What's new

India - Pakistan conflict analysis - aims, tactics, strategy, results

@Joe Shearer

shall we move on to Grandslam, or has Gibralter sapped our will to continue?

LOLOL.

I had hoped that your big days would distract your attention while I played with the kids.

Now that I have been caught red-handed goofing off, I will move onto Grand Slam and its subsequent developments, keeping to the same philosophy that you have proposed on the whole: no minute, hour-by-hour descriptions, just broad conclusions about lessons learnt by the Indian Army from those, the impact on common factors (I keep emphasising logistics because I am familiar with it, but obviously there are others that are going to be increasingly important), and the third, last focal point being the outlook for the Indian Army going forward.

I will get down to it immediately my household tasks are over, in an hour or two.

You did say some very interesting and relevant things about Gibraltar, and it did take up some time, both in introspection and in very interesting discussions with informed and currently engaged military professionals. You will not be surprised to learn that there were mixed reactions; there was a recognition of the real impact on the XV Corps, and the debilitation of its resources, and there was also a defensive reaction pointing to the Army (not Navy or Air Force) headcount between 47 and 62, and between 62 and 65, and again between 65 and 71. The defence being, predictably, that we have learnt our lessons, and there are now sufficient resources to baulk any sudden surge of valour among our neighbours.

Till 1'o'clock, then.
 
Operation Grand Slam and its ramifications
While there is already a brilliant summation available, in this and succeeding linked posts, an account of events subsequent to Operation Gibraltar will be presented. This account will consist of the following:
  1. Operation Grand Slam - the attack on Akhnoor-Chhamb-Jaurian;
  2. NORTHERN COMMAND
    1. Operations of Indian XI Corps
      1. 15th Inf. Div.
      2. 7th Inf. Div.
      3. 4th Mtn. Div.
    2. Operations of Indian I Corps
      1. 6th Mtn. Div.
      2. 14th Inf. Div.
      3. 26th Inf. Div.
  3. SOUTHERN COMMAND
    1. Operations south of I Corps
  4. Naval Operations: The PN at Dwarka
As usual, this will try to eschew an hour-by-hour narrative, and focus on the lessons learnt by the Indian Army during the conflict, thereafter, at the level of the entire set of events, an analysis of logistics requirements and an assessment of Indian Army needs in future, in the light of these events.

This may be a personal blind spot, but to an Indian observer or analyst, the actions of Pakistan's 12th Div. (under Akhtar Hussain Malik; 7th Div. under Yahya Khan) are no more than a prologue, a small collection of scenes setting the tone of the play; furthermore, the folklore surrounding this action is also a fixed narrative.

THE NUMBERS INVOLVED: This section, the southern part of the State of J&K, just to the north of its boundary with the Indian State of the Punjab, had always been guarded by a brigade; the Pakistan Army assembled a full division opposite it, with 3 full Brigades under its command, attacked without warning, and created terrible pressure on the Indian defences. Well, yes, more or less; but when we examine the situation in detail, we find a surprising situation rather different from what this bald statement of facts tends to show us.

First, 191 Brigade was an oversized brigade. A typical Indian Army brigade has 3 battalions, and perhaps a field artillery regiment (105 mm guns). 191 Brigade had no less than 5 battalions, and a full battalion each of the J&K Militia and the Punjab Armed Police, these being
  1. 3rd Mahar (+ 2 coys. of 3 J&K Militia);
  2. 6th Sikh LI (+ 2 coys. of 3 J&K Militia);
  3. 15th Kumaon;
  4. 9th Punjab;
  5. 5th Gorkha Rifles;
  6. 14th Field Artillery Regt. (+ 1 troop from 39 Medium Artillery Regt.);
  7. C Squadron 20th Lancers (deploying AMX 13 light tanks)
In addition, the battalion of Punjab Armed Police on border duties.

Normally, three brigades would be (3 x 3 =) 9 battalions in an Infantry division, and it should, on the face of it, have been 9 battalions under Pakistan Army's 12th Div., and it should have been opposed by a mere 3 battalions under the Indian brigade. In reality, there were (as listed above) no less than 5 battalions under 191 Brigade, and a full battalion of J&K Militia, so, 5 + 1, and we always omit to mention that two more brigades, 41st Mountain Brigade to serve in the front echelon and 28th Infantry Brigade in divisional reserve, had been assembled in the region, to serve under the newly raised 10th Infantry Division.

On top of that, the Pakistanis had 3 Brigades, but these were not 3-battalion brigades; 10th Brigade and 104th Brigade had only 2 battalions each, and the Azad Kashmir Brigade, 4th AK Brigade, had 3 battalions. So, a total of 7 battalions to oppose 191 Brigade's 6 and the strength of 41st Mtn Brigade and 28th Inf. Brigade; not the overwhelming odds as we tend to visualise when thinking of a forlorn brigade facing all the might of a division.

However, the Pakistanis were reasonably strong in artillery, with a full artillery brigade opposed to the regiment + a troop of the Indians; their armoured strength opposed 2 full armoured regiments, 11th Cavalry and 13th Lancers, to the solitary squadron of the Indian 20th Lancers.

It was by no means an overwhelming numerical superiority of the Pakistanis.

OTHER FACTORS: In fairness, the confusion on the Indian side needs to be understood.
  • The brigade commander of 191 Brigade, Brig. Master, had been killed in action in mid-August, when a strong contingent of the Gibraltar Force overwhelmed the border defences of the 191 Brigade (the PAP battalion) with support from their artillery; death of the Brigadier and his GSO3 happened during the attempted counter-attack due to shelling by the Pakistan artillery.
  • In addition, the induction of 10th Division into the field created its own confusion. It was inducted from Bangalore, so had no idea of local conditions or of the commanders' minds and personalities of the 191 Bde. and its constituent battalions, and certainly no idea about the newly-attached brigades, 41st Mtn Bde or 28th Inf. Bde.
  • Finally, there was an intense pressure on the Indian side caused by the irregular warfare that had broken out due to Gibraltar, along with the heavy artillery firing that had caused casualties already, as noted above.
That leads us to summarise the lessons that might have been learnt by the Indian Army, below.
  1. Pakistan will tend to use, wherever possible, irregulars in the first wave; as has been seen in 47-48, again in 65, again in 99, and as it is continuing today;
  2. PA artillery and regulars will support these irregulars to the fullest extent, without any declaration of war. In this present instance, it is sufficient to cite the heavy artillery support that their 12th Div. received, first, during the irregular phase, during Operation Gibraltar, and second, during the regular set-piece attack by 12th Div., Operation Grand Slam.
    1. Indian artillery needs strengthening, both with towed weapons from Akhnoor southwards, and SP weapons between Rajauri to Leh;
  3. India has tended to perform badly during changes of command or changes of duty, for instance, during Kaul's attempted take-over of 4th Corps in 62, and during 10th Div. take-over of 191 Bde., 41 Mtn. Bde., and 28th Inf. Bde. For that matter, Pulwama happened during the replacement of one unit on the LOC by its successor.
  4. The Indian Army is always caught by surprise by the opposition. We need both to raise the quality of our field intelligence, and the reaction time that we take to react. The PA seems to react by an order of magnitude faster.
  5. A personal opinion: asking a Mtn. Div. to serve in the plains is just not logical.
There are several other rather painful conclusions that emerge not only from this conflict but also from the recent border crises on the border with China, but it is appropriate to raise this at a later point. Let us wait for that point.

We come next to action by XI Corps.
 
Last edited:
This may be a personal blind spot, but to an Indian observer or analyst, the actions of Pakistan's 12th Div. (under Akhtar Hussain Malik; 7th Div. under Yahya Khan) are no more than a prologue, a small collection of scenes setting the tone of the play

If things would have gone according to GOC 12 Division desires, 12 Division would have veered towards Jammu, with 7 Division going towards Naushara.......Kashmir would have been more or less cut off from mainland India, road Jammu-Samba-Kathua interdicted.....

For that matter, Pulwama happened during the replacement of one unit on the LOC by its successor.

The Indian Army is always caught by surprise by the opposition. We need both to raise the quality of our field intelligence, and the reaction time that we take to react. The PA seems to react by an order of magnitude faster.

A personal opinion: asking a Mtn. Div. to serve in the plains is just not logical.

Lets not forget the change in IAF command last Feb as well, around PAF riposte.

IA army being caught be surprise, despite having superior ISR capabilities, has a multitude lessons of its own....how come Pakistan Army manages to achieve surprise (Gibralter, Grandslam, Khem Karan, Kishengarh, Chamb (71), Fazilka (71, PA 105 Brigade), Brass Tacks, Trident, Kargil, Parakaram, Swift Retort....to name a few)

Ofcourse, as already highlighted, a Mountain Division is neither trained nor equipped for operating in non-mountainous terrain.
 
If things would have gone according to GOC 12 Division desires, 12 Division would have veered towards Jammu, with 7 Division going towards Naushara.......Kashmir would have been more or less cut off from mainland India, road Jammu-Samba-Kathua interdicted.....

To be honest, I never understood the dichotomy. My understand was/is that the same units were to be managed by 7th Div only due to Yahya taking over. What was the difference between the two?

Lets not forget the change in IAF command last Feb as well, around PAF riposte.

IA army being caught be surprise, despite having superior ISR capabilities, has a multitude lessons of its own....how come Pakistan Army manages to achieve surprise (Gibralter, Grandslam, Khem Karan, Kishengarh, Chamb (71), Fazilka (71, PA 105 Brigade), Brass Tacks, Trident, Kargil, Parakaram, Swift Retort....to name a few)

  1. I didn't mention it for reasons of economy. It was, in fact, fairly high on my mind, along with the curiosity of the PAF having gone through a very major handing-over just weeks before, from Asghar Khan to Nur Khan, with no ill-effects whatever.
  2. What you have mentioned is a very strange thing, that the IA seems to be caught flat-footed on every single occasion.
Ofcourse, as already highlighted, a Mountain Division is neither trained nor equipped for operating in non-mountainous terrain.

It would not be proper of me to dwell on that, but I believe that a segregation into different theatres is essential. But that is so much above my pay-scale that there is no point in going into that.
 
This may be a personal blind spot, but to an Indian observer or analyst, the actions of Pakistan's 12th Div. (under Akhtar Hussain Malik; 7th Div. under Yahya Khan) are no more than a prologue, a small collection of scenes setting the tone of the play; furthermore, the folklore surrounding this action is also a fixed narrative.

THE NUMBERS INVOLVED: This section, the southern part of the State of J&K, just to the north of its boundary with the Indian State of the Punjab, had always been guarded by a brigade; the Pakistan Army assembled a full division opposite it, with 3 full Brigades under its command, attacked without warning, and created terrible pressure on the Indian defences. Well, yes, more or less; but when we examine the situation in detail, we find a surprising situation rather different from what this bald statement of facts tends to show us.

First, 191 Brigade was an oversized brigade. A typical Indian Army brigade has 3 battalions, and perhaps a field artillery regiment (105 mm guns). 191 Brigade had no less than 5 battalions, and a full battalion each of the J&K Militia and the Punjab Armed Police, these being
  1. 3rd Mahar (+ 2 coys. of 3 J&K Militia);
  2. 6th Sikh LI (+ 2 coys. of 3 J&K Militia);
  3. 15th Kumaon;
  4. 9th Punjab;
  5. 5th Gorkha Rifles;
  6. 14th Field Artillery Regt. (+ 1 troop from 39 Medium Artillery Regt.);
  7. C Squadron 20th Lancers (deploying AMX 13 light tanks)
In addition, the battalion of Punjab Armed Police on border duties.

Normally, three brigades would be (3 x 3 =) 9 battalions in an Infantry division, and it should, on the face of it, have been 9 battalions under Pakistan Army's 12th Div., and it should have been opposed by a mere 3 battalions under the Indian brigade. In reality, there were (as listed above) no less than 5 battalions under 191 Brigade, and a full battalion of J&K Militia, so, 5 + 1, and we always omit to mention that two more brigades, 41st Mountain Brigade to serve in the front echelon and 28th Infantry Brigade in divisional reserve, had been assembled in the region, to serve under the newly raised 10th Infantry Division.

On top of that, the Pakistanis had 3 Brigades, but these were not 3-battalion brigades; 10th Brigade and 104th Brigade had only 2 battalions each, and the Azad Kashmir Brigade, 4th AK Brigade, had 3 battalions. So, a total of 7 battalions to oppose 191 Brigade's 6 and the strength of 41st Mtn Brigade and 28th Inf. Brigade; not the overwhelming odds as we tend to visualise when thinking of a forlorn brigade facing all the might of a division.

However, the Pakistanis were reasonably strong in artillery, with a full artillery brigade opposed to the regiment + a troop of the Indians; their armoured strength opposed 2 full armoured regiments, 11th Cavalry and 13th Lancers, to the solitary squadron of the Indian 20th Lancers.

It was by no means an overwhelming numerical superiority of the Pakistanis.

OTHER FACTORS: In fairness, the confusion on the Indian side needs to be understood.
  • The brigade commander of 191 Brigade, Brig. Master, had been killed in action in mid-August, when a strong contingent of the Gibraltar Force overwhelmed the border defences of the 191 Brigade (the PAP battalion) with support from their artillery; death of the Brigadier and his GSO3 happened during the attempted counter-attack due to shelling by the Pakistan artillery.
  • In addition, the induction of 10th Division into the field created its own confusion. It was inducted from Bangalore, so had no idea of local conditions or of the commanders' minds and personalities of the 191 Bde. and its constituent battalions, and certainly no idea about the newly-attached brigades, 41st Mtn Bde or 28th Inf. Bde.
  • Finally, there was an intense pressure on the Indian side caused by the irregular warfare that had broken out due to Gibraltar, along with the heavy artillery firing that had caused casualties already, as noted above.
That leads us to summarise the lessons that might have been learnt by the Indian Army, below.
  1. Pakistan will tend to use, wherever possible, irregulars in the first wave; as has been seen in 47-48, again in 65, again in 99, and as it is continuing today;
  2. PA artillery and regulars will support these irregulars to the fullest extent, without any declaration of war. In this present instance, it is sufficient to cite the heavy artillery support that their 12th Div. received, first, during the irregular phase, during Operation Gibraltar, and second, during the regular set-piece attack by 12th Div., Operation Grand Slam.
    1. Indian artillery needs strengthening, both with towed weapons from Akhnoor southwards, and SP weapons between Rajauri to Leh;
  3. India has tended to perform badly during changes of command or changes of duty, for instance, during Kaul's attempted take-over of 4th Corps in 62, and during 10th Div. take-over of 191 Bde., 41 Mtn. Bde., and 28th Inf. Bde. For that matter, Pulwama happened during the replacement of one unit on the LOC by its successor.
  4. The Indian Army is always caught by surprise by the opposition. We need both to raise the quality of our field intelligence, and the reaction time that we take to react. The PA seems to react by an order of magnitude faster.
  5. A personal opinion: asking a Mtn. Div. to serve in the plains is just not logical.
There are several other rather painful conclusions that emerge not only from this conflict but also from the recent border crises on the border with China, but it is appropriate to raise this at a later point. Let us wait for that point.

We come next to action by XI Corps.

Point regarding IA artillery....we should remember that in Kargil conflict, in order to attain the artillery superiority, IA had to induct artillery even from Western and South Western Commands' Strike Formations....desperate times do call for desperate measures, but imagine if something would have happened in Indian Punjab or Rajasthan at the same moment.....it would have been a replay of Grandslam.
 
If things would have gone according to GOC 12 Division desires, 12 Division would have veered towards Jammu, with 7 Division going towards Naushara.......Kashmir would have been more or less cut off from mainland India, road Jammu-Samba-Kathua interdicted.....



Lets not forget the change in IAF command last Feb as well, around PAF riposte.

IA army being caught be surprise, despite having superior ISR capabilities, has a multitude lessons of its own....how come Pakistan Army manages to achieve surprise (Gibralter, Grandslam, Khem Karan, Kishengarh, Chamb (71), Fazilka (71, PA 105 Brigade), Brass Tacks, Trident, Kargil, Parakaram, Swift Retort....to name a few)

Ofcourse, as already highlighted, a Mountain Division is neither trained nor equipped for operating in non-mountainous terrain.

Is it true that there was little or no superiority of forces on the Pakistani side? That was an unwelcome discovery for me, having always taken it for granted that certain things happened due to certain circumstances.
 
To be honest, I never understood the dichotomy. My understand was/is that the same units were to be managed by 7th Div only due to Yahya taking over. What was the difference between the two?

Nopes, there were additional troops already earmarked for the push towards Naushara and Jammu.
 
Point regarding IA artillery....we should remember that in Kargil conflict, in order to attain the artillery superiority, IA had to induct artillery even from Western and South Western Commands' Strike Formations....desperate times do call for desperate measures, but imagine if something would have happened in Indian Punjab or Rajasthan at the same moment.....it would have been a replay of Grandslam.

Absolutely.

On artillery, I hope and pray that the plethora of options available to the IA will be exploited to the fullest (except that the difference in calibres is difficult to understand) and that there are full complements in every location. We in India need Artillery Divisions like mother's milk, considering the deterrent effect they would have on regular formations, and we are really shy of larger formations of more than brigade size.
 
Nopes, there were additional troops already earmarked for the push towards Naushara and Jammu.

??
Oh,really? Which were these?

It is strange, yes.....but it has happened. Personally, i believe that Indian belief in its own superiority always goes counter productive to its performance.

Oscar's point, which is so relevant.
 
Is it true that there was little or no superiority of forces on the Pakistani side? That was an unwelcome discovery for me, having always taken it for granted that certain things happened due to certain circumstances.

Well yes, it is true. Going as per numbers, there was hardly an instance when Pakistan attacked with an absolute majority.

Absolutely.

On artillery, I hope and pray that the plethora of options available to the IA will be exploited to the fullest (except that the difference in calibres is difficult to understand) and that there are full complements in every location. We in India need Artillery Divisions like mother's milk, considering the deterrent effect they would have on regular formations, and we are really shy of larger formations of more than brigade size.

Currently three IA artillery divisions are there against PA's 2. Its near parity.

??
Oh,really? Which were these?

Two additional brigades were earmarked. Operation Roll Top was the one against Naushara.
 
Well yes, it is true. Going as per numbers, there was hardly an instance when Pakistan attacked with an absolute majority.



Currently three IA artillery divisions are there against PA's 2. Its near parity.

Yes, that emerged from Signalian's ORBAT, but I think if our generals can't think ahead, they need more guns.:D

Should I go on to XI Corps?
 
It is strange, yes.....but it has happened. Personally, i believe that Indian belief in its own superiority always goes counter productive to its performance.

Well yes, it is true. Going as per numbers, there was hardly an instance when Pakistan attacked with an absolute majority.

Two additional brigades were earmarked. Operation Roll Top was the one against Naushara.

At the end of the day, my conclusion is that, like the Chinese in 62, the Pakistanis had the upper hand in 65 in Chhamb due to
  1. A clear plan;
  2. Close coordination between different ground forces units assigned to the same objectives;
  3. Purposefulness; they moved towards their goals, while we meandered around aimlessly.

If IA Generals cant think ahead, even nukes wont be of any use.

Shubh shubh bolo ji, shubh shubh bolo.....


Sure, why not.

In 1965, the Indian Army did not have a Northern Command. We had the Eastern Command, back at Calcutta after the 62 debacle, Central Command, at Lucknow, the older HQ of Eastern Command, Southern Command, with HQ at Pune, and the very important Western Command, that had a mandate from Leh to Sri Ganganagar in Rajasthan, just at the beginning of the Thar Desert.

To manage all this, the Army Commander had two Corps: XV Corps in Srinagar (XIV Corps didn't exist then) and XI Corps in Udhampur. We have seen how XV Corps was assaulted at all points by the contingents under Operation Gibraltar, and beat them back, not without taking casualties up to the level of Brigadier, and also captured the Haji Pir Pass, without, sadly, getting a grip on the heights bordering the Uri-Poonch Road. We have also seen how the short, sharp pressure led to a considerable diversion of troops to XV Corps, and left 191st Brigade alone to handle any pressure on the Jammu road*.

[* Thanks to inputs by @PanzerKiel, about the total effect of the Gibraltar contingents, about the inability to use the Uri-Poonch Road due to the heights overshadowing it being dominated by the Pakistan Army, and about the loss of Command reserves to the boiling situation in the Vale.]

According to conventional narrative, a lone, isolated 191st Brigade was suddenly attacked in full strength by an entire Pakistani Division; on further investigation, it turns out that the Brigade had been under attack for two weeks prior to the direct attack by the Pakistan regular Army, and had suffered the loss of the Brigade Commander to very heavy artillery barrages. It further turns out that 191st Brigade was quite beefy.

So why did General Harbaksh Singh, one of our best soldiers at the time, react so strongly to the thrust by 12th Div. against Chhamb? The following reasons applied:
  1. 191st Brigade was showing signs of wear and tear; three of its five battalions went into the hills to the north of the salient, two more were holding on by the skin of their teeth;
  2. Of the other brigades, 41st was handled roughly and retreated to the rear, passing through the 10th Div. reserves, 28th Brigade, and going past the Div. HQ towards the highway;
  3. Harbaksh had spent all his resources and his cupboard was bare. If the ongoing thrust by 12th Div. was to be fulfilled, there would be - difficulties.
So the General needed desperate measures. He took desperate measures.

In the first instance, he launched XI Corps at Lahore. Whether there was a real plan to capture Lahore or not is not known today any longer. What is known is that the initial target was the east bank of the Pakistani defensive feature, the Ichhogil Canal. Quite clearly, even this limited objective would jolt the Pakistan Army, and force them to adjust their military perspectives, or so seems to have been the thinking.

In the second instance, he sought to cut communications between Sialkot and Lahore. For this, he deployed I Armoured Corps. This Corps, newly raised, was in addition to his original XV Corps (in Srinagar) and XI Corps. It was commanded by Lt. Gen. P. O. Dunn, whom we have seen earlier commanding the defending division when the skirmishes at Chhad Bet had broken out.

We shall see in summary form, purely from the Indian Army point of view, what happened along each of these axes of attack, for XI Corps, by 4th Mountain Div., 7th Infantry Div. and 15th Infantry Div., and for I Corps, by 1st Armoured Div., 6th Mountain Div., 14th Infantry Div. and 26th Infantry Div., and the conclusions from these actions.
(to be cont.)
 
Last edited:
At the end of the day, my conclusion is that, like the Chinese in 62, the Pakistanis had the upper hand in 65 in Chhamb due to
  1. A clear plan;
  2. Close coordination between different ground forces units assigned to the same objectives;
  3. Purposefulness; they moved towards their goals, while we meandered around aimlessly.



Shubh shubh bolo ji, shubh shubh bolo.....




In 1965, the Indian Army did not have a Northern Command. We had the Eastern Command, back at Calcutta after the 62 debacle, Central Command, at Lucknow, the older HQ of Eastern Command, Southern Command, with HQ at Pune, and the very important Western Command, that had a mandate from Leh to Sri Ganganagar in Rajasthan, just at the beginning of the Thar Desert.

To manage all this, the Army Commander had two Corps: XV Corps in Srinagar (XIV Corps didn't exist then) and XI Corps in Udhampur. We have seen how XV Corps was assaulted at all points by the contingents under Operation Gibraltar, and beat them back, not without taking casualties up to the level of Brigadier, and also captured the Haji Pir Pass, without, sadly, getting a grip on the heights bordering the Uri-Poonch Road. We have also seen how the short, sharp pressure led to a considerable diversion of troops to XV Corps, and left 191st Brigade alone to handle any pressure on the Jammu road*.

[* Thanks to inputs by @PanzerKiel, about the total effect of the Gibraltar contingents, about the inability to use the Uri-Poonch Road due to the heights overshadowing it being dominated by the Pakistan Army, and about the loss of Command reserves to the boiling situation in the Vale.]

According to conventional narrative, a lone, isolated 191st Brigade was suddenly attacked in full strength by an entire Pakistani Division; on further investigation, it turns out that the Brigade had been under attack for two weeks prior to the direct attack by the Pakistan regular Army, and had suffered the loss of the Brigade Commander to very heavy artillery barrages. It further turns out that 191st Brigade was quite beefy.

So why did General Harbaksh Singh, one of our best soldiers at the time, react so strongly to the thrust by 12th Div. against Chhamb? The following reasons applied:
  1. 191st Brigade was showing signs of wear and tear; three of its five battalions went into the hills to the north of the salient, two more were holding on by the skin of their teeth;
  2. Of the other brigades, 41st was handled roughly and retreated to the rear, passing through the 10th Div. reserves, 28th Brigade, and going past the Div. HQ towards the highway;
  3. Harbaksh had spent all his resources and his cupboard was bare. If the ongoing thrust by 12th Div. was to be fulfilled, there would be - difficulties.
So the General needed desperate measures. He took desperate measures.

In the first instance, he launched XI Corps at Lahore. Whether there was a real plan to capture Lahore or not is not known today any longer. What is known is that the initial target was the east bank of the Pakistani defensive feature, the Ichhogil Canal. Quite clearly, even this limited objective would jolt the Pakistan Army, and force them to adjust their military perspectives, or so seems to have been the thinking.

In the second instance, he sought to cut communications between Sialkot and Lahore. For this, he deployed I Armoured Corps. This Corps, newly raised, was in addition to his original XV Corps (in Srinagar) and XI Corps. It was commanded by Lt. Gen. P. O. Dunn, whom we have seen earlier commanding the defending division when the skirmishes at Chhad Bet had broken out.

We shall see in summary form, purely from the Indian Army point of view, what happened along each of these axes of attack, for XI Corps, by 4th Mountain Div., 7th Infantry Div. and 15th Infantry Div., and for I Corps, by 1st Armoured Div., 6th Mountain Div., 14th Infantry Div. and 26th Infantry Div., and the conclusions from these actions.
(to be cont.)

We'll discuss XI Corps operations later of course, but since you have made a mention, so some points...

Indian XI Corps did not enjoy the advantage of PA in Lahore sector.......that is, PA defences were based on BRB / Ichogil canal while XI did not have any formidable geographical or a water obstacle to base its defences. Capturing of area upto the canal till Kasur (4 Mtn Division) would have greatly improved the defensibility of XI Corps area and would have provided added security to Indian Punjab and its main cities. As per my understanding after reading Indian books, Lahore was a be-prepared mission which Indian Army was supposed to go for in case the opportunity presented itself and PA may be unable to defend it (3 Jat took the advantage). However, capture of all land till BRB was certainly one of the main aims of 7, 15 and 4 Mountain Divisions.

For the Indian offensive in Sialkot Sector, there was an Indian plan even in late 50s / early 60s where by Indian offensive was supposed to reach Marala Ravi Link Canal in the first phase, and then reach GT Road in order to cut it. Sialkot and Shakergarh would have been isolated and Marala Headworks would have been captured as well.

Indian 1 Corps has its own litany of.....well dont know that to call it......to start with, a newly raised Corps which had not even started to function as a Corps, no coordination, the Corps Commander was junior to his armored division commander Rajinder Sparrow.....list goes on....
 
Back
Top Bottom