What's new

India’s secret ICBM ambitions

Whatever pleases the Indian ego.

The Chinese know they can decimate the whole of India with nukes launched from the CJ-10 CJ-20 platform, no need to even use ballistic missiles.

Thats the truth,may be high IQ chinese cannot comprehend it.
 
.
Whatever pleases the Indian ego.

The Chinese know they can decimate the whole of India with nukes launched from the CJ-10 CJ-20 platform, no need to even use ballistic missiles.

Wow! delivery of nukes by Cruise missile :laughcry: Chinese military science too now?
 
.
India hosted the commonwealth games in 2010, a newly built footbridge collapsed before a single person stepped on it, the roof of the weightlifting venue collapsed, the athletes village were ****** (human excrements on the ground/bed) and hundreds of "volunteers" went AWOL after they received their free volunteer clothing.

Commonwealth games isn't returning to India for the foreseeable future and for good reasons. A reality check for India really, imagine blackouts during the olympics.

And they actually bid to host the Olympics. :woot:
 
. .
India hosted the commonwealth games in 2010, a newly built footbridge collapsed before a single person stepped on it, the roof of the weightlifting venue collapsed, the athletes village were ****** (human excrements on the ground/bed) and hundreds of "volunteers" went AWOL after they received their free volunteer clothing.

Commonwealth games isn't returning to India for the foreseeable future and for good reasons. A reality check for India really, imagine blackouts during the olympics.

Yeah right..black outs...We doesnt have them,but your ally in South Asia have it...:omghaha:

And keep deluding yourself.

Now this what the responses of international media,after the games.

"But once the games started on October 3, all the venues were cleaned up and ready. Athletes praised the facilities at the venues and at the village, and only a handful of the more than 6,000 players and officials were reported sick during the games, belying fears of contaminated water and 'Delhi belly.'"

Commonwealth Games 2010: India's closing ceremony is a spectacular send-off | Mail Online

"The latest headlines are: Delhi's Commonwealth showing a winner, after all (Vancouver Sun) and CWG 2010: India has every right to be proud after torrid build-up (Daily Telegraph), Games 2010 finish with India triumphant (Guardian) and Delhi bellyachers the losers as Games overcome hurdles in strong finish (Sydney Morning Herald).*

Sydney Morning Herald even carried an online poll; the question being, Would you rate the Delhi Games a success? 81% said yes. The Toronto Star says that for the host nation "the greatest legacy of the Games" is "not the medal total, but the potential launching of a sports culture in India."*
"

CWG village better than Beijing: England Chef de Mission - TOI Mobile | The Times of India Mobile Site

India hosted the commonwealth games in 2010, a newly built footbridge collapsed before a single person stepped on it, the roof of the weightlifting venue collapsed, the athletes village were ****** (human excrements on the ground/bed) and hundreds of "volunteers" went AWOL after they received their free volunteer clothing.

Commonwealth games isn't returning to India for the foreseeable future and for good reasons. A reality check for India really, imagine blackouts during the olympics.

Yeah right..black outs...We doesnt have them,but your ally in South Asia have it...:omghaha:

And keep deluding yourself.

Now this what the responses of international media,after the games.

"But once the games started on October 3, all the venues were cleaned up and ready. Athletes praised the facilities at the venues and at the village, and only a handful of the more than 6,000 players and officials were reported sick during the games, belying fears of contaminated water and 'Delhi belly.'"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...as-closing-ceremony-spectacular-send-off.html

"The latest headlines are: Delhi's Commonwealth showing a winner, after all (Vancouver Sun) and CWG 2010: India has every right to be proud after torrid build-up (Daily Telegraph), Games 2010 finish with India triumphant (Guardian) and Delhi bellyachers the losers as Games overcome hurdles in strong finish (Sydney Morning Herald).*

Sydney Morning Herald even carried an online poll; the question being, Would you rate the Delhi Games a success? 81% said yes. The Toronto Star says that for the host nation "the greatest legacy of the Games" is "not the medal total, but the potential launching of a sports culture in India."*
"

http://m.timesofindia.com/sports/ne...gland-Chef-de-Mission/articleshow/6567832.cms
 
. . . .
The other ones were not ICBMs, only IRBMs and MRBMs. An ICBM is a BM with range greater than 8000 kms.



Same goes for you. You haven't yet developed an ICBM, despite all these years and money for BMs. India developed lots of BMs in many range classes, it has not yet tried to develop an ICBM with range > 8000 kms. It is doing so only now, a natural progression after making SRBMs and MRBMs and IRBMs.

BTW do you even know what the 'IC' in ICBM stands for? If you do, then can you think of any earthly reason why India would need an ICBM against Pakistan, which not only resides in the same continent, but is actually and literally right next to India?

So what is really lousy? Your neighbor, or your brain?

ICBM is a missile having 5500+ KM range.
 
.
India AGNI series weighs too much for so little payload capacity, meaning it will never be actively road mobile, India's civilian to military conversion technology of ballistic missiles technology means they are too heavy and underpowered (conventional countries develop military technology then apply them to civilian use).

A 50 tonne AGNI-V can only deliver a max of 1.5 tonne payload 5000 km, in comparison a 40 tonne DF-41 can deliver a similar payload 12,000 - 14,000 km.

India is where China was in the late 60s/early 70s with the DF-3A, this is speaking from the power to weight ratio and payload delivery capabilities.

More concerning would be whether India has a working warhead to go with their new missile, with India's poor record of nuclear tests (1998's fizzle), when the unthinkable time comes and India need to use their missile, do they really dare putting a live warhead on it (it may very well burn and explode up on re-entry).

Show me a source which tells DF 41 has payload of 1,500 KG

I am yet to see such source.
 
.
That is the question by Mr Weinner. India has no miniaturization capability to make warhead small enough for the missiles India is developing. He was wondering why a country would build the missile but has no warheads for the missiles. Your question is the same question he has? Is puzzling that a country would do such a thing, isn't it. If its not for the fact of his article. I would say that someone is making fun of Indian scientists. But now, its likely that India has all the missiles but not the warheads for them.

The problem is USA delivered the missiles and warhead separately to India and the missiles arrived first and now India is waiting for the warheads to arrive so that Indians can finally claim that they have successfully built their own "indigenous ICBMs after doing some paint job" . :taz:
 
.
The problem is China delivered the missiles and warhead separately to PAkistan and the missiles arrived first and now Pakistan is waiting for the warheads to arrive so that Pakistanis can finally claim that they have successfully built their own "indigenous ICBMs after doing some paint job" . :taz:

Fixed it for ya.
 
.
ICBM is a missile having 5500+ KM range.

There is no hard definition for what is an ICBM. By today's standards, 5500 kms is not really considered ICBM. Check out the list of ICBMs in service worldwide, and see if any of them have a range less than 10k kms. No country calls their 5K km ranged missile an ICBM. That is why the title of the thread stresses the word 'real'.
 
.
There is no hard definition for what is an ICBM. By today's standards, 5500 kms is not really considered ICBM. Check out the list of ICBMs in service worldwide, and see if any of them have a range less than 10k kms. No country calls their 5K km ranged missile an ICBM. That is why the title of the thread stresses the word 'real'.

Yup. Unlike all the other Indian Trolls, You are the only HONEST Indian user here !
 
.
The problem is USA delivered the missiles and warhead separately to India and the missiles arrived first and now India is waiting for the warheads to arrive so that Indians can finally claim that they have successfully built their own "indigenous ICBMs after doing some paint job" . :taz:

So now it's USA? Earlier on this very thread your countrymen (not Malaysians, as you were pretending to be) were claiming that it is all made in Russia and painted in India. Be consistent, will you?

Or maybe India has the unique distinction of American missiles with Russian seekers and Chinese warheads painted in India.

Damn, jealous trolls will cook up anything to satisfy themselves. Including fake nationalities for themselves.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom