What's new

India Likely To Acquire Tu-22M3 Supersonic Bombers

Not required for Navy. These are maintenance extensive. If you buy 4 then at any given time only 2 will be available. Plus 4 is a very small number for the same reason.
 
But now we need long range bombers. With the chinese threat, the entire IOR and SCS should be in our range. Granted 10 years back it was not needed, but in the next 10 years, we will surely need it. Time to consider purchase...
 
Won't be bad for IOR region. packed with 12-16 cruise missiles and 6000+ km range, It can map IOR with fire power.
Their 6000+ Km range means nothing as no aircraft in Indian inventory can provide fighter escort for these antique beasts, and they will be easy kill for the carrier based aircraft on their own. It is one thing to bomb Syrian rebels, but I don't think these are still capable to take on a modern Navy with fighter escorts.

With the current Chinese Navy, perhaps the only possible threat will be their submarines and for that India is inducting Poseidons, so why invest in this old junk.
 
4 TU-22s.....against a combined fkeet of over 150+ H-6....seems any dhakkan can become a journalist in India these days.
Only genius like you will counter a bomber with another bomber . No wonder I saw people are arguing like a beast over India's purchase of s400 by saying how series sams,PDF mods should ban these type of extra brilliant people.
 
IMG_3181.JPG


IMG_3182.JPG
 
Their 6000+ Km range means nothing as no aircraft in Indian inventory can provide fighter escort for these antique beasts, and they will be easy kill for the carrier based aircraft on their own. It is one thing to bomb Syrian rebels, but I don't think these are still capable to take on a modern Navy with fighter escorts.

With the current Chinese Navy, perhaps the only possible threat will be their submarines and for that India is inducting Poseidons, so why invest in this old junk.
Thats purely depends on how and where one use it. If I am talking about IOR, I am talking from position of strength as we'll have our 2-3 aircraft carriers roaming in this very region and many strategic air force and naval bases on various islands in the middle of seas. It make sense then. Its ability to carry a huge number of long range cruise missiles is what interests me....
 
Only genius like you will counter a bomber with another bomber . No wonder I saw people are arguing like a beast over India's purchase of s400 by saying how series sams,PDF mods should ban these type of extra brilliant people.

Never claimed to be one, nor did i claim a head to head confrontation as a means of countering. Simply pointing out the fallacy of the journalist claiming that 4 are enough to deter China, when they have the means and numbers to deliver a saturation attack. If India loses one, that's an entire quarter of her strategic bomber fleet, if china does, it's a mild irritance.

If my questioning the journalist's sensationalist claims warrants your sarcasm, then so be it.
 
Waste of money.
On what basis? AFAIK IN is the only armed forces in India who spend resources wisely. So if they wanted this platform,means it will definitely will be having a key role to play in IN's operational environment.
 
On what basis? AFAIK IN is the only armed forces in India who spend resources wisely. So if they wanted this platform,means it will definitely will be having a key role to play in IN's operational environment.
beggrs are not choosrs. indian navy not having free mony. all mony is from poor people. farmers. so not for wasting.


this plan is old and only 2nd hand so don't buy this junk plan.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom