Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please mate, this will only force all fanboys to a statement, just wait till it is inducted and we have all of the specs available (MMR performance, which weapons, t/w ratio...). Technically both are at the same level, I guess that should be enough for now or?A bit off Topic,
But Can someone please advise if LCA is a better or at par with JF 17? I heard its turning radius is not very impressive and it takes more than 800 Meter runway to take its flight. I have just heard all this so please don't pounce on me. I just expect an honest comparision with JF 17.
i heard HAL achieved 100% indegeneous capability to produce flankers. Then why do we need to buy them from russia at the first place. someone explain, thanks.
Sir, are you sure about this. The popular thought was always that the original number was 230. Can you please post a link regarding this, not to back your point, just for my interest.
thanks
Too bad India didn't go for the SU-35 it's a better A2A fighter but i guess India's requirements is a dual seat multi role.
i heard HAL achieved 100% indegeneous capability to produce flankers. Then why do we need to buy them from russia at the first place. someone explain, thanks.
Too bad India didn't go for the SU-35 it's a better A2A fighter but i guess India's requirements is a dual seat multi role.
Too bad India didn't go for the SU-35 it's a better A2A fighter but i guess India's requirements is a dual seat multi role.
Wrong again. LCA is supposed to replace mig21 and BISONs not MRCA.
A bit off Topic,
But Can someone please advise if LCA is a better or at par with JF 17? I heard its turning radius is not very impressive and it takes more than 800 Meter runway to take its flight. I have just heard all this so please don't pounce on me. I just expect an honest comparision with JF 17.
So was I, just quoted you to get ur opinon and the one you quoted at once. So don't take it as a offence!Before commenting on your figures let me tell you, all we are doing here are bringing out our own imagination mixed with a little bit of facts.
No, MoD officially stated that the full deal will go only to a single vendor! Search the MMRCA thread, I posted a source some times.MMRCA is not yet clear, whether it will go to one vendor or two different vendors. Who knows to speed up procurement IAF may go for 2 vendors 100 each. IAF has experience in handling mirage. So it may very well be Rafale and F-18. But these are all speculation going around.
For Russia, but as far as the actual stage of development is, these will not have the NG AL 41 engine, but "only" the S117, wonder if IAF would go for this version, if at all. I still have some doubts about that, because it would make the whole doctrine with main fighter must be twin seat config useless right? As long as no contract is signed, or an official MoD member announce this, I will remain sceptical about Pak Fa.I was not taking about FGFA. I was taking about PAK-FA. Do not forget IAF will be getting 50 PAK-FA and 200 FGFA. So PAK-FA will start coming by 2016 and FGFA 2018 (as per reports).
We also know that the engine deal for MK2 is for 100+50 optional, so I only take these 190 as possible for IAF, till other reliable sources say something else, but of course it will also remain on HAL and the production rate.Lets not jump our gun on LCA-MK2. We know IAF is getting 40 LCA. As I said in my previous post the final number for LCA will depends upon its performance.
Different class yes, but they use the same weapons and are even more capable in the strike role than the Migs. MKI also replaced all Mig 23 squads as far as I know.MKI and mig27 are all together in different class. I am not sure about the number of mig27 we have by 2020. 10 years too long a period. As far as I know all the mig23 are phased out of IAF. If you can provide me any source that it is now used as a trainer for mig27, I will be more than happy.
MiG-23UM [Flogger]
The MiG-23UMs , the two seater variants of the Ground Attack and Interceptor units will have a continued innings, thanks to their role as type-trainers with the MiG-27 Units.
MiG-27 UPG 16 + 2 UMs(23)
MiG-27 ML 16 + 2 UMs(23)
Planed yes, but delays in its development causes MRCA and later MMRCA. The interceptor role will most likely go to LCA of course, but the replacement in numbers, will be Bisons => MMRCA.Wrong again. LCA is supposed to replace mig21 and BISONs not MRCA.
Well i dont have an answer to that, but i want to comment something on the same topic. The rumors that the order of MMRCA would be increased, plus oredring more MKIs, is giving me a bad feeling that the IAF lacks trust in LCA for now. I really hope that its not the case.
ps- guys please don't get all pissed of about my post. I am not at all critical of Tejas, but its just a thought that came to mind.
Sukhoi-30MKI Biography, Sukhoi-30MKI Bio
Su-30MKI: Facts, Discussion Forum, and Encyclopedia Article
these all states that IAF is looking to have around 280 by 2015, and if this 42 is true, it will take us beyond 300