India opposes fresh sanctions against Iran

[Ingis]

Well i think India is becoming more independent now and looking out for its interests, but if tomorrow America can pressure India into accepting sanctions, then we will know who is the master of who.

LOL... it seems you are completely unaware of anything related to recent developments in foreign affairs, but you are yet too eager to comment.

India went head on against USA during the Copenhagen summit and WTO Doha talks. India received so much flak for not listening to the Americans at Copenhagen and Doha, but yet we stood for our interests. USA repeatedly pressurizes India to join the "anti-China club", but India has consistently refused to do so.

If India in the past voted against Iran, it was for its own interests - India does not want to see another nuclear weapons state in the region. Today, if India is supporting Iran it is again for its own interests as priorities have changed - India wants Iran's oil and gas and also cooperation in fighting Taliban in Afghanistan.

For India, its own interests is paramount. If Iran remains friendly to India and operates within the sphere of Indian interests, then Iran can very see an ally in India irrespective of what USA says. If you guys become too cozy with our rivals, then do not expect any friendliness from our side.

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

LOL... it seems you are completely unaware of anything related to recent developments in foreign affairs, but you are yet too eager to comment.

India went head on against USA during the Copenhagen summit and WTO Doha talks. India received so much flak for not listening to the Americans at Copenhagen and Doha, but yet we stood for our interests. USA repeatedly pressurizes India to join the "anti-China club", but India has consistently refused to do so.

That's why like a cheap prostitute it kept trying to sell itself as a "counter-weight" to China. It's key selling point (KSP) was that "INDIA WOULD CONTAIN CHINA ON BEHALF OF THE FREE WORLD" and that it was the "ONLY VIABLE SUPER-POWER IN ASIA.)

If India in the past voted against Iran, it was for its own interests - India does not want to see another nuclear weapons state in the region. Today, if India is supporting Iran it is again for its own interests as priorities have changed - India wants Iran's oil and gas and also cooperation in fighting Taliban in Afghanistan.

For India, its own interests is paramount. If Iran remains friendly to India and operates within the sphere of Indian interests, then Iran can very see an ally in India irrespective of what USA says.

That's right, India is so DESPERATE IN NEED of energy. What happened to the 1-2-3 deal??? How come no world from Massa??? When will the first nuke plant become operational??? Years, if not decades.

And this whole 'India is voting for Iran' is irrelevant. Why? Because India is irrelevant, it doesn't hold any sway or clout -- who cares what it says (since it speaks with forked tongues). People listen to Brazil, especially since it represents South America. But what does India represent? It doesn't even represent Sri Lank or Nepal, much less BD and Pakistan.

 

[Ingis]

That's why like a cheap prostitute it kept trying to sell itself as a "counter-weight" to China. It's key selling point (KSP) was that "INDIA WOULD CONTAIN CHINA ON BEHALF OF THE FREE WORLD" and that it was the "ONLY VIABLE SUPER-POWER IN ASIA.)

Hey Chinese imposter,

Why don't you just shut up! The Indian government has never tried to express itself as a counter-weight to China. It is just some elements in the media which want India and China to be fighting against each other.

And this whole 'India is voting for Iran' is irrelevant. Why? Because India is irrelevant, it doesn't hold any sway or clout -- who cares what it says (since it speaks with forked tongues). People listen to Brazil, especially since it represents South America. But what does India represent? It doesn't even represent Sri Lank or Nepal, much less BD and Pakistan.

Right man. India is absolutely irrelevant. That is why some retarded people are so jobless in life that they roam around various forums bashing India.

There is a saying in India,

Jab dushman tumhare khilaaf bol raha ho, samjho tarakki kar rahe ho

I'm pretty sure you understood it given your Chineseness . So, I won't bother to translate.

 

[Nima]

There is not much of a difference between bravado and stupidity. Americans are the rulers of the present world and they end up getting what they want. If you read about how the Indian civilian nuclear deal was signed, Bush apparently railroaded through countries like China. Now when China, a country with much more international clout than India was forced to kowtow to the US's demands, what can India do in this case?

Coming back to the topic, this makes absolute sense. Sanctions do not make sense since most of these affect the common public for not direct fault of theirs. I have always felt it is incorrect to check Iran while turn the other way when Israel (clandestinely) builds a stockpile of nuclear weapons. I find it worrying that Israel has decided to stay out the nuclear summit.

We have this attitude today because we were on top in the past and we know how you can easily fall on your ***.
Iran's capital was called the "richest city under the sun" by Greeks and our empire had the best and the biggest of everything.
After a couple of centuries our arrogance cost us our empire.

America today is not stronger than Persia during the Greco-Persian wars. India has never been a ruler of its corner of the planet so naturally you guys have that defeatist attitude.

 

[humanfirst]

That's why like a cheap prostitute it kept trying to sell itself as a "counter-weight" to China. It's key selling point (KSP) was that "INDIA WOULD CONTAIN CHINA ON BEHALF OF THE FREE WORLD" and that it was the "ONLY VIABLE SUPER-POWER IN ASIA.)



That's right, India is so DESPERATE IN NEED of energy. What happened to the 1-2-3 deal??? How come no world from Massa??? When will the first nuke plant become operational??? Years, if not decades.

And this whole 'India is voting for Iran' is irrelevant. Why? Because India is irrelevant, it doesn't hold any sway or clout -- who cares what it says (since it speaks with forked tongues). People listen to Brazil, especially since it represents South America. But what does India represent? It doesn't even represent Sri Lank or Nepal, much less BD and Pakistan.

If it was india voting in favour of sanctions you guys would be whining about what an obedient dog of usa is india.And about being prostitute of usa,that too coming from a pakistani,we always did what it suits our interest whether it is nuclear deal with usa or more important deals with russia,You can see that all our dealings with other countries suits us in one way or other.We didnt allow our country to be whacked by terrorists every week for the sake of usa.We all know who is the prostitute of usa and got "aids"

 

[Nima]

btw why is a s s censored??
you gotta be kidding me

 

[amoverlord]

That\'s why like a cheap prostitute it kept trying to sell itself as a \"counter-weight\" to China. It\'s key selling point (KSP) was that \"INDIA WOULD CONTAIN CHINA ON BEHALF OF THE FREE WORLD\" and that it was the \"ONLY VIABLE SUPER-POWER IN ASIA.)



That\'s right, India is so DESPERATE IN NEED of energy. What happened to the 1-2-3 deal??? How come no world from Massa??? When will the first nuke plant become operational??? Years, if not decades.

And this whole \'India is voting for Iran\' is irrelevant. Why? Because India is irrelevant, it doesn\'t hold any sway or clout -- who cares what it says (since it speaks with forked tongues). People listen to Brazil, especially since it represents South America. But what does India represent? It doesn\'t even represent Sri Lank or Nepal, much less BD and Pakistan.

hey u!!!! mind ur language......india is my motherland......if i reciprocate to u n say cute praises about ur mother then u\'ll be very sorry......
but then,i\'ll retain my sensibility n not stoop to ur level.....so keep ur dirty,pig sty language to urself n within the likes of u......

i have reported ur post.....n hope that mods will put a tight leash on u,,,,,,,

 

[Speaker]

We have this attitude today because we were on top in the past and we know how you can easily fall on your ***.
Iran's capital was called the "richest city under the sun" by Greeks and our empire had the best and the biggest of everything.
After a couple of centuries our arrogance cost us our empire.

America today is not stronger than Persia during the Greco-Persian wars. India has never been a ruler of its corner of the planet so naturally you guys have that defeatist attitude.

Notwithstanding your country's situation, the arrogance still seems well and alive. All civilizations were rich and had the "best of everything" at some point or the other. I don't want to start kindergarten argument of who's daddy is strongest, but India and China were the wealthiest countries for a better part of history.

If practicality is the same as defeatist, then you are free to judge. That doesn't affect me.

 

[Ruag]

We have this attitude today because we were on top in the past and we know how you can easily fall on your ***.
Iran's capital was called the "richest city under the sun" by Greeks and our empire had the best and the biggest of everything.
After a couple of centuries our arrogance cost us our empire.

America today is not stronger than Persia during the Greco-Persian wars. India has never been a ruler of its corner of the planet so naturally you guys have that defeatist attitude.

Hmm... Persia faring better than India in the past? We all know how the Argeads ran over the Persians and how they were stopped by a small Indian kingdom. We all know how the Iranians surrendered to the Arab Caliphate and abandoned its ancient traditions to embrace Islam. Compare that to India which fought for and still proudly embraces its ancient Vedic traditions.

Yet, these Persians have the audacity to claim that Indians have "defeatist attitude".

Keep taking pride in the what the ancient Greeks called the capital of Persian empire centuries ago. Usually, those who have made no achievements in their lifetime often boast about the accomplishments of their ancestors.

 

[sensenreason]

Some observations...

- Israel wants Iran to cstop Irans program but has no political space with US
- US is focusing on sanctioning Iran and not use force
- Iran is quite confident that it can take the pressure
- India opposing sanctions against Iran
- China supports sanctions against Iran now...

 

[Nima]

Notwithstanding your country's situation, the arrogance still seems well and alive. All civilizations were rich and had the "best of everything" at some point or the other. I don't want to start kindergarten argument of who's daddy is strongest, but India and China were the wealthiest countries for a better part of history.

If practicality is the same as defeatist, then you are free to judge. That doesn't affect me.

India wasn't
How many times did we kick your back side over the years?

And yeah India was rich but lets fuckin check your population shall we???
Iran @ the turn of the century had less then 10 million people and our country was even bigger than today!!!!
It's like saying India is richer than Iran today! Yes you are but it's the per capita that matters and most of you don't even have a damn toilet.

Hmm... Persia faring better than India in the past? We all know how the Argeads ran over the Persians and how they were stopped by a small Indian kingdom. We all know how the Iranians surrendered to the Arab Caliphate and abandoned its ancient traditions to embrace Islam. Compare that to India which fought for and still proudly embraces its ancient Vedic traditions.

Yet, these Persians have the audacity to claim that Indians have "defeatist attitude".

Keep taking pride in the what the ancient Greeks called the capital of Persian empire centuries ago. Usually, those who have made no achievements in their lifetime often boast about the accomplishments of their ancestors.

I used the Achamanids as an example
We have had tens of empires over the years.
India hasn't done **** but be slaves to everybody else from the Brits to the Persians.

---------- Post added at 10:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 PM ----------

Some observations...

- Israel wants Iran to cstop Irans program but has no political space with US
- US is focusing on sanctioning Iran and not use force
- Iran is quite confident that it can take the pressure
- India opposing sanctions against Iran
- China supports sanctions against Iran now...

HA?????????????????

 

[Prayag]

hey Indians calm down
Don't expect us to say thank you. This is not how we Iranians do business. Whether you support us or hate us makes no difference, up to you.

Probably this is why most of the world hates you. Sheer arrogance and illusionary mentality. Well good luck!

 

[sensenreason]

India wasn't
How many times did we kick your back side over the years?

And yeah India was rich but lets fuckin check your population shall we???
Iran @ the turn of the century had less then 10 million people and our country was even bigger than today!!!!
It's like saying India is richer than Iran today! Yes you are but it's the per capita that matters and most of you don't even have a damn toilet.

I used the Achamanids as an example
We have had tens of empires over the years.
India hasn't done **** but be slaves to everybody else from the Brits to the Persians.

---------- Post added at 10:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 PM ----------

[/B]

HA?????????????????

China supports Barack Obama's call for new Iran sanctions | World news | The Guardian

The reason Tim Geithner rushed to Beijing from New Delhi (unscheduled visit at that) was as China has relented on two items..

- Yuan devaluation
- Iran sanctions

in return US will tone down support to Dalai Lama (which peaked lately) and also Taiwan and step back from offering India some sort of a financial deal wrt US dollar which is what Geithner discussed in Delhi....no wonder Israel backed off the Nuke summit as they know the sanctions are the agreed way forward between G2 and they wont be allowed to use force as they wanted...

 

[Nima]

Probably this is why most of the world hates you. Sheer arrogance and illusionary mentality. Well good luck!

oh I'm sorry maybe we should bend over for every invading army that comes into town like certain people and then everybody would love us as well.
Not gonna happen son, not gonna happen.

btw, we don't need luck.
We learn to sacrifice ourselves for our country when the time comes, you can't defeat a nation that has this attitude. We are a fighting nation, you guys rather make babies and sing kumbaya.

 

[Nima]

China supports Barack Obama's call for new Iran sanctions | World news | The Guardian

The reason Tim Geithner rushed to Beijing from New Delhi (unscheduled visit at that) was as China has relented on two items..

- Yuan devaluation
- Iran sanctions

in return US will tone down support to Dalai Lama (which peaked lately) and also Taiwan and step back from offering India some sort of a financial deal wrt US dollar which is what Geithner discussed in Delhi....no wonder Israel backed off the Nuke summit as they know the sanctions are the agreed way forward between G2 and they wont be allowed to use force as they wanted...

lmao
come back when China votes for it in the security council