India reiterates Arunachal is ours.

[Ajaxpaul]

it does not matter whether arunchalist want or not. we can recivilize this region.

It matters because what you are talking is Invasion. I doubt whether your leaders are as lunatic as you are.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

I think the Indian Armed forces know more than the fanboys on this forum...

 

[navtrek]

The British claimed Hong Kong was theirs. In 1997, the British were sent packing.

Portugal claimed Macau was theirs. In 1999, Portugal was sent packing.

No one cares what India claims. When the CCP decides time is up, Indian colonialists in South Tibet will be sent packing.

I your dreams!. i don't think u know how Indians feel abt the issue. You cant take Arunachal Pradesh by force if u try u will fail.

 

[3Idiots]

it does not matter whether arunchalist want or not. we can recivilize this region.

China itself needs to be re-civilised.

Just like Germany has been civilised, post-Hitler.

Japan has become peaceful.

Remember, Beijing is organizing itself for it's 1st May, 1945.

And shanghai for it's 6th Aug, 1945.

 

[NirmalKrish]

China is building up its airfields for the eventuality of retaking South Tibet from Indian colonialists.

China has 10 airfields surrounding South Tibet for the war of liberation.

J-10 Vigorous Dragons have been deployed to Tibet (see picture below).

China's Military Spending to Double by 2015 - Report - China Real Time Report - WSJ

"China’s Military Spending to Double by 2015 – Report
by Jeremy Page
February 14, 2012, 3:14 PM HKT

Chinese Air Force J-10 fighter jets take off during training in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet. (Associated Press)

China’s defense budget will double by 2015, making it more than the rest of the Asia Pacific region’s combined, according to a report from IHS Jane’s, a global think tank specializing in security issues.

Beijing’s military spending will reach $238.2 billion in 2015, compared with $232.5 billion for rest of the region, according to the report. That would also be almost four times the expected defense budget of Japan, the next biggest in the region, in 2015, the report said.

The new report was released as China’s Vice President, Xi Jinping, arrived in Washington at the start of a four-day visit to the U.S. that is seen as a prelude to his expected promotion to Communist Party chief in a once-a-decade leadership change in the fall.

Mr Xi, who is also Vice Chairman of the Party’s Central Military Commission, is due to visit the Pentagon on Tuesday after meeting his counterpart, Joe Biden, and Presdent Obama at the White House earlier in the day.

Ahead of the visit, he and other Chinese officials had expressed concern about the U.S. decision to refocus its military strategy on Asia last year, and complained of a “trust deficit” between Beijing and Washington.

China says that its military spending does not pose a threat to any other country, and has repeatedly pointed out that it still represents a tiny fraction of U.S. defense spending. But the new research highlights what U.S. officials are worried about: That China is rapidly increasing its military spending without being sufficiently transparent about its strategic intentions in the region.

Many of China’s neighbors have been alarmed in the last year or two by what they see as Beijing’s more assertive stance on territorial issues, especially over the South China Sea.

China says its defense budget for 2011 increased by 12.7 percent to about $91.5 billion, but many defense experts believe its real military spending is much higher.

IHS Jane’s put the figure for 2011 at $119.8 billion, and predicted it would increase by an average of 18.75 percent annually until 2015.

“China’s investment will race ahead at an eye watering 18.75 percent, leaving Japan and India far behind,” said Paul Burton, senior principal analyst of IHS Jane’s Defence Budgets.

He added that Taiwan’s defense spending was expected to have overtaken Singapore’s by 2015, while Vietnam and Indonesia were also forecast to increase military expenditure at a rate that exceeds GDP growth.

Rajiv Biswas, chief Asia Pacific economist for IHS Global Insight, was quoted saying: “Beijing has been able to devote an increasingly large portion of its overall budget towards defence and has been steadily building up its military capabilities for more than two decades.”

He continued: “This will continue unless there is an economic catastrophe. Conversely Japan and India may have to hold back due to significant economic challenges.”

Responding to the report, the Global Times, a nationalist tabloid published by the Communist Party mouthpiece People’s Daily, did not dispute IHS Jane’s projections but warned against Western powers “with an axe to grind” using China’s military budget to promote the idea of a China threat.

The aim of China’s defense modernization “is safeguard national unity and security,” the paper said (in Chinese). Adhering to the policy of coordinated development of national defense and the economy, investment in national defense has always occurred on a moderate and reasonable scale.”

AIRSHOW-Asia's biggest arms, aerospace event begins under China shadow | Reuters

"* China defence spending to hit $238 billion by 2015

* Japan spending constrained by Fukushima disaster
...
IHS Jane's said in a report that while all major Asian nations are forecast to increase spending on defence, China's military budget will soar to $238.20 billion by 2015 from $119.80 billion last year, growing about 18.75 percent per annum.

That number will exceed spending by all other nations in the region combined, but compares with a base U.S. defence budget of $525.40 billion for 2013.

In Asia, Japan and India follow China in defence spending, but both may be constrained in coming years while China is likely to steam ahead, underpinned by strong economic growth, analysts said.

"Japan's government debt and the investment needed after Fukushima will impact defence spend. We will increasingly see budget channeled towards key programmes and equipment," said Rajiv Biswas, chief economist in the Asia-Pacific for IHS Global Insight.

"India's government debt and fiscal deficit is very high as a share of GDP, and the rupee depreciated significantly in 2011, all of which will limit India's defence ambitions."

Nevertheless, Japan's defence budget is forecast to rise to $66.60 billion by 2015 from $60.30 billion last year. India's military expenditure is likely to be $44.90 billion in 2015 from $35.40 billion in 2011."

I have to agree with the Pakistani members on this one it does not matter if you spend $600 billion on your defence, if war breaks out its not going to be conventional and it will be nuclear and we bomb each other and ruin our lands into a toxic dump and both economird are doomed and sent back to the stone age. so like we said you can spend all the money you want and eat grass for all we care but its not going to intimidate us.

 

[PEACEMAKER2010]

 

[3Idiots]

I said Chinese. I don't care what propaganda BBC writes.

Show me People's Daily, China Daily, Xinhua, or Global Times.

Internet blogs are more authentic than the chinese sh1ts your just mentioned.

 

[Harry Potter]

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

I think the Indian Armed forces know more than the fanboys on this forum.

You should look for some more recent links:
Indian Navy tackles Chinese maritime challenge in the Indian Ocean : South News - India Today

To a query if Chinese acquisitions were a cause of worry for India, Kukreja claimed, "Chinese technology is not sound compared to India's."

"Of whatever I have seen in the market ... Chinese toys break within two months ... a DVD and a camera lasts for one month ... Whatever we are acquiring and developing is far better than the Chinese ...," Kukreja said.

Air Marshal dismisses US report on India-China "limited" war : Neighbours News - India Today


Indian Army preparing for limited conflict with China: US intel chief - The Times of India

 

[Martian2]

I your dreams!. i don't think u know how Indians feel abt the issue. You cant take Arunachal Pradesh by force if u try u will fail.

China claims Sikkim and South Tibet. India claims Sikkim and South Tibet.

War will decide the victor and owner of Sikkim and South Tibet.

The British and Portuguese decided not to challenge Chinese sovereignty over Hong Kong and Macau. However, I have a feeling Indians need to feel the power of Chinese cannons to relinquish their colonialism over Sikkim and South Tibet.

 

[Tshering22]

No one cares what India claims. When the CCP decides time is up, Indian colonialists in South Tibet will be sent packing.

pathetic chinese. Can't differ between Native and European..

There's your answer by an Arunachali. Now run back to CCP and tell them the message.

 

[janon]

I said Chinese. I don't care what propaganda BBC writes.

Show me People's Daily, China Daily, Xinhua, or Global Times.

That explains why you believe in alternate histories, like your earlier claims that the british were sent packing when they tried to claim hong kong.

Sometimes you have to look beyond party mouthpieces, to know whats going on in the real world.

Party mouthpieces will make it sound like all that happened was because of the glories of the party and military. Idiotic citizens will go around thinking that they snatched territories, when the reality is that the occupiers left after their intended stay.

 

[NirmalKrish]

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

I think the Indian Armed forces know more than the fanboys on this forum...

that would make you the biggest one, have a look at yourself in the mirror. the premium troll is back

 

[Tshering22]

China claims Sikkim and South Tibet. India claims Sikkim and South Tibet.

War will decide the victor and owner of Sikkim and South Tibet.

But you didn't ask us what we want?

Here's your answer: We are Indians and proud to be so.

True war will decide the factor.. but not about Arunachal or us; but the fate of Tibet.

You're making the classic mistake most ambitious nations around the world historically have made; confusing non-violence with weakness.

If you continue your aggression, you will meet your downfall.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

I think the Indian Armed forces know more than the fanboys on this forum...

You must have posted this link atleast 100 times on this forum . and i shall give the same reply which we always give .

come and take it

Your post is a clear example of chinese hegemony . You dont care about what Arunachalis want and care about . You will instead try to intimidate people into giving up their territory .

No wonder Chinese have started hating Indians because we dont budge under your pressure unlike the Tajiks and other countries around you . You hate the fact that a smaller and poorer country can show your intimidation tactics the middle finger .

As i said if you want Arunachal and believe it should be easy to take please do give it a shot .

 

[itaskol]

It matters because what you are talking is Invasion. I doubt whether your leaders are as lunatic as you are.

our present govement is too weak. we do need a tough leader.