Yeh hai chhittar jo hamarey munh pe maar me gaye hain.Duniya walo dekho hamen 120 se mar pari ha. hamare pas saboot ha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeh hai chhittar jo hamarey munh pe maar me gaye hain.Duniya walo dekho hamen 120 se mar pari ha. hamare pas saboot ha
Best part is :
After getting the shock and surprise of their life, the Indians came up with an absurd excuse by waving to the media a wreckage piece of said to be from an AIM-120C AMRAAM Missile with claims that it was fired from a PAF F-16. Since Pakistani authorities said that no F-16s wetre used in the operation, so in hindsight the Indians were crying to the Americans that your weapons in Pakistani hands are killing us. Although it's not difficult to stencil the markings on any piece of wreckage and the serial number leads it to a batch supplied to Taiwan with whom Pakistan has no diplomatic relations, none the less, PAF does have these missiles in it's armoury. It's also ironic that a weapon travelling over Mach-3 which disintegrates upon impact still had such a part intact and that too where all the details are apparent.
However, lets assume this is indeed a piece from an AMRAAM fired by a PAF F-16 at an Indian target, we know one Indian MiG-21 went down inside Pakistan so this piece couldn't have been from that and was recovered from Indian side of LOC, which can only mean that the victim of the said missile also went down on the Indian side. Although there are several eyewitnesses who claim to have seen at least two aircraft going down, one on each side of the LOC, Indian authorities, however, haphazardly have so far admitted to losing just one MiG-21 which they said went down in Pakistan. So the question remains, where did the Indians recovered the wreckage of the missile. It's obviously an air to air weapon so hitting some ground target with it is out of question. Which only leaves the possibility that whatever this missile struck, it went down on the Indian side. Now was that the helicopter which same day crashed some where in IOK or was it something more prized which the Indians feel too embarrassed to disclose.
So in essence by waving this piece of missile wreckage, the Indians have thus shot themselves in the foot by revealing a second loss....what it was is anyone's guess.
@Oscar @Hodor @Bilal Khan 777 @Irfan Baloch @Horus
Ok... 2 planes dropping in teh video..same time same place...... ISPR claims 2 pilots held.... then ISPR U turn..only 1 pilot captured and 1 image released.... why if both fell on the same place then release only 1 ?? why ?? and whats the need of anothe statement issue of 1 pillt to rectify ?? Lets assume its Indian pilot.. then you really think they are fools that once they claim 2 pilots then India will claim only 1 and rejoice when 1 pilot is dead (same log as your when your force were rejoicing). Also..I am not the who is satisfied with any proof.. but f16 missile is just suuplementary to what ISPR showed us..the Uturn.... C'mon dude... I am asking the reason for U turn... of ISPR..give me a valid reason.
I think your missed the whole speech of mine about whataboutery, I'll refrain from repeating everything said in my last post again.
Neither I trust anyone blindly nor I dance to them
There have been plenty of articles in past few days that reject IAF strikes of balakot and instead call it to be a botched opertsion
Turn off your TV. And start reading.
Here is a good start for you
Once you are done ask me for more reality checks.
kiya nonsense likh rahay ho bahi. If Pakistan withholds personnel and kills him, it will be a political defeat. DGISPR said one captured two in the area. Then he said one captured one in CMH. At that time it was Abhi who was captured. Turns out it was also Abhi in the CMH. Janab in trying to be the first, DGISPR made mistakes. You should also know Pakistanis were angry with his payload comment which made no sense. We were debating what kind of payload. Majority thought that perhaps the pilots had jettisoned their fuel tanks. Don't be fooled, Pakistan made mistakes in reporting not maliciously but unintentionally. I hate to say that VCheng is right we need to move on. Later down the road who did what will emerge on its own.
F-16 or JF-17Was F16 used or not?
https://m.businesstoday.in/lite/sto...t-of-their-fighter-jet-crashing/1/322823.html
You surely can’t have it both ways
again .... illl say ... it might be search party from IA to corss border ... and save pilot .... why dont you ask IAF about the lost su30 pilots ....???? your media did say you lost 1 su30mki
I like the indian pilot
look at his eyes seems enjoying and relax . he seems to become personality over an hour even he loss the air combatI like the indian pilot
he is way better than the fake chest thumping butcher of Gujrat
New Recruit
After getting the shock and surprise of their life, the Indians came up with an absurd excuse by waving to the media a wreckage piece of said to be from an AIM-120C AMRAAM Missile with claims that it was fired from a PAF F-16. Since Pakistani authorities said that no F-16s wetre used in the operation, so in hindsight the Indians were crying to the Americans that your weapons in Pakistani hands are killing us. Although it's not difficult to stencil the markings on any piece of wreckage and the serial number leads it to a batch supplied to Taiwan with whom Pakistan has no diplomatic relations, none the less, PAF does have these missiles in it's armoury. It's also ironic that a weapon travelling over Mach-3 which disintegrates upon impact still had such a part intact and that too where all the details are apparent.
However, lets assume this is indeed a piece from an AMRAAM fired by a PAF F-16 at an Indian target, we know one Indian MiG-21 went down inside Pakistan so this piece couldn't have been from that and was recovered from Indian side of LOC, which can only mean that the victim of the said missile also went down on the Indian side. Although there are several eyewitnesses who claim to have seen at least two aircraft going down, one on each side of the LOC, Indian authorities, however, haphazardly have so far admitted to losing just one MiG-21 which they said went down in Pakistan. So the question remains, where did the Indians recovered the wreckage of the missile. It's obviously an air to air weapon so hitting some ground target with it is out of question. Which only leaves the possibility that whatever this missile struck, it went down on the Indian side. Now was that the helicopter which same day crashed some where in IOK or was it something more prized which the Indians feel too embarrassed to disclose.
So in essence by waving this piece of missile wreckage, the Indians have thus shot themselves in the foot by revealing a second loss....what it was is anyone's guess.
@Oscar @Hodor @Bilal Khan 777 @Irfan Baloch @Horus
Was F16 used or not?
https://m.businesstoday.in/lite/sto...t-of-their-fighter-jet-crashing/1/322823.html
You surely can’t have it both ways
Ok for the sake of this argument I complete ignore whwtever my media or my govt is saying for a moment. Lets come to what your Govt is saying...your ISPR released a video and your Govt reported of capturing tow pilots..1 in hospital and one 1 custody. you release the pic of one pilot...Now where is the second one ? Let me tell you..you Giovt is too embarassed to release the truth and hence teh U turn after they realised who it actually was. Stop being a blind follower.
you can take a horse to the water but you can't make it drink. My issue here remains that I do not offend you. If I had some clarification I would present it. My claims are based on the Highest Common Factor. I do not need to participate in jingoism. Proving you wrong does not benefit me nor does it feed me. Bye bye.That's not an excuse for not answering a valid question which was the initial point of mine.
Dude. a simple introspection will answer that. Not that I expect that from you. But instead of trying to prove me things....start asking question to your ISPR. That article needs me to sign up... so not reading that... you can post a screenshot of the article ...will give it a read.
your last part first...I think i agree with that so yes time will reveal more. Other part I think I have the right to refuse your claim since ISPR is your official platform. SO no sir... not a valid excuse.