What's new

'India is well-equipped to defend itself against China,' says Sushma Swaraj in Rajya Sabha

First Sikkim issue will be solved then Kashmir will get attention...India can't do anything...

So, thats why China will solve Sikkim issue while we will solve Indian occupied Kashmir :)

Sikkim is of no dispute and the Chinese gave up and accepted it as an Indian territory way long ago.. Now like how you said, Kashmir will be solved on the same line as Sikkim and neither Pakistan nor you master can do anything about it.
 
.
Here is another indian lie exposed

But India and Bhutan do not have a military pact. Their so-called Friendship Treaty (2007) no longer empowers India to guide Bhutan’s foreign policy and merely commits the two countries «to coordinate on issues relating to national interests».

Suffice to say, India has militarily intervened in the China-Bhutan border dispute over Doklam.

Unsurprisingly, China alleges that by doing so, India has violated the 1890 convention. This is a can of worms, because if the 1890 convention is revisited, Sikkim’s settled border with Tibet may also get re-opened – and, alongside, India’s annexation of Sikkim in 1975 too (something which Beijing accepted grudgingly only in 2003 in the context of an improvement in the overall Sino-Indian ties at that time.)
india also violated border defense cooperation agreement 2005 between china & India.

India Violated the Agreement by using Force against Chinese Construction employees rather then Diplomatic Cooperation
 
. .
International backing == bhutan
Delusional Indians think that because Japan and U.S conducted the Naval exercise. it means that both are backing India's stand over Sikkim stand-off, although neither U.S nor Japan stated officially regarding this matter.

India moved troops because of the fear or as usual unwarranted concerns that china can capture India's neck (siliguri corridor).
although siliguri corridor is miles far away from the actual construction of a road. that cant be captured until there wouldn't be full conventional war. because Siliguri Corridor is being protected by difficult terrains, rivers that make sure the safety of both side naturally.

India is saying it is our move to save our sovereignty and that's why Indian chest thumping is going on all over India that India stopped a road construction and saved her sovereignty.

To stop construction of a road and call it saving your sovereignty is totally insanity.

2nd India's biggest misunderstanding about the border defense cooperation agreement 2005 between china & India.
According to Agreement.
"China and India have previously agreed that the disputes must be solved diplomatically. During the visit of the then Chinese premier Wen Jiaboa to India in 2005, Beijing and New Delhi signed a historic accord, agreeing to settle the decades-old border dispute without use of force.

and in 2013 when the then indian Prime Miniter manmohan Singh Visited China, the two states singed the Border Defense Cooperation Agreement, reaffirming that both shall "exercise maximum self-restraint,""not use force or face-offs occur along the disputed areas."​

if you consider this agreement among China-India-Bhutan.. then India Violated the Agreement by using Force against Chinese Construction employees rather then Diplomatic Cooperation, although not a single bullet was fired but by using force, India violated the Agreement with China.

India moved troops on behalf of India's unwarranted Concerns. India didn't have any intention to confront with China just because of Bhutan, it is India's own unwarranted Concerns over Silliguri Corridor.

What Indian Army is doing in that area which dont belong to India at Doklam ? not even Indian claimed Area.

Why are Pakistanis so worked up about India-China conflict ?
 
. . . .
Sikkim is of no dispute and the Chinese gave up and accepted it as an Indian territory way long ago.. Now like how you said, Kashmir will be solved on the same line as Sikkim and neither Pakistan nor you master can do anything about it.


after indian military intervention and violation of 1890 convention, Sikkim no longer settled issue; its reopened now. Now india can try to chew on it.

"Unsurprisingly, China alleges that by doing so, India has violated the 1890 convention. This is a can of worms, because if the 1890 convention is revisited, Sikkim’s settled border with Tibet may also get re-opened – and, alongside, India’s annexation of Sikkim in 1975 too."
 
.
face the truth ? about what ? Chinese being unable to do anything other than giving out warnings ?

Dude, they have graduated from mild warning to serious warnings. Take the serious warnings seriously, they hurt eh.

after indian military intervention, Sikkim issue no longer settled; its reopened now.

So is Tibet issue ;)
 
.
While US is your daddy since 1962 when u asked US to put on the trouser again when China did with you

Your NSA guy is running as if something about to happen within weeks.

U have been exposed and Pakistan took noted it. China will be more aggressive from now on and we will bring them into Kashmir just to irk you.

Chinese have already hinted they are interested in Kashmir on behalf of Pakistan. I beleive Chinese will give you answers on different fronts...Be ready

Pakistanis must be feelking vry fragile their DADDY JI china is beig bullied by INDIA

I BET YOU Did not see THIS happening...

Both PAKITANI & CHINA cannot do anything in KASHMIR infact you cant even get SAICHEN.

ALOT of talk for 70 years but NO CIGAR
 
.
Pakistanis must be feelking vry fragile their DADDY JI china is beig bullied by INDIA

I BET YOU Did not see THIS happening...

Both PAKITANI & CHINA cannot do anything in KASHMIR infact you cant even get SAICHEN.

ALOT of talk for 70 years but NO CIGAR

Check this map closely, Pakistan has almost half of Kashmir between India and Pakistan, if you are not measuring the Chinese occupied part of Kashmir. Of the 220,000 Sq Km of Kahmir total area, Pakistan has 88,000 Sq Kms, India 10,0000 sq kms and China about 37,000 sq kms.

India has less than half of Kashmir all lost to Pakistan in 1948, and Aksai Chin was lost to China...
main-qimg-b35bad2bbb912287c332387683fdb393-c



kashmir_disputed_2003.jpg
 
.
Dude, they have graduated from mild warning to serious warnings. Take the serious warnings seriously, they hurt eh.
So is Tibet issue ;)

india, in reality, never rest on Tibet. It sheltered Dalai and still occupies Arunachal. Nothing changes there. No brownie point for india.
 
. .
Don't worry, we will soon find out. :enjoy:
How soon is Soon?

yeah, I think it's the same guy.
It is the same chap, who thinks he can fight every Indian that he meets....Smuck!

solve kashmir first please.
Yes!..Tell that to your pakistani friends...They need to vacate their so called, Azad Kashmir (Whatever that means), and hand it back to India...thats the only viable solution on the table, now!
 
. .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom