India rejects China's offer, says talks with Pakistan only possible in bilateral framework

[IceCold]

What about war? Is war possible out of the bilateral framework?

 

[Canuck786]

Do you know what the Silguri corridor is ?

Oh Lets see! If the whole of India is CHICKEN then Silguri Corridor would be the CHICKEN`S NECK?

 

[shahbaz baig]

Your opinion doesn't count. After seeing how your countries truly behave and act......I wouldn't pee in an cup if you were thirsty.

ok president of U.S
go and update your self then quote to me

Do you know what the Silguri corridor is ?

the neck of india

 

[Lord Of Gondor]

from wiki (does any Indian member have official source of the Simla agreement so I can go over the content?)

http://mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?19005/Simla+Agreement+July+2+1972

 

[el nino]

Can India mediate between Baluchistan and the pak govt .
The Baluchistan people want their freedom from tyranny

 

[third eye]

Actually, I was suggesting the same with a Chinese nitro-booster

Today, even this does not suit us.

Thats exactly what China wants to legitimize the route -in for the CPEC which is through disputed territory. Even the ceding of areas by Pak to China is illegal & disputed.China after 70 years has not given up its claim on AP , why should India give up its claim on Occupied Kashmir & GB ?

A lot of homework & back channel activities need to be done . Moreover , once again involving a 3rd party is a non starter , it would undo our stand for decades.

 

[shahbaz baig]

i have been watching Indian comments since yesterday. and mostly of them emphasized on Shimla Agreement.
but they forgot that this is india who always violate the Shimla Agreement by ignoring every humble request of Pakistan to resolve the kashmir issue as written in agreement that both countries have to negotiate without any interfering of 3rd party, so India should not have denied Pakistan request since long time to resolve the issue according to agreement.. Indian reached peak hypocrisy yet...
so in return 3rd party have to interfere.

 

[Photon]

What about war? Is war possible out of the bilateral framework?

Yes, they are called world wars.
With advent of nuclear weapons, world decided not to get bogged down in another one, since it would mean, end to human existence.

 

[wiseone2]

why would china get involved in india-pakistan dispute is beyond me ?

 

[IceCold]

Yes, they are called world wars.
With advent of nuclear weapons, world decided not to get bogged down in another one, since it would mean, end to human existence.

No it wont not in regional context. Besides no white man is going to lay his/her life for browns. China however is a different story altogether.

 

[Photon]

No it wont not in regional context. Besides no white man is going to lay his/her life for browns. China however is a different story altogether.

Why, how many Chinese have laid their life for brown men?

And on the other hand white men have been laying down their lives for brown men, since first Gulf war and still are.

 

[ChennaiDude]

i have been watching Indian comments since tomorrow. and mostly of them emphasized on Shimla Agreement.
but they forgot that this is india who always violate the Shimla Agreement by ignoring every humble request of Pakistan to resolve the kashmir issue as written in agreement that both countries have to negotiate without any interfering of 3rd party, so India should not have denied Pakistan request since long time to resolve the issue according to agreement.. Indian reached peak hypocrisy yet...
so in return 3rd party have to interfere.

I am impressed..can you summarize the Indian comments from Tomorrow...I would like to have a head start!

 

[shahbaz baig]

I am impressed..can you summarize the Indian comments from Tomorrow...I would like to head a head start!

i am sorry that you are dumb to read the previous comments.. i have sympathy for you..

 

[OnlyTheTruth]

Have our bright Pakistani friends on PDF ever given a thought on why Norway was involved in the mediation during the Sri Lankan-LTTE war. Mediator in such disputes can't be a stakeholder. In any case,mediation by a third country is totally outside the scope. One mustn't pay heed to these CCP spokespersons and 'scholars'.

 

[ChennaiDude]

i am sorry that you are dumb to read the previous comments.. i have sympathy for you..

No dont be sorry!..please..I am a dumb guy....I am actually responding back to you!..So hopefully you will understand what I am trying to say Yesterday!