India is no match for China in the SAARC summit

[Jai_Hind]

Pakistan, Nepal and Sri Lanka will be keen to see PRC hop onboard.

the organization itself seems to have started on a bad foot and is hardly effective to this day....take Pakistan for example - our largest trading partners are US, EU markets, Middle East/Persian Gulf and of course China. Our trade in Central/South Asia is much smaller in comparison. Hope that changes - we will need to see the rise of the new SIlk Route in order to realize major benefits

SAARC are countries with a common history and background.... more then business it was found to rediscover the understanding we once shared, though people may think it had acheived zilch, bringing in China is going to discard the purpose of SAARC...

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

SAARC are countries with a common history and background.... more then business it was found to rediscover the understanding we once shared, though people may think it had acheived zilch, bringing in China is going to discard the purpose of SAARC...

we're trying to have a serious conversation here man, try hard to keep it somewhat serious

who is "we" anyways in YOUR definition....let me guess. "We" are hindus but not "in the religious sense" right? I've heard that line from you guys before. Is that it?

 

[Jai_Hind]

we're trying to have a serious conversation here man, try hard to keep it somewhat serious

who is "we" anyways in YOUR definition

Serious conversations doesnt have such lame titles and posts...

And "we" stands for South Asia, the part which once co-existed peacefully....

 

[angeldude13]

Lots of Anti India chinis on this thread.
There are lots of false flag cheenis too.
Are they ashamed to put there real flag on??

 

[dray]

South Tibet is currently in south Asia. Aksai Chin is our foot in the door.

There is no such place called South Tibet, and that door of Aksai Chin is an illegal one and will be taken back.

 

[Agent Smith]

SAARC has been a non-achiever and the 18th SAARC summit in Kathmandu was no exception. Given SAARC’s record, no one expected substantive outcomes at this summit either. Hence, lack of tangible results is neither surprising nor disappointing. No one expected Modi to fire up SAARC or turn it into a star performer. Thus, claims that this SAARC summit was a “success” because it was a “successful outing” for Modi, because he occupied centre stage in Kathmandu, because he set the tone, because he was one up on Sharif, because …, because …, only serve to emphasise the opposite.

SAARC has not been a life-changing force in South Asia. This does not mean that it is useless or should be wound up. It is as useful or useless as the UN, or, for that matter any other regional or international forum.

BRICS also is a non achiever and sois the UN, so?

 

[Agent Smith]

There were no India before 1947 as well.

India has been there since Gupt era and included present day afganistan, pakistan and ceylon. work on your history genius. read something about Chandragupt Vikramaditya.

 

[Agent Smith]

At that time, this Ashoka didn't call himself Indian, he had no clue what India will likely be in the future time..

yes he called himself Bharatiya. Bharat, Aryavrat, India, all are names of a single country you fool

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Serious conversations doesnt have such lame titles and posts...

And "we" stands for South Asia, the part which once co-existed peacefully....

fair enough......co-existance - that's debatable. Sub-continental problem. We cant stand eachother

Their was no Pakistan before 1947 so should first read history. Most of the part those ruled by those arab and turkey are now muslim counties.

hate to burst your bubble but there was no "india" before 1947 either

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Is america also want to be a member of SAARC?

they dont need to.....all it takes is a phone call from US embassy they manage to get "favours" done

China border with many members states in SAARC. Therefore the idea of China entry to SAARC not so outlandish.

im surprised by the EXTENT of indian opposition.....india trades more volume with China than it does with its combined trade with all other members

 

[Bong]

Already we have problems with India Pak. Inclusion of China will create another problem of India China.
SAARC should go for Eastern countries like Myanmar's membership. China can stay as a good observer.
Or a SAARC+China is possible. China is already connected with us by BCIM

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Already we have problems with India Pak. Inclusion of China will create another problem of India China.
SAARC should go for Eastern countries like Myanmar's membership. China can stay as a good observer.
Or a SAARC+China is possible. China is already connected with us by BCIM

another option/alternative.....until burma stops its pogroms on rohingyas they dont really have my backing but that's just me personally

 

[Bong]

another option/alternative.....until burma stops its pogroms on rohingyas they dont really have my backing but that's just me personally

Well Burmans aren't mentally improved we should give them chances to mix with diverse world

 

[Steakhouse]

Well Burmans aren't mentally improved we should give them chances to mix with diverse world

Indian said the creation of Bangladesh because India ruled over the subcontinent and India as a nation was formed before the British set feet on the South Asia subcontinent. Do you agree with this statement?

 

[Bong]

Indian said the creation of Bangladesh because India ruled over the subcontinent and India as a nation was formed before the British set feet on the South Asia subcontinent. Do you agree with this statement?

Modern India and the India was before had many differences. Where one nations defeated others and ruled them. Also the foreign invaders always invaded here and became native people. This India was never here.Todays India is formed by many countries like Maratha, Rajputana, Hyderabad etc. BD is also an Indian country just not joined the Indian union. There are other Indian country like Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan which are Independent. India is a continent like Europe. Todays Indian shape taken mostly by British rule. If British and Muslims were never here. We could see dozens of small countries here. India is a historical name to identify this area of world by outsiders like Bharat, Hindustan.