the biography of Satish Chandra -- that's me -- in Marquis' Who's Who In America, 2008 and earlier editions]. What is often referred to as beneficial American 'aid' is actually poison; it is neither needed nor desirable and keeps India from developing its own capabilities. In the nuclear deal, it is not even aid but slavery. The aggressiveness of the United States toward non-white countries is such that there is no option for India but to attain nuclear supremacy over it and put this mad dog to sleep (meaning death). This is the reality and there is nothing very surprising about it. There is no need for India to be another Iran; India has four times the population of the United States and produces 7 times the number of engineers per year that the United States does. It is the effect of a thousand years of slavery and the British rule because of which Indians think of India as an Iran which needs to be afraid of the United States.
3) How did this slavery to the white man come about? An answer is in The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..." Present day Indians’ behaviour is profoundly affected by the terrorization and subjugation inflicted on them by the British. This came on top of the terrorization and subjugation inflicted by Muslim invaders in the preceding 800 years. Since Muslims are no longer strong, Indians are coming out of fear of the Muslims but the fear of the white man keeps getting deeper and deeper as the white man’s power in relation to Indians keeps increasing. India is faced with an even deeper slavery to the Americans with the nuclear deal and all the other prongs it comes with. Attaining strategic nuclear parity, then supremacy and using this supremacy to eliminate this incomparably greater threat, will be India's real War of Independence. One does not need to refer to the holocaust beginning 1857 to know the incomparably greater American threat and its consequences, which I know directly but which remains a secret from the Indian people.
There is a simple way to bring India out of its slavery and identify collaborators in India's slavery to American imperialism. Start with India's Army Chief and ask "Are you in favour of strategic nuclear parity with, or supremacy over, the United States as a national objective?" If the answer is not 'Yes', he should be shot on the spot. The same for all other generals and admirals, etc. The same for Manmohan Singh and members of his Cabinet. The same for leaders of political parties. The same for journalists writing on the nuclear deal. The same for 'strategic analysts', etc.
4) India has no shortage of manpower and my proposal about money (see, for example, my articles ‘How India‘s economy can grow 30% per year’ and ‘India’s technological and economic emancipation’ ) can be used to make India both militarily and economically number 1 in the world but military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- is even more important than economic supremacy because, without it, it can be subjugated and enslaved (let's leave out who does the subjugation and enslavement). All of the invaders who conquered and enslaved India came from much poorer countries than 'the Golden Hind'.
5) Aiming for nuclear parity with the United States, instead of nuclear supremacy over it, is not an option because the United States, by its nature, will always be striving for nuclear supremacy. This threat -- the United States -- must die for India to live.
The following is what I said, in a release to the press some time ago, about strategic nuclear parity with the United States:
The root cause of the national suicide being committed through the nuclear deal is a failure of political parties to demand at least strategic parity with the United States-- parity with the United States requires at least ten thousand nuclear warheads and the missiles to deliver them to continental United States territory-- as an objective and criterion. While the demand for a Constitutional amendment requiring Parliament's ratification of such agreements in the BJP's statement of August 4 '07 is a long-overdue step, a national objective of strategic parity, at a minimum, with all countries of the world, including the United States, is essential to guide such decisions. This is not something optional but essential. I have said "Justice can only be delivered by your weapons" and showed "the supremacy of weapons in matters of justice" (this includes justice as between nations) and said that "The nonsense about 'minimal nuclear deterrence' is seen in the recolonisation of Pakistan, which has a 'minimal nuclear deterrent', by the United States". Just recently, a United States presidential candidate (Clinton) was "refusing to rule out the use of nuclear weapons against Osama bin Laden or other terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan" ( Washingtonpost.com, August 2 '07) and another U.S. presidential candidate (Obama) said he will undertake an "invasion" of Pakistan, which-- if Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons, defends itself-- will inevitably involve the use of nuclear weapons. India is constantly under the same threat, whether spoken or not, in all dealings with the United States. The BJP should look at its own statement dated December 27, 2005 on foreign policy at its National Executive Meeting which says Pakistan "strives for strategic parity" with India and, about "Indo-US relations", says "What must be at the core of our understanding is that 'strategic partnership' is ordinarily between two equals... accepting an asymmetrical relationship is not 'strategic partnership', it would be capitulation... Which is why the UPA's lack of understanding in dealing with the US is so worrying. With the UPA government's obsequious policies [and] a subservient relationship with the United States". The BJP must clearly understand that the "two equals" must, above all, be equal in nuclear weapons. By that I mean equal in nuclear strength, not just in protocol; even the puppet presidents of Iraq and Afghanistan are given guards of honour and treated as equal in protocol by the United States. I have shown that India has the means to quickly and easily not just attain strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States but surpass it in economic prosperity and well-being (see, for example, my article ‘How India’s economy can grow 30% per year’). These objectives must be clearly stated in policy statements. Article 51 of the Constitution, which says "The State shall endeavour to--... (b) maintain just and honorable relations between nations;", must be amended to "The State shall endeavour to--... (b) maintain just and honorable relations between nations by attaining and maintaining strategic parity, at a minimum, with all nations of the world in its weapons and by assisting victims of imperialism acquire necessary weapons, including nuclear weapons;".
This Article (Article 51) of the Constitution, even as it exists now, provides a basis for Constitutional challenges, in court, to foreign policy acts that constitute "obsequious policies" toward and "subservient relationship" with the United States or that make India's foreign policy serve the United States' imperialist policies toward Iraq and Iran, etc. Recently the Supreme Court rejected a PIL seeking direction to the Central Government to seek Parliament's approval for the nuclear deal on the grounds that it would be interference in the government's treaty-making powers (a Constitutional amendment will be needed for that), but my PIL dated July 20, 2007 seeks "action against the Prime Minister, such as dismissal from office and prosecution for treason, for violating his oath of office to uphold the sovereignty of India by making joint statements, agreements and negotiations with the United States, in connection with said nuclear deal, that are highly injurious to such sovereignty ....", as indeed is clear even without the Hyde Act but particularly if, for example, the 123 agreement is read in conjunction with the Hyde Act. I have not heard anything from the Supreme Court regarding my PIL but if more such PILs are filed, seeking action against the Prime Minister on the grounds of violating his oath of office (which is in the Third Schedule of the Constitution) to uphold India's sovereignty, it will get the Supreme Court's attention-- and no Constitutional amendment is needed for PILs on these grounds.
You cannot uphold the country's sovereignty without the weapons to defend and uphold its sovereignty, which requires strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States. The nuclear deal, in all its aspects and processes-- joint statements, agreements, negotiations, etc.-- injures India's ability to attain strategic (nuclear) parity with the United States and, thus, injures India's ability to defend and uphold its sovereignty and, thus, injures India's sovereignty and constitutes failure to uphold India's sovereignty. This is so even if there were no Hyde Act, no 123 agreement, etc. or no deal is finally signed or executed.
Article 51 of the Constitution also requires India's government to endeavour to eliminate threats to just and honorable relations between nations and, since the United States is the principal transgressor of and threat to such relations between nations, endeavour to attain strategic nuclear supremacy over the United States and take measures, military and non-military, to eliminate this threat.
For other countries of the world, this means getting out of the United States-sponsored denial regimes such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group, International Atomic Energy Agency, etc. and helping each other acquire nuclear weapons to cope with this threat to just and honorable relations between nations.

As I have shown above, even India’s Constitution requires striving to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

Willingness To Use Nuclear Weapons Is The Most Important Component Of National Security & Prosperity

In my letter dated June 27, 2004, (see my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.'), I wrote “Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness -- perceived by yourself and others -- to use your arms is zero, their value -- deterrent and other -- is zero. The United States has a decisive advantage -- ideological, economic and military -- over the rest of the world because of its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms.” This applies as much to the use of nuclear arms within the country against agents of a foreign power -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will be the first such use of nuclear arms -- as outside the country. Also, as I have repeatedly emphasised, nuclear arms against the United States are needed not to “deter” it but to actually destroy it because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy, that is, to overcome deterrence. In other words, the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed. For this India needs nuclear supremacy over the United States and a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads -- an objective that is well within India’s reach; attaining this objective requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi first (see my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.').

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

Source of Manmohan Singh’s ‘Deep Love’ For Bush

Indian politicians have condemned Manmohan Singh’s telling Bush that the people of India “deeply love” him. They should see the source of Indians’ love for the white man as I explained many months ago (see my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' ) :-

“There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man, woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians…. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India [she was treated as the empress of India even before she held any party or government post and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her at her residence; this was so even during BJP governments at the Center]. … In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. … The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love [emphasis added]; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India …), for India’s nuclear supremacy to go forward.”

Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, Indians in a position to obstruct India’s nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country will be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi (see my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' ).

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

First a note about hate: In army training, for example in bayonet practice, you are taught to hate the enemy; it is essential if you are to survive and win. On Bharat Rakshak forum, the operatives of CIA-RAW, through the numerous anti-Muslim, anti-Pakistan threads they nurture, direct the aggression of Indians toward other Indians while they suppress any mention of the necessity to defend against the real enemy -- the ’white man’ and the most powerful ’white country’, the United States. In a letter to the press in 1998, just before Atal Behari Vajpayee assumed office as the Prime Minister of India, I wrote, referring to IK Gujral’s statement as prime minister about the necessity for Indians to inculcate the scientific spirit in themselves, about the necessity for Indians to inculcate in themselves “hatred for the white man (and woman),” to which Vajpayee replied, “hate is not on the agenda,” to which I replied that this amounted to saying “defence is not on the agenda.” The agenda remains unfulfilled. It will move ahead with the destruction of New Delhi with a nuclear detonation and will be fulfilled with the delivery of 10,000 nuclear warheads to the United States.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

The same behavior can have more than one possible explanations; my assertion of the role of race (white/non-white) in determining the United States' behavior toward Indians and India is based on observations made as a behavior scientist in the United States where I have lived for 42 years. What you refer to as beneficial American 'aid' is actually poison; it is neither needed nor desirable and keeps India from developing its own capabilities. In the nuclear deal, it is not even aid but slavery. The aggressiveness of the United States toward non-white countries is such that there is no option for India but to attain nuclear supremacy over it and put this mad dog to sleep (meaning death). This is the reality and there is nothing very surprising about it. There is no need for India to be another Iran; India has four times the population of the United States and produces 7 times the number of engineers per year that the United States does. It is the effect of a thousand years of slavery and the British rule because of which Indians think of India as an Iran which needs to be afraid of the United States.
To repeat: geopolitics, so far as it concerns India and the West, is all about white vs. non-white. The role of race within India can be seen from this: according to the post office that serves the area where a lot of politicians live, Sonia gets over 50,000 letters per month. Manmohan Singh and Advani get less than 2,500 each. Vajpayee, when prime minister, got less than 1,000. The sole reason for this is that she is white. The terrorization and subjugation to the white man that Indians underwent through the holocaust perpetrated by the British after 1857, killing over 10 million in 10 years (see my blog 'Nuclear Supremacy for India Over U.S.' ), is responsible for this fact. The result is the inferior Indian niggers, criminal blackie slaves that Kipling and others wrote about -- and their writings are still prescribed reading in Indian schools! Indians by and large think of themselves as inferior Indian niggers in relation to the white man and this is evident in a thousand ways from their behavior (after I had made this posting, I found in The Telegraph of January 25 '08, a column by Swapan Dasgupta beginning with a quotation from Kipling and he says in this column: "it is undeniable that India’s perceptions of Britons were couched in terms of admiration, reverence, awe and a tinge of fear. This was as true for Anglophiles as they were for those who suffered and fought for freedom. Of course, there was a flip side too. The white man was felt to be lacking in personal hygiene and his food habits were completely suspect. Nevertheless, on balance, the sahib came out of the encounter as someone who had earned the right to forge an empire. It, therefore, followed that if Indians were to usurp that right they would have to imbibe the virtues of hard work, forbearance, team spirit, enterprise and sacrifice. A minority of Indians also wanted fair play and decency to be tagged to the attributes of good character". India's "leaders" that you thank God for are more or less the inferior Indian niggers this columnist is). This will only change after India attains nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country and eliminates the threat it poses to countries like India.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

Sometimes killing traitors within the country is necessary before an external enemy can be dealt with. In this nuclear age, a nuclear solution can deal with traitors within the country. A single nuclear detonation, arranged by DRDO and the nuclear scientists, centered on RAW headquarters will rid India of RAW, the traitor politicians and civil servants and the top brass of the worse than worthless military. Since there are very few DRDO and nuclear installations around New Delhi, India’s military and economic strength will not be damaged.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

DRDO’s task:
DRDO's central task is delivering thousands of pure fusion bombs ( see my article in Cental Chronicle, Bhopal: centralchronicle dot com slash 20080329/2903307 dot htm ) or other thermonuclear weapons to the continental United States territory. DRDO will fulfil this task. Equally important is DRDO's task, along with the nuclear scientists', of ridding India of traitors. As I have said, a single nuclear detonation, centered on RAW headquarters, will rid India of RAW, the traitor politicians and civil servants and the top brass of the worse than worthless military. A skeletal staff of just a few dozen based in Hyderabad can perform the functions of the Central Government -- giving instructions to and answering questions from the State governments and other entities and providing them with funds in accordance with my proposal about money ( described in my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy for India Over U.S.' ). Insofar as there is the slightest uncertainty about the yield and reliability of India's thermonuclear weapons -- or even if there is not -- further testing should be done.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

The rule is: anyone in government who is not oriented toward and committed to supremacy over the United States -- the most powerful white country -- is oriented toward and committed to slavery to the United States and is a traitor deserving death. The orientation toward and commitment to supremacy over the United States must be vocal and explicit. At present India’s government -- for example all civil servants from the top to the bottom -- consists of traitors.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

Destroying New Delhi:
Who will be destroyed by the nuclear bomb in New Delhi besides the Laloo Yadavs and Chatterjees (see my blog 'Nuclear Supremacy for India Over U.S.')? A bent old man who bent even lower to the Yadavs the day after he recorded the Yadavs, with bags of money, facilitating the invasion of India by firangis and was himself recorded, with folded hands, paying obeisance to the Yadavs. The military and the civil servants who have always been loyal to the firangis (see same blog). The population of Delhi/New Delhi which, by the hundreds of thousands, stood and watched silently India’s emperor, after surrendering his sword, arrested and led away by a lone Englishman with “fifty black sowars” -- the Englishman sent the Indian emperor’s jewel-encrusted sword to the British monarch -- though, as the Englishman wrote home to England, anyone of them -- his fifty black sowars -- could have brought him down with a single shot.
Why did the Indian emperor have to surrender his sword to the lone firangi and submit to being arrested? He had a sword but he lacked supremacy in arms. Today supremacy in arms is nuclear supremacy. No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India. These are the people who will be destroyed.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

In India, the military and civil servants have always been loyal to the firangis, as I showed in the addendum dated July 25, 2008, titled 'The Day India's Emperor Was Arrested By A Lone Englishman' in my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy for India Over U.S.' . In addition, as I said in the same addendum, "No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India" (see my article titled 'Why Nuclear Supremacy?' in addendum dated July 19, 2008, same blog ) and thus the entire population of Delhi/New Delhi consists of traitors. That is why killing off the politicians, the military, the civil servants and the rest of the population of Delhi/New Delhi with a nuclear bomb is necessary to save India as a whole; the ban against the firangis can then be enforced in the rest of India till India has ten thousand nuclear warheads and can kill off the entire population of the most powerful firangi country.

Like the recent bomb blasts in Bangalore and Ahmedabad and the firing along the Line of Control in J & K, the Amarnath land row, "the worst communal flare-up … since 1947" (Hindustan Times), has been instigated by C.I.A.-RAW to take attention away from the firangi enemy and his invasion of India with the IAEA inspections, etc. -- just as the communal riots in 1947 were instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which, as I have said, remained loyal to the British after 1947, so the stupid Indians killed one another by the millions while keeping the top firangi, Mountbatten, Governor General of "independent" India. As I have repeatedly said (see my letter dated May 15, 2004, same blog) "No more than about 80,000 British, women and children included, ruled India for centuries. Nothing that can be said about the stupidity and slavisheness of Indians will be an exaggeration.” But, with a nuclear bomb killing a few million of these stupid Indians in Delhi/New Delhi, India as a whole can be saved (see my articles 'Imminent End Of Firangi Rule Over India' in the addendum dated July 19, 2008 and 'After The Destruction Of New Delhi' in addendum dated July 30, 2008, same blog ).

India’s media have continued to shut out the views of India’s greatest scientist while the mediocre Indian who was given the Nobel prize as a dummy substitute for him ( see addendum dated July 30, 2008, same blog) is going to address India’s parliament, according to Indian press reports. Such goings on cannot be allowed.
In the addendum dated August 1, 2008, same blog, I referred to “thousands of headlines that are missing from India’s media”. But theirs are not simply crimes of omission; some of them participate in the crimes they are covering up. As I said in the addendum dated August 1, 2008, all Indian media are controlled by the firangis. The media people in Delhi/New Delhi will also die in the nuclear explosion that will destroy Delhi/New Delhi.

The participation by the media in these crimes has had the direst consequences for India, economically, militarily and strategically. A columnist (Tavleen Singh) two decades ago referred to the rewards for such participation such as “senior journalists” being given, “virtually free”, government accomodations in New Delhi that would rent at a minimum of fifty thousand rupees per month at market rates (now they would rent at several lakhs per month) -- upon which she was sent on C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored junkets to the United States to see how well mediocre Indians (like Amartya Sen) were doing at U. S. universities and now she has been an enthusiastic participant in these crimes for many years -- but such participation extends all across the media, from “lifafa” journalists (a term used on Bharat-Rakshak for journalists who receive envelopes full of cash from the American embassy) to those who simply aspire for a green card. Others participate without any specific inducement. But the participation is universal. A non-specific destruction of New Delhi by a nuclear bomb -- except that it will be centered on RAW headquarters -- will destroy the media also non-specifically.

Arun Shourie, after he was no longer chief editor of the Times Of India, said “Akhbar nahin, sarkar hai” (it is not a newspaper, it is the Government). But the same applies to the media as a whole. Shourie first received documentation of the crimes against India’s greatest scientist in 1982, sent by Indians at a U.S. university who knew of Shourie’s fame. With a Ph.D. in Economics from a U.S. university, he was undoubtedly a member of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Strategy that Vajpayee formed to steal my proposal about money (see same blog). His columns against the nuclear deal do not make him any less of a participant in the above crimes. I received ‘coverage’ from a reporter from The Asian Age who was waiting to interview me, of all the candidates, after I filed my nomination from the East Delhi Lok Sabha constituency in 1996, to learn my “strategy” for winning and, after the election, the provincial head of the Congress Party showed knowledge of the fruits of that interview -- not because it was published -- and commented to me on the futility of my running since I was not known to the public. The media people who will die in the nuclear explosion that will destroy Delhi/New Delhi will include both those who are known and those who are unknown to the public.

Of all the PILs to the Supreme Court regarding the nuclear deal, only mine had asked for the removal from office and prosecution of Manmohan Singh for treason and violation of his oath of office by failing to uphold India’s sovereignty and the Supreme Court has failed to act on my PIL (I have pointed out in addendums below that whereas the Supreme Court has dismissed various PILs regarding the nuclear deal on various grounds, it cannot dismiss mine because my PIL points to violations of specific provisions of the Constitution by specific acts by a specific individual and seeks a specific remedy; so it has simply failed to act on mine). In doing so, the Supreme Court is also participating in the cover up of the above crimes against India’s greatest scientist and the greatest Indian of all time that were pointed to in the PIL and is, thus, participating in those crimes. The loyalty of the judiciary, no less than that of the military and the civil servants, has always been to the firangi and the judiciary in all its aspects -- from robes and language to the enforcement of British-made laws -- is a flagrant continuation of firangi rule over India. The nuclear bomb explosion in New Delhi/Delhi that will destroy firangi rule over India will destroy the Supreme Court also.

The criminals of the Supreme Court, loyal as they are to the firangis (above), could not give a hoot for India’s sovereignty and they show it in their behaviour. India’s Parliament, from the Speaker to individual MPs, has also shown its indifference to India’s sovereignty. The surrender of India’s sovereignty by the Executive is known to everyone. India’s sovereignty rests only in me. I am India’s sovereign.

Indians as a rule are inferior Indian ******* unfit to talk about strategic matters, especially when it involves the White Master in any way, which it always does. That is why in his only reference to India in his 'Mein Kampf', Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else". It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people did that from various countries for a thousand years.

A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though some think three million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them).

I am an Indian, but as far above the other Indians as an avatar is above ordinary mortals.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

PRESS RELEASE August 17, 2008: The Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi/Delhi

The peril to India -- the invasion of India in the form of IAEA inspections etc. and being bound in the deepest slavery -- requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi, not tanks and fighter planes. The RAW-organized “Azadi” rally in Kashmir this week with the RAW-mouthpiece, Times of India, carrying a celebratory headline of “azadi in air” as did other Indian media, not in Kashmir but in New Delhi/ Delhi itself (the celebratory headlines about the nuclear deal are similarly RAW-inspired) and the failure of the armed forces to destroy RAW -- a branch of the C.I.A. against India -- represent the depth and duration of C.I.A. control of India which requires a nuclear explosion to destroy. About a decade ago, when the Indian Air force was sending planes to Sri Lanka to deal with the LTTE, I wrote that it should bomb and destroy the RAW headquarters in New Delhi instead and the problem in Sri Lanka will automatically be solved. This is also true of all separatist movements in India, all terrorism and will remove the principal impediment to India’s technological, economic and military strength. But the military itself is loyal to the firangis, as are politicians, the civil servants and the people of New Delhi/ Delhi. The four million inhabitants of the Kashmir Valley -- who have driven out all the Hindus, in an act of ethnic cleansing, into refugee camps where they remain -- could in principle be herded into an extermination circle and killed with a nuclear explosion but that would not destroy firangi rule over India or rule by C.I.A.-RAW which requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi itself.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

PRESS RELEASE August 19-21, 2008: Why Destruction of New Delhi/Delhi Rather Than of Separatists, etc.?

It needs to be emphasized that the traitor politicians and others in New Delhi need to be destroyed more than the separatists in Kashmir, for example, because the separatism in Kashmir and elsewhere, with its ancillary problems, is a product of and under the control of C.I.A.-RAW and the politicians, by keeping silent about this, are collaborating in it. The same about terrorism and all of India’s economic problems. By keeping silent about the central role of the United States in engendering -- through C.I.A.-RAW -- separatism and terrorism in India and in keeping India economically and militarily weak and by collaborating, by silence or otherwise, in bringing India into the deepest slavery to the United States through the nuclear deal, the politicians are collaborating with India’s number one enemy, the United States, which bribes them and keeps them, in and out of office, as its puppets. If the postponement of the Parliament session is to enable the nuclear deal to go through first, the politicians are not filling the jails (‘Jail Bharo’) against the imposition of this slavery to the United States by an illegitimate government but on ancillary issues -- such as Amarnath -- which are simply byproducts of American-inspired, through C.I.A.-RAW, separatism timed to take attention away from the invasion and enslavement of India through the nuclear deal. If the postponement of the Parliament session is to avoid dying in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/Delhi, that only shows that the politicians are aware of their own treason. With a thousand year history of slavery, treason and slavery come naturally to Indians and, since the Indians in New Delhi/Delhi are the ones obstructing a change in this state of affairs, they are the ones who have to be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/Delhi. This objective will be achieved even if they stay away from New Delhi/ Delhi. An indefinite postponement of the Parliament session does not mean postponement of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi.
Despite what I said in the addendum dated July 30, 2008 below about the mediocre Indian (Amartya Sen) being the firangis’ dummy substitute for me and in the press release of August 7 ‘08 about India’s media shutting out the news and views of India’s greatest scientist, that mediocre Indian was brought to address India’s Parliament which, though in recess, was summoned for this purpose by calling meetings of all 20 or so of its committees on that day. This is only the latest in the series of crimes -- the worst in the history of mankind -- going on for the past three decades. As I said on August 7 ‘08, this cannot be allowed.
As I have said before, after India’s nuclear first strike on the United States, the Americans will be eating each other, including skin, innards and bones, till no one remains alive. Indians will not be eating each other; after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi, they will leave the ground of the capital region covered with bleaching bones.
Killing a few million Indians in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi is nothing more than killing cockroaches. It will not make even a dent in India’s economic or military strength. On the other hand, it will open the flood gates to both economic prosperity for India and its nuclear supremacy over the United States and enable India to eliminate its number one enemy.
In the press release dated August 17 ‘08 below, I referred to Hindus in Kashmir having been driven out in an act of “ethnic cleansing”. But ethnically Kashmiri Hindus are identical to Kashmiri Muslims who are simply converted Hindus, converted by militarily stronger invaders. The same is true of the rest of the subcontinent’s Muslims. The separatism in Kashmir now or elsewhere in the subcontinent in 1947 is and was simply a consequence of Indians’ failure to have military supremacy. The cockroaches in New Delhi/ Delhi, who do not want military, that is nuclear, supremacy for India now cannot be exterminated soon enough. I am the only one calling for nuclear supremacy for India and pointing out that the so-called nuclear deal is utterly incompatible with India’s nuclear supremacy over the United States. The cockroaches of the media who are failing to report what I am saying and the rest of the cockroaches in New Delhi/ Delhi who are collaborating in the cover up of the news and views of India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, all deserve and will get the swiftest death.
The conversion of Hindus to Muslims occurred because of the failure of Indians to have military supremacy over the Muslim invaders. But the separatism in 1947 and now was and is a consequence of Indians’ failure to have military supremacy over the firangis; as I have said, the communal riots, aimed at breaking up India, in 1947 were instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which remained loyal to the British after 1947 and the separatism in Kashmir and elsewhere now is instigated and controlled by RAW which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India. All of the government policies, including the nuclear deal, which keep India technologically, economically and militarily weak and enslaved to the firangi, are dictated by C.I.A.-RAW which controls the politicians, the civil servants, the military and the media and, through the media, controls the population. India’s independence now requires military, that is nuclear, supremacy over the firangis. The firangi and, in particular, the most powerful firangi country, the United States, is the enemy to destroy now. This requires first destroying the firangi’s agents in New Delhi/ Delhi -- the politicians, the civil servants, the military and the media. The people of New Delhi/ Delhi, like the residents of Delhi in 1858 who, by the hundreds of thousands, silently stood and watched the arrest of India’s emperor by a lone firangi (described below), are also collaborators in India’s slavery to the firangi and will be destroyed.
I have referred to a few million Indians dying in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi. In fact even a twenty kiloton blast, which will kill fewer, can be effective in destroying the firangi rule over India, so long as it destroys the RAW headquarters and the main government complexes. The point is that it is better to kill too many, right up to the entire population of New Delhi/ Delhi, than too few. Some of the newspaper offices are on Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, technically in Old Delhi. Because of the sprawling nature of New Delhi, Akashvani and Doordarshan offices, for example, are a fair distance from the main government complexes. Convenience decides the size of the blast.

 

[SatishChandra's Assistant]

PRESS RELEASE SEPTEMBER 3, 2008 The Nuclear Destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi Will Go Ahead Regardless of the Empty Noises of the Political Parties
In the addendum of December 12 ‘06 to January 9 ‘07, below, I wrote “Mukherjee’s confidence that despite some “political flak” the deal will get through was based on knowing that the BJP and the Left leaders also will obey their American bribe-givers..”. For over three years, I have suggested below numerous ways, both inside and outside Parliament, some of them extremely easy any one of which would have instantly blocked the deal. The treachery of the BJP and the CPI(M) is even more treacherous than that of the Congress party because whereas the latter’s treachery is open and visible, the former have been making noises against the nuclear deal for over three years while shunning any effective steps to block the deal that were available to them and, in fact, supporting the deal with the other side of their mouths (welcoming IAEA inspections in the case of the CPI(M), “strategic partnership” with the U.S. and letting the deal go through & simply renegotiating it if we come to power, in the case of the BJP). A former director of RAW wrote that the CPI(M) waited to withdraw support until alternative support from the Samajwadi Party was available for the nuclear deal to the Congress party. For the BJP traitors, British colonial rule over India in which millions of Indians fought for the British in Mesopotamia (now Iraq), in North Africa, in China in the Opium Wars to impose opium imports on China, against India’s emperor in 1857, etc., was a “strategic partnership”. Calling bribery of MPs “horse trading” (horse trading is legal; bribery is not), proceeding at a snail’s pace in the parliamentary committee inquiry to let the deal go through first, failing to file a criminal complaint or to directly go to the Supreme Court demanding dismissal of the prime minister for failing to uphold his oath of office or putting the deal on hold till the inquries are complete, etc., are part of the hundreds of ways the political parties have been collaborating in letting the deal through. The media and others are participating in this. The noises being made now by the political parties opposing the nuclear deal are no different from the noises they have been periodically making in the past; the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will take place regardless of such noises.