What's new

India may fail to defend itself from Pakistani missiles: Expert

We are in the process of developing BMD. At present we may not defend fully from Pakistani missiles, but in another 10 years or so, the BMD should be good enough for stopping 90% of Pakistani missiles.

I don't understand, why the Americans are spending billions upon billions of dollars to make a (Real) operational system, when they can simply go to Indians and or Israelis and buy a fully operational system for fraction of what they have been spending. :close_tema:
 
yes babur 3 SLCM. you are most likely, color blind. get yourself checked by a doctor.

I am not color blind, your propagandists might be.

if only i get a penny every time I hear that, it always ends up being Russian as "Your own"

It is not an easy task although the system has been tested successfully several times & its tracking & FC radars had been installed at many places. Something's cooking...

I don't understand, why the Americans are spending billions upon billions of dollars to make a (Real) operational system, when they can simply go to Indians and or Israelis and buy a fully operational system for fraction of what they have been spending. :close_tema:

American are developing systems to intercept ICBMs.
 
I don't understand, why the Americans are spending billions upon billions of dollars to make a (Real) operational system, when they can simply go to Indians and or Israelis and buy a fully operational system for fraction of what they have been spending. :close_tema:

Technology is not static and it takes time to evolve. And there is a collaboration between Americans, Indians and Israelis for a credible ABM system. In next 10 year, Indian defense budget should be around $150 billion, enough to afford a ABM system.
 
India.

India big.
India strong.
India fancy.

Pakistan small.
Pakistan backward.
Pakistan bruised.

India still not directly attack Pakistan.

India big, strong, fancy... baby.

Talk is cheap.

-An Ape
 
ISLAMABAD: India may not be able to fully defend itself from a possible Pakistani nuclear strike in a conflict despite the country's heavy investments in developing anti-ballistic missile systems, a Russian nuclear expert has cautioned.


Petr Topychkanov, a senior researcher at the Carnegie Moscow Centre's Non-Proliferation Programme, said that despite large scale cooperation between India and Israel for the development of a ballistic missile defence system and India's efforts for acquiring S-400 defence systems from Russia, it is "very far" from defending itself from a Pakistani missile attack.

"Even in 10 years and with the huge budgets that India plans to spend on the development of nuclear weapons and capabilities, it is difficult to imagine it will be able to defend its territory from possible strikes from Pakistan in case of conflict," Topychkanov was quoted as saying by the Dawn.

Talking about India's candidature for the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), Topychkanov said the world will be cautious about India.

"The nuclear waiver given to Indian became a very important part of the lesson for the international community because Delhi did not give a lot in exchange, it didn't change policies and approaches," he said.

About Russia's policy for strategic stability in South Asia, Topychkanov said Moscow is interested in regional strategic stability and is working on avoiding crisis in the area.

He said despite longstanding strategic partnership with India, Russia was developing relations with both Islamabad and New Delhi.

India successfully test-fired its indigenously developed supersonic interceptor missile from a test range off Odisha coast on Sunday which is capable of destroying any incoming ballistic missile, prompting Pakistan to say that it would disturb the balance of power in the region and it plans to raise the issue at the international level.




http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...tani-missiles-expert/articleshow/52344164.cms


Bechara, Trying desperately to woo India back for Mother Roooshia .. Have a look at his other Op-Eds ..

    • OP-ED
    Trump Era of US-South Asia Ties Has Good and Bad News for Russia
    • NOVEMBER 28, 2016
    • RUSSIA & INDIA REPORT

    Speculations about the U.S. policy in South Asia may be right or wrong. But at least one thing is clear. In his policy toward South Asia, Trump will follow his understanding of pragmatic and realistic interests of the United States, and not seek how to please leaders of South Asian countries and beyond, including Russia.

    • OP-ED
    Moscow and New Delhi Disconnect
    • OCTOBER 28, 2016
    • ASIA & THE PACIFIC POLICY SOCIETY

    India and Russia need to undertake a fresh and frank appraisal of each other if their strategic partnership is to deepen and endure beyond high-level weapons and energy cooperation.

    • OP-ED
    What Is Russia’s Plan With India?
    • OCTOBER 22, 2016
    • NEWSWEEK

    Russia badly needs to produce a long-term strategy towards India and the region of south Asia, and to stop thinking about India and Pakistan tactically and separately.

    • OP-ED
    Deep Military Cooperation Between Russia and Pakistan Threatens Delhi
    • OCTOBER 11, 2016
    • RUSSIA DIRECT

    Russia's recent military exercises with Pakistan showed that Moscow still views many international issues through the prism of its relations with the U.S. Such a position might put Russia-India relations at risk.

    • OP-ED
    Pakistan Cannot Influence Russia’s Strategic Partnership With India
    • MAY 25, 2016
    • RUSSIA BEYOND THE HEADLINES

    Pakistan cannot replace or even influence Russia’s strategic partnership with India. India will always play a very special role in Russia's foreign policy and Russia is very much interested in keeping the strategic level of its ties with India.

    • OP-ED
    Premonition of Nuclear Threat
    • DECEMBER 28, 2015
    • RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL

    A recently published report examines factors that contribute to an atmosphere in which the use of nuclear weapons in the Euro-Atlantic region becomes more probable than immediately after the end of the Cold War.

    • OP-ED
    Prime Partner
    • DECEMBER 16, 2015
    • INDIA TODAY

    Despite looking at others for high-tech defense deals, India lacks a steady partner that can replace Russia. Moscow, too, badly needs such cooperation.

    • OP-ED
    Prospects for Foreign Military Presence in Afghanistan
    • DECEMBER 10, 2015
    • RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL

    There are several reasons for extending the military presence of the United States and its allies in Afghanistan.

 
We shud consult that times now expert....
 
Indians on this thread .. " these Russian experts dont know anything . they are noob while on the other hand zeetv's cartoon is an expert in his field "
 
Indians on this thread .. " these Russian experts dont know anything . they are noob while on the other hand zeetv's cartoon is an expert in his field "

His credentials had been posted in the first page- he doesn't seem to be an expert in this.
 
We are in the process of developing BMD. At present we may not defend fully from Pakistani missiles, but in another 10 years or so, the BMD should be good enough for stopping 90% of Pakistani missiles.

Not even 30%
 
immune neither side they both has chance to get hit even though both country is covered by SAM
decrease the chance by a good SAM is yes
if s400 and s500 covers the whole india which is not easy and expensive it will help a lot to india
 
Technology is not static and it takes time to evolve. And there is a collaboration between Americans, Indians and Israelis for a credible ABM system. In next 10 year, Indian defense budget should be around $150 billion, enough to afford a ABM system.

Yeah yeah indians we don't have any missile .. you are safe now go to sleep.. It's winter..and you know if call of nature comes you'll have to go to the Fields or Railway track at this time of night.. 150$ billion won't help you ..:whistle::wave:
 
BMDs are such unproven tech and missiles are designed to evade them. The success rate will probably be around under 50%. It's a good way to burn your money and give the nation a false sense of security. Even if 5 nukes hit their target that can cripple a nation as big as India.
 
Back
Top Bottom