What's new

India linchpin in new US military strategy, says Panetta

Moazam Khan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
NEW DELHI, June 6: Pentagon chief Leon Panetta vowed on Wednesday to expand defence ties between India and the United States, saying New Delhi was a `linchpin’ in a new US military strategy focused on Asia.

At a think-tank in the Indian capital, Me Panetta said that military ties had dramatically improved over the past decade.
But he said more work was needed to ensure the two countries could safeguard the `crossroads’ of the global economy spanning the Indian Ocean and the Western Pacific.

“For this relationship to truly provide security for this region and for the world, we will need to deepen our defence and security cooperation.

“This is why I have come to India,” Mr Panetta told an audience at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses.

Having overcome suspicions from the Cold War-era, “our two nations I believe have finally and irreversibly started a new chapter of our history”.Mr Panetta, who met Indian leaders on Tuesday and Wednesday, said he believed the relationship “can and should become more strategic, more practical, and more collaborative.”

He said a new US strategy sought to “expand our military partnerships and our presence in the arc extending from the Western Pacific and East Asia into the Indian Ocean region and South Asia.”

“Defence cooperation with India is a linchpin in this strategy.”

Mr Panetta called for more joint research and production, expanding military exercises and for both countries to tackle legal dilemmas posed by space weapons and cyber warfare.

India favours improving military ties and buying weapons from the United States but does not want to become a full-fledged American ally, preferring a degree of breathing space, analysts say.

Ties with Pakistan

A day after Al Qaeda’s number two leader was killed in a drone strike in Pakistan, Mr Panetta acknowledged that both India and the United States faced difficulties with Islamabad.

“Pakistan is a complicated relationship for both of our countries, but one that we must work to improve,” he said.

Mr Panetta said both the United States and India wanted to see China play a prominent role in the region.

“As the United States and India deepen our defence partnership with each other, both of us will also seek to strengthen our relations with China,” he said.

He hailed growing arms sales with India but said both countries needed to remove obstacles that were holding back defence trade and the transfer of technology.

“To realise the full potential of defence trade relations, we need to cut through the bureaucratic red tape on both sides,” he said.

Drone attacks
Mr Panetta said that the US would continue to launch drone attacks against Al Qaeda in Pakistan despite complaints from Islamabad that the strikes violated its sovereignty.
“We have made it very clear that we are going to continue to defend ourselves,” he said.
“This is about our sovereignty as well,” he said, arguing that Al Qaeda militants who orchestrated the Sept 11 attacks on the United States were in Pakistan’s tribal areas
 
. .
India's Foreign Policy secures Indian interests First. .........India First, Always

Doesn't matter what USA wants, India has and will always put Indian interests first. Indo china relations will remain the same, they will remain India's largest trading partners irrespective of what other idiots wish for.
 
.
Link please.
India linchpin in new US military strategy, says Panetta | DAWN.COM

India's Foreign Policy secures Indian interests First. .........India First, Always

Doesn't matter what USA wants, India has and will always put Indian interests first. Indo china relations will remain the same, they will remain India's largest trading partners irrespective of what other idiots wish for.
Come on dear. Come out of this fallacy please. China has encircled you with its brilliant ' String of Pearls ' policy and you are giving starry-eyed speculations on Indo-China relations :O .
 
.
Thank you america .. We may need your full support in futre conflicts
 
.
.
From the west perspective

India not sold on closer military ties with U.S.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta meets with Indian officials, seeking enhanced defense cooperation. But India seems more interested in buying U.S. arms.
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta meets with Indian officials, seeking to boost military ties between the two nations.

By David S. Cloud and Mark Magnier, Los Angeles Times

June 6, 2012, 6:27 p.m.
NEW DELHI — Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta urged India on Wednesday to build a closer military relationship with the United States, but Indian leaders appeared more interested in buying U.S. weapons than in aligning strategically with Washington.

Senior Indian officials made it clear in two days of talks that they will continue to set their own course on U.S. national security priorities, including isolating Iran and building upAfghanistan'smilitary forces, sometimes in tandem with Washington and sometimes not.

Panetta is visiting Asia this week to bolster military ties as the Obama administration, wary ofChina's growing clout in the region, seeks to reassert America's presence in the Pacific after a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Pentagon chief described enhanced defense cooperation with India as "a linchpin" of the new strategy. But India has charted an independent foreign policy for decades, and its response was decidedly cool.

Panetta held meetings with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Defense Minister A.K. Antony, National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon and other government officials. But he did not hold a joint news conference with his Indian counterpart, as he usually does when he visits friendly countries.

"We'll never be an alliance partner with the U.S.," said Lalit Mansingh, an analyst and a former Indian ambassador to Washington. "The limit is a partnership."

The Pentagon has stationed tens of thousands of troops, plus aircraft and warships, at bases in Japan and South Korea since the end of World War II. But the U.S. withdrew from most of Southeast Asia after the Vietnam War ended in 1975, and major bases in the Philippines closed in the early 1990s.

The U.S. maintains a large Navy ship and submarine support facility and air base on Diego Garcia, a British-controlled atoll in the Indian Ocean. It has no bases in India.

The new strategy aims to restore aU.S. militarypresence across the Asia-Pacific region, but not by building permanent bases or deploying large forces.

Instead, Panetta emphasized, the United States seeks to build up the militaries of friendly governments with arms sales and joint training with U.S. forces deployed on short rotations. The message was meant to reassure Indian officials, who are eager to modernize their armed forces but not to appear too cozy with Washington.

"Our vision is a peaceful Indian Ocean region supported by growing Indian capabilities," Panetta said in a speech at the Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses, a think tank associated with the Indian military. "America will do its part … but the fundamental challenge is to develop India's capabilities so it can respond to challenges."

U.S. officials have said publicly that the new strategy is not aimed at confronting China, but Panetta's trip took him to India and Vietnam, two of China's historic rivals. Both nations have border and territorial disputes with Beijing and concerns about its expanding military might.

Senior officials traveling with Panetta said they hoped India would take a greater role in training Afghan army and police forces as the U.S. and its allies withdraw combat troops from Afghanistan over the next 2 1/2 years.

India brings a small number of Afghan officers to its military academies for instruction. It has balked at sending Indian troops to Afghanistan, even as trainers.

Panetta's travel plans don't include a stop in Pakistan, where CIA drone strikes this week killed Al Qaeda's No. 2 leader. Pakistan has repeatedly condemned the drone attacks as a violation of its sovereignty. It has also refused to allow truck convoys to supply U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan since errant U.S. airstrikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in November, causing severe strains in relations.

In answer to a question at the think tank, Panetta was blunt about the problems between Islamabad and Washington.

"It's a complicated relationship, oftentimes frustrating, oftentimes difficult," he said. "They have provided some cooperation. There are other times when frankly that cooperation is not there. But the United States cannot just walk away from that relationship."

He urged India to improve relations with its traditional rival. The nuclear-armed neighbors have fought three wars since 1947.

India is the world's largest arms importer. Washington was disappointed last year when U.S. companies lost out on a $12-billion deal to sell 126 fighter jets to New Delhi.

India maintains that the U.S. offered older aircraft technology. Officials also bridle at what they see as U.S. reluctance to transfer other sensitive technology, and Washington's insistence on after-sales, on-site inspections of equipment, part of U.S. policy to ensure sophisticated weapons aren't diverted to rogue states.

There are some signs that New Delhi and Washington are finding some middle ground, analysts said.

Several arms deals in the pipeline, amounting to about $8 billion in sales, have been signed with U.S. companies, partially allaying concern on Capitol Hill that India isn't fully committed to a defense relationship.

Both sides reportedly also are looking for ways to prevent diversion of sensitive technology without intrusive inspections.

India not sold on closer military ties with U.S. - latimes.com
 
. . .
India should be the ally of US if it not for the war of terror where US constantly arms and funds Pakistani Army. This itself reflects the complicated relationship, I think India will always overtly reject the idea of being lynchpin to America's strategy, but covertly be accept the role.
 
. .
India should be the ally of US if it not for the war of terror where US constantly arms and funds Pakistani Army. This itself reflects the complicated relationship, I think India will always overtly reject the idea of being lynchpin to America's strategy, but covertly be accept the role.

I think they already have the role
 
.
panetta again used deceitful words: anglo-americans didn't go to india for al qaeda. they went into afghanistan for india, which they did in turn to battle china.
 
. .
panetta again used deceitful words: anglo-americans didn't go to india for al qaeda. they went into afghanistan for india, which they did in turn to battle china.

A battle they are destined to lose
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom