AfrazulMandal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2018
- Messages
- 3,289
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
We can name it whatever we want. Hindus won't be there to see it though. Pity.Can we name it the jolly green mummad ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We can name it whatever we want. Hindus won't be there to see it though. Pity.Can we name it the jolly green mummad ?
Yeah. Hind/Hindustan may have a corrupting influence on the next generations.
Islamistan sounds good. But the remaining Hindu names of places also need to be changed for good.
Mathura, Vrindavan, blah blah. Aurangzeb did that long back, but Shivajis and etc took them back later. This should be prevented.
It should be Istanbuled. Name changes need to be made permanent.
We can name it whatever we want. Hindus won't be there to see it though. Pity.
Aurangzeb did that mistake.Nah they can stay so long as they obey the law.
Aurangzeb did that mistake.
But sure, 2 to 3% is fine. Like in Pakistan. Anything more is a corrupting influence on society.
And the temples - they should be converted or made into offices, museums or something else.
Exactly. Wish we could see it in our lifetimes. When the saffron and other flags are gone and only the crescent flies again.Anyway, judging by our birth-rates and conversion-rates, they should become a minority in the region pretty soon.
Conversions are also necessary. Sindh, Afghanistan etc for instance never rebelled. Hindu areas did.so long as you treat the insurrectionists properly
Exactly. Wish we could see it in our lifetimes. When the saffron and other flags are gone and only the crescent flies again.
Conversions are also necessary. Sindh, Afghanistan etc for instance never rebelled. Hindu areas did.
Conversions are also necessary. Sindh, Afghanistan etc for instance never rebelled. Hindu areas did.
Conversions here don't happen to Islam almost at all. There are very few, a handful. To Christianity there are more, but even they convert temporarily for benefits and revert to Linga worship.Conversions are already occurring rapidly, but Muslims in Hindustan could certainly pick up the pace a little.
Maulanas in Pakistan have converted the Hindu population almost in its entirety.
However, we must remember, we cannot force them, it must be done willingly.
Freeing a slave may need some force.However, we must remember, we cannot force them, it must be done willingly.
we should use the Shahada instead
Conversions here don't happen to Islam almost at all. There are very few, a handful. To Christianity there are more, but even they convert temporarily for benefits and revert to Linga worship.
But Pakistan shows their Hindu population has increased! I always hoped that was fake. Bangladesh is a living example of why it is a risk.
Freeing a slave may need some force.
Yes. Like jizya for instance. Farmers used to convert to avoid paying it.The Hindu population has not increased, it might just be slightly higher than previously estimated.
The "some force" bit is unnecessary, we just need more exposure, and us being in power would give us that.
Yes. Like jizya for instance. Farmers used to convert to avoid paying it.
Hehe. True that.I was always surprised at how much of a coercion jizya was, guess some people are just penny pinchers or need the extra push.
Hehe. True that.
No doubt they preferred no tax to leaving their religion. What would Muslims do in their place? We would fight.
But not Hindus/Buddhists. Ah, well. Their loss.
And those who remained Hindu/Buddhist/Sikh will live to see history repeat while those who converted will reap the benefits. He truly knows best.Some of them fought, but the ones who converted were much smarter and put their petty pride behind them, which is sometimes necessary.
We don't need to do anything, we can literally just let these idiots self-destruct and conquer the place afterwards.