What's new

India says drops anti-piracy charges against Italian marines

Sugarcane

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
21,105
Reaction score
29
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
r


(Reuters) - India has dropped a plan to prosecute two Italian marines accused of killing two Indian fishermen under a tough anti-piracy law, a government lawyer said on Monday, offering a chance to end a diplomatic row between the two countries.

Italy had strongly opposed India invoking the law, arguing that it would amount to treating the men as "terrorists" and last week it recalled its ambassador to New Delhi in protest against the delay in the two-year-old case.

The sailors, part of a military security team protecting a privately-owned cargo ship, say they mistook the fishermen for pirates and fired warning shots into the water during the incident in February 2012, off the coast of Kerala state.

Indian attorney general Ghoolam Vahanvati told the Supreme Court on Monday that the prosecution did not intend to proceed against Massimiliano Latorre and Salvatore Girone under the anti-piracy section of the Suppression of Unlawful Acts. He gave no reason.

"We want to delete the anti-piracy clause," he said. The men can still be tried under India's criminal laws, but the punishment there in case of a conviction is ordinarily less stringent than under the piracy law.

The government had originally sought to prosecute the marines under the piracy law partly because the incident occurred outside the geographical area covered by the country's criminal code.

It said, however, that the sailors would not face the death penalty, which the anti-piracy law usually carries, because it has not permitted the investigation agency handling the case to invoke that particular clause in the legislation.

However, it was not clear whether a court would have had to obey this selective block.

The dispute over the marines has provoked a public as well as a political outcry in both countries. In India, supporters of harsh penalties for the men have marched on the streets.

The Supreme Court on Monday said it would rule on whether India's National Investigation Agency which handles cases relating to national security should investigate the fishermen's deaths at its next hearing. It gave no date for the next session.

The top court ruled over a year ago that a trial would take place in India, but charges have not yet been filed. Defense lawyers for Italy and the marines maintain that the incident happened beyond India's jurisdiction.

The delays in filing charges, not unusual in India's notoriously slow legal system, spurred Italy to approach the apex court last month demanding a nod for the marines to return home and a block on any use of the anti-piracy law.

The two men deny killing anyone or aiming directly at the fishing boat. They are on bail but cannot leave India.

(Reporting by Suchitra Mohanty; Writing by Sanjeev Miglani; Editing by Ron Popeski)

India says drops anti-piracy charges against Italian marines| Reuters
 
Thats weird , new paper article of today says they will charged as per Anti piracy law
 
Lets be hones , they were trigger happy and it had nothing to do with intended murder. they will still be charged with culpable murder , murder and a few other charges . they wont get the death penalty but they will get life.
 
Lets be hones , they were trigger happy and it had nothing to do with intended murder. they will still be charged with culpable murder , murder and a few other charges . they wont get the death penalty but they will get life.

Is life 18 years ?
 
Do you guys think the government will try to wrap this up before election, or drag it out so the fallout happens after election?
 
The two men deny killing anyone or aiming directly at the fishing boat.

So they didn't "aim" at the boat, yet successfully killed them?

What kind of guns do they think they are using? Some kind of futuristic guided bullets that automatically seek human targets?
 
Lets be hones , they were trigger happy and it had nothing to do with intended murder. they will still be charged with culpable murder , murder and a few other charges . they wont get the death penalty but they will get life.

I can't understand why we even thought of slapping anti-piracy charges on them- they clearly weren't involved in piracy and there were no pre-mediation for murder. Something seriously wrong with their engagement protocol. Give them 10-15 years and let them go I guess.

So they didn't "aim" at the boat, yet successfully killed them?

What kind of guns do they think they are using? Some kind of futuristic guided bullets that automatically seek human targets?

They did aim, but there is no evidence of them being motivated by malicious intent.
 
Is life 18 years ?
Well it depends as in some stated it means 14 yrs. but some courts do mention life with no chance of release. i know of some guys who were in for murder and had already completed 20+ yrs in prison.
 
Drop of this charge means they will not be treated as 'terrorists' and won't get capital punishment rather now they will be charged with normal murder which carries 10 years imprisonment.
 
I can't understand why we even thought of slapping anti-piracy charges on them- they clearly weren't involved in piracy and there were no pre-mediation for murder. Something seriously wrong with their engagement protocol. Give them 10-15 years and let them go I guess.



They did aim, but there is no evidence of them being motivated by malicious intent.
Actually that SNAFU was courtesy of our former home sec . :) i guess he got over enthusiastic.
 
Is life 18 years ?

Well it depends as in some stated it means 14 yrs. but some courts do mention life with no chance of release. i know of some guys who were in for murder and had already completed 20+ yrs in prison.

Life imprisonment implies a jail term for the convict’s entire life, the Supreme Court has held, clearing a misconception on this sentence.

The apex court also said that its Constitution bench’s landmark judgement of 1980 on criterion for imposing death penalty needs a “fresh look” as there has been “no uniformity” in following its principles on what constitutes “the rarest of rare” cases.

“It appears to us there is a misconception that a prisoner serving a life sentence has an indefeasible right to be released on completion of either fourteen years or twenty years imprisonment. The prisoner has no such right.

“A convict undergoing life imprisonment is expected to remain in custody till the end of his life, subject to any remission granted by the appropriate government,” a bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Madan B. Lokur said.

The bench, however, clarified that under remission the appropriate government cannot reduce the period of sentence less than 14 years for a life convict.

“In the case of a convict undergoing life imprisonment, he will be in custody for an indeterminate period. Therefore, remissions earned by or awarded to such a life convict are only notional. In his case, to reduce the period of incarceration, a specific order under Section 432 of the CrPC will have to be passed by the appropriate government. However, the reduced period cannot be less than 14 years as per Section 433-A of the CrPC,” the apex court said.

The apex court order also seeks to put an end to the practice of en-masse release of the convicts by various governments on “festive” occasions and said each release requires a case-by-case basis scrutiny.


Life imprisonment means jail term for entire life: SC - The Hindu
 
Back
Top Bottom