Skull and Bones
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 18,601
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Just bomb the dams.
And then flood the downstream areas. I guess one flood was not enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just bomb the dams.
Give a link about the 90 days notice. The Jan27 news has nothing about a notice.While Pakistan State and Military Estate attacking Pakistani awam, India has served Pakistan 90 day notice to talk about modifying Indus Water Treaty
"An Indian government source said on Friday New Delhi had served Pakistan a notice to modify the treaty and wanted to meet to start resolving the long-running dispute within 90 days."
It is opportunate time for India to dictate its terms on Indus Water, Kashmir, Jammu, Laddakh, Siachen Glacier, and Trade.
And thats not it. India has constructed/under construction several strategic level tunnels throughout J&K to link with rest of India. Of course, all of that to move logistics at pace during war with Pakistan.
All this is going on, while Lord Clive's Military Inc Army attacking Pakistani Awam to perpetuate its economic and political interests.
As admins are quick to delete threads that directly or indirectly blame military establishment citing invalid source, for the state of malaise in Pakistan, here is the Reuters link and full article about Indus Water Treaty.
IT IS A MATTER OF DEATH AND DEATH FOR PAKISTAN.
Is there anyone to defend Pakistan?
India wants to keep third parties out of water treaty with Pakistan - sources
India has asked Pakistan to change a decades-old water-sharing agreement by barring third parties from intervening in disputes, an Indian government source said, a suggestion likely to rile Islamabad.www.reuters.com
India wants to keep third parties out of water treaty with Pakistan - sources
By Krishn Kaushik
NEW DELHI, Jan 27 ( Reuters) - India has asked Pakistan to change a decades-old water-sharing agreement by barring third parties from intervening in disputes, an Indian government source said, a suggestion likely to rile Islamabad.
The nuclear-armed neighbours and foes have been arguing over hydroelectric projects on the shared Indus river and its tributaries for many years - a dispute exacerbated by their standoff over disputed Kashmir.
Pakistan is concerned that India's planned hydropower dams will cut flows on the river, which feeds 80% of its irrigated agriculture. Over the years it has asked for a neutral expert and then an arbitration court to intervene.
India has accused Pakistan of dragging out the complaints process, and says the construction of its Kishanganga and Ratle Hydro Electric projects is allowed by the six-decade-old Indus Water Treaty.
Why is it that Pakistan has never been able to show a violation of the IWT by India?
Pleas see the above.
IWT has always been unfair to east punjab, the rulers in delhi need to correct this unfair magnanimity showered on the other punjab at the cost of farmers here.
Put in civilian clothing on them and fireUniform arms don't have strength...
Bet you $500 nothing will happenOn the contrary, a real or perceived deprivation of water to 220+ million people would be the war-cry to galvanize and unite Pakistanis!!
PS. I remember a video clip in which the Indian PM Manmohan Singh in sometimes in the 2000s era to a Pakistani journalist. He said something like 'You go back to Pakistan and tell them India is not cutting and will never cut Pakistan's water supplies'. I think he sounded sincere. Could the Modi govt fall to such lows of restricting Pakistan's water supplies?? Hard to say at this point. But, while Pakistanis might have not too much protested about the 'run of the river' damns built by India, any re-interpretation of the Indus Water Treaty to reduce Pakistan's water supply WILL be catastrophic for the region; Pakistan is one and the only country in South Asia which can destroy India even in a conventional war.
Lack of understanding of law, poor choice of legal team and most importantly - poor and mostly delayed or illtimed lawsuits.Why is it that Pakistan has never been able to show a violation of the IWT by India?
Pleas see the above.
Details matter.I don't know the technical aspects but I think perhaps the 'run of the river' dams to generate powers upstream wouldn't endanger Pakistan's water supplies in quantity.
But what I do know is that the moment Pakistanis, who are in 220 million in numbers, sense that water supplies to Pakistan would be restricted by India--if India would be foolish and cruel enough to do such an act--then that moment would be a catastrophe for the Subcontinent.
No, don't go that route! You agreed to that and so should stick to the agreement in letter and spirit. There are people in Pakistan's Punjab who still accuse Ayub Khan of giving away too much of Pakistan's waters to India via the Indus Water Treaty.
Your rationale is a doomsday's rationale: Every thief or invader or megalomaniac starts wars with arguments like your's!!!
The Indus Water Treaty, just like the partition of Punjab, was very unfair to the Sikhs. Just like the Sikhs were denied their historical cities of Lahore, Gujranwala and Multan, they were also denied their fair share of the river waters. It is good that the Modi government is taking steps to correct this historical injustice.
You dont get it.. kashmir itself will be the first to get flooded prior to anything else. The particular area in flooded kashmir will be Impossible to hold for an occupational force..And then flood the downstream areas. I guess one flood was not enough.
Historical cities? Lahore alone has served as the capital of more Muslim empires then the one time it served as the capital for their small kingdom that didn’t even manage to rule all of Punjab.The Indus Water Treaty, just like the partition of Punjab, was very unfair to the Sikhs. Just like the Sikhs were denied their historical cities of Lahore, Gujranwala and Multan, they were also denied their fair share of the river waters. It is good that the Modi government is taking steps to correct this historical injustice.
You should look at the map - vast majority of Indus valley is in Pakistan, that's why most of the Indus water should logically be Pakistan'sSome neutral party like the Swiss should review it. By the way, why is the division not 50-50?
BC, Randi Bhushan toh hum yaha churan bech rahein theThe Indus Water Treaty, just like the partition of Punjab, was very unfair to the Sikhs. Just like the Sikhs were denied their historical cities of Lahore, Gujranwala and Multan, they were also denied their fair share of the river waters. It is good that the Modi government is taking steps to correct this historical injustice.
not sure of the details, but if that is the caseIWT has always been unfair to east punjab, the rulers in delhi need to correct this unfair magnanimity showered on the other punjab at the cost of farmers here.