Chanakyaa
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 6,538
- Reaction score
- -36
- Country
- Location
Congratulations Dude.LOL at the Indian going bonkers from the Doklam humiliation!
You just Proved you cannot understand Plain English.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Congratulations Dude.LOL at the Indian going bonkers from the Doklam humiliation!
Wrong Assessment.
Proof : Doklam ,2017.
Read & Educate of what INDIA DID : https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/doklam-who-won
which says :
Unless China brings back the bulldozers soon, India will have won this round.
Which INDIA DID.
Yes....you know bestWrong Assessment.
Proof : Doklam ,2017.
Read & Educate of what INDIA DID : https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/doklam-who-won
which says :
Unless China brings back the bulldozers soon, India will have won this round.
Which INDIA DID.
Okay... Can Pakistan do in Kashmir what China just did in Ladakh?... IM JUST GIVING INDIA MORE CHANCES TO "WIN".
I never told you to trust me. Why would you ?Yes....you know best
Okay... Can Pakistan do in Kashmir what China just did in Ladakh?... IM JUST GIVING INDIA MORE CHANCES TO "WIN".
So Pravin criticizes a lot of what India did or did not do over the years. I can understand that.
What I do not understand is his definition of "kinetic" warfare and the other buzz terms he uses glowingly of the Chinese.
Can anyone intelligent enough and militarily savvy provide some input on this?
Most Indians will want to keep their head down in the sand, deny and go by Modi's fabricated political deception. Watch Pravin Sawhney, an Indian defence analyst unmask misery of India and reveal who is actually at fault in Ladakh.
Published on 1 Jun 2020
Example
Suppose you wish to deprive an enemy of recon satellite advantages in a battlefield
Kinetic means - using a ASAT missile to completely destroy the satellite
non-Kinetic means - cyber attack on the satellite ground communications such that it loses communications with the satellite permanently
The first thing to note is, The Dispute is BETWEEN > BHUTAN & CHINA. Period.
And what happned next was this :
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-42834609
Regarding the ROAD :
https://warontherocks.com/2018/06/doklam-one-year-later-chinas-long-game-in-the-himalayas/
China may have backed down last year because local PLA units were caught off guard by India’s rapid response and because Xi Jinping did not wish to face a diplomatic fiasco months before his leadership tenure was to be renewed at the 19th Party Congress.
Rather than escalating the Doklam dispute, which may have forced India to respond more aggressively and galvanized the United States or others to step up in support, China shrewdly backed off and resumed its activities only when the international media glare had subsided, and in a way that minimized India’s concern about losing the high ground.
View attachment 637335
Depends on results of Bhutan's stance on ChinaCool! Thanks for the education.
Ok cool. But don't you think that China ultimately got what it wanted?
they are deploying artillery right next to the strategic road . what do india do ?Wrong Summary/Conculsion ( By You ).
Proof : Doklam ,2017.
Read & Educate of what INDIA DID : https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/doklam-who-won
which says :
Unless China brings back the bulldozers soon, India will have won this round.
Which INDIA DID.
Pravin Sawhney said in one of his earlier videos that one of India's biggest mistakes on LOC was that Pakistan fooled India into accepting LOC as border instead of a boundary when India decided to build a fence, so now India focuses on defending its fence instead of going offensively to capture Azad Kashmir, since they psychologically restricted themselves from going further by building a fence.
It looks like India is going to make the same mistake again and get played by Chinese this time.
I think India will be comfortable making the LOC a permanent border.