nForce
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,910
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Okay, let's break it down. for starters, let's drop the use of third-person terminologies and correctly identify the actors and articulate our thoughts.He is saying the right thing.
If Kashmir dispute is not resolved on table then it will open the gates of war in the region. A hell fire burning both nations and one who will survive will be victorious. These are harsh facts. Right now Pakistan is not very much dependant upon Kashmir for survival, but in future decade Kashmir will be crucial for Pakistan existence and both countries know that......
I don't know why such morons here are criticizing him...... it's bitter truth, if u don't admit it then it can't be helped......
1. If Kashmir dispute is not resolved on table then it will open the gates of war in the region. - Why ? And who will fight this war ?
2. A hell fire burning both nations and one who will survive will be victorious. - Again who or what are the parties ?
3. Right now Pakistan is not very much dependant upon Kashmir for survival, but in future decade Kashmir will be crucial for Pakistan existence and both countries know that - No, we don't know anything of that sort. Why Kashmir is crucial for Pakistan's existence ? How are saying that with conviction ?
I'm trying to understand what's going on, so that we can be on the same page.