'India is well-equipped to defend itself against China,' says Sushma Swaraj in Rajya Sabha

[Hulk]

China wants to build a road that goes to tri junction. There is nobody from China living there, there is no reason for you to build the road apart from trying to grab land etc. India is right to defend.

solve kashmir first please.

Here comes the real face of the false flagger.

 

[idune]

China wants to build a road that goes to tri junction. There is nobody from China living there, there is no reason for you to build the road apart from trying to grab land etc. India is right to defend.

india has no prerogative to dictate why other sovereign country want to build road and what not, in their territory; period.

 

[gslv mk3]

You freakin quoted the post. That does not quite fit in with definition of "ignore". Now go take a dip in holy Ganga.

Any more BS essays ?

"It is entirely conceivable that Doval will sound out the Chinese side on some face-saving formula that ends the standoff, devolving upon pullback of Indian troops from Chinese territory.

.........

And the plain truth is that the Indian economy will crumble if a war is thrust upon the country.

Because of a clever change in the methodology of calculating gross domestic product, the Indian economy’s growth rate looks impressive, but in actuality, under the combined pressure of the recent policy moves on demonetization and goods and services tax (GST, a unified tax structure for the entire country), an economy that had already been slowing is now virtually crawling."

More BS from another CCP propaganda paper

 

[Hulk]

india has no prerogative to dictate why other sovereign country want to build road and what not, in their territory; period.

India has all right to be concerned if its security is threatened. I do not like to discuss with biased people without any logic so please ignore my post. Who build a road out of your country into someone else's country without an ulterior motive. There is zero reason for them to build a road there.

 

[idune]

Indian lie exposed by indian diplomats and army generals.
------------------------------------------------------------------

China probably widening road in Doklam
Meanwhile, there is much greater clarity about what really happened on the ground.

First, contrary to what India media claimed, there has been no Chinese ‘intrusion’ on to India’s sacred soil. On the contrary, Indian military moved into Doklam on the China-Bhutan border, which has been under Chinese control all along.

Second, reports projected that a standoff ensued as China started building a road in Doklam. But there is evidence now that a road was already in existence for over a decade at least and China was probably widening it.

Third, India claimed that its intervention was at the request of Bhutan. China disputed the claim. Significantly, after a visit to Thimphu by the spouse of the Chinese ambassador in Delhi and her meeting with the Bhutanese king last week, Beijing maintains that Bhutan did not seek Indian military intervention.

Fourth, and most importantly, China maintains that it is within its sovereign right to build roads in an area under its control. Whereas, Indian reports sensed a ‘mission creep’ with a hidden Chinese agenda to eventually threaten the Siliguri corridor, a hundred kilometers to the south, which connects India’s restive northeast with the hinterland.

http://www.atimes.com/article/indian-military-standoff-china-bhutan/

 

[gslv mk3]

^^ funny to jamati jumping up & down over an article written by a well known commie...

 

[idune]

India has all right to be concerned if its security is threatened.

nearly 3/4 of century long independence, indians did not learn to come out of low and insecure mentality. If others doing things that india deem threatening, india is free to take counter measure within its own border. india has no right to invade other country territory and then lie and chest thump about it. Now indians are looking for face savings retreat. That is utter shame for india as a nation.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Any more BS essays ?

No. You don't have the brains to understand them. Mind you I suspect you can see okay. There is no danger of India fighting China. Can guarantee that. Only time India will pick a fight is if it has at least 6 to 1 advantage. Since China/India face off is a equal 1 on 1 there is no danger of India fighting.

 

[Hulk]

Indian lie exposed by indian diplomats and army generals.
------------------------------------------------------------------

China probably widening road in Doklam
Meanwhile, there is much greater clarity about what really happened on the ground.

First, contrary to what India media claimed, there has been no Chinese ‘intrusion’ on to India’s sacred soil. On the contrary, Indian military moved into Doklam on the China-Bhutan border, which has been under Chinese control all along.

Second, reports projected that a standoff ensued as China started building a road in Doklam. But there is evidence now that a road was already in existence for over a decade at least and China was probably widening it.

Third, India claimed that its intervention was at the request of Bhutan. China disputed the claim. Significantly, after a visit to Thimphu by the spouse of the Chinese ambassador in Delhi and her meeting with the Bhutanese king last week, Beijing maintains that Bhutan did not seek Indian military intervention.

Fourth, and most importantly, China maintains that it is within its sovereign right to build roads in an area under its control. Whereas, Indian reports sensed a ‘mission creep’ with a hidden Chinese agenda to eventually threaten the Siliguri corridor, a hundred kilometers to the south, which connects India’s restive northeast with the hinterland.

http://www.atimes.com/article/indian-military-standoff-china-bhutan/

Y

nearly 3/4 of century long independence, indians did not learn to come out of low and insecure mentality. If others doing things that india deem threatening, india is free to take counter measure within its own border. india has no right to invade other country territory and then lie and chest thump about it. Now indians are looking for face savings retreat. That is utter shame for india as a nation.

If you are really a BD citizen it is rich coming from you. Maybe we should have heard your advice in 1971 and allowed your ancesors the treatment they were getting. I can clearly see you leanings and I can understand it does not matter to you if someone rapes you as long as he is a jehadi. low life idiot.

 

[idune]

^^ funny to jamati jumping up & down over an article written by a well known commie...

That's right, jammati's are putting you indians in the right spot to face the truth and reality and enjoying your hair pulling.

 

[gslv mk3]

india has no right to invade other country territory and then lie and chest thump about it.

We have a friendship treaty with Bhutan, doofus.

That's right jammati's are putting you indians in the right spot to face the truth and reality and enjoying your

face the truth ? about what ? Chinese being unable to do anything other than giving out warnings ?

No. You don't have the brains to understand them. Mind you I suspect you can see okay. There is no danger of India fighting China. Can guarantee that. Only time India will pick a fight is if it has at least 6 to 1 advantage. Since China/India face off is a equal 1 on 1 there is no danger of India fighting.

Anything more to say ?

 

[shahbaz baig]

India has all right to be concerned if its security is threatened. I do not like to discuss with biased people without any logic so please ignore my post. Who build a road out of your country into someone else's country without an ulterior motive. There is zero reason for them to build a road there.

International backing == bhutan
Delusional Indians think that because Japan and U.S conducted the Naval exercise. it means that both are backing India's stand over Sikkim stand-off, although neither U.S nor Japan stated officially regarding this matter.

India moved troops because of the fear or as usual unwarranted concerns that china can capture India's neck (siliguri corridor).

you can see silliguri Corridor in map but Chinese construction of a road was being built in Chumbl valley this Chinese territory

although siliguri corridor is miles far away from the actual construction of a road. that cant be captured until there wouldn't be full conventional war. because Siliguri Corridor is being protected by difficult terrains, rivers that make sure the safety of both side naturally.

India is saying it is our move to save our sovereignty and that's why Indian chest thumping is going on all over India that India stopped a road construction and saved her sovereignty.

To stop construction of a road and call it saving your sovereignty is totally insanity.

2nd India's biggest misunderstanding about the border defense cooperation agreement 2005 between china & India.
According to Agreement.

"China and India have previously agreed that the disputes must be solved diplomatically. During the visit of the then Chinese premier Wen Jiaboa to India in 2005, Beijing and New Delhi signed a historic accord, agreeing to settle the decades-old border dispute without use of force.

and in 2013 when the then indian Prime Miniter manmohan Singh Visited China, the two states singed the Border Defense Cooperation Agreement, reaffirming that both shall "exercise maximum self-restraint,""not use force or face-offs occur along the disputed areas."​

if you consider this agreement among China-India-Bhutan.. then India Violated the Agreement by using Force against Chinese Construction employees rather then Diplomatic Cooperation, although not a single bullet was fired but by using force, India violated the Agreement with China.

India moved troops on behalf of India's unwarranted Concerns. India didn't have any intention to confront with China just because of Bhutan, it is India's own unwarranted Concerns over Silliguri Corridor.

What Indian Army is doing in that area which dont belong to India at Doklam ? not even Indian claimed Area.

 

[idune]

We have a friendship treaty with Bhutan, doofus.

Here is another indian lie exposed

But India and Bhutan do not have a military pact. Their so-called Friendship Treaty (2007) no longer empowers India to guide Bhutan’s foreign policy and merely commits the two countries «to coordinate on issues relating to national interests».

Suffice to say, India has militarily intervened in the China-Bhutan border dispute over Doklam.

Unsurprisingly, China alleges that by doing so, India has violated the 1890 convention. This is a can of worms, because if the 1890 convention is revisited, Sikkim’s settled border with Tibet may also get re-opened – and, alongside, India’s annexation of Sikkim in 1975 too (something which Beijing accepted grudgingly only in 2003 in the context of an improvement in the overall Sino-Indian ties at that time.)

 

[gslv mk3]

Their so-called Friendship Treaty (2007) no longer empowers India to guide Bhutan’s foreign policy and merely commits the two countries «to coordinate on issues relating to national interests».

cry about it then....

 

[illusion8]

cry about it then....

Truth be told...the commies and their slaves can't do jack other than sing praises about their master for no reason at all...pathetic.