What's new

India is mother country of Bangladesh says Awami League leader Hanif

Bangladesh should be in the indian union. The name can be east-bengal or awami pradesh. May be then India would allow parliamentary elections in BD.
 
.
That is debatable.....It was the same landmass but under different rules by different rulers at different times....the British were probably the first who actually covered every single inch of what is now Bangladesh Pakistan and India. I do not think the countries that were a part of the Mongol empire actually say they were one country once.

Probably nation is a better word for him to use than country. It still somewhat broadly applies to this day even with the separate political realms.

The mauryas were pretty close to uniting the whole landmass too, what they didnt have in the south, they made up for in afghanistan and burma.
 
. .
Bangladesh should be in the indian union. The name can be east-bengal or awami pradesh. May be then India would allow parliamentary elections in BD.

We dont want you in the union. You were the original proponents of 2 nation theory and you had to slowly and finally realise it wasn't the brightest of ideas to base it on religion above all things. you can enjoy being remote controlled by the original baddie for a good long time..since you needed the original baddie's help to rescue you from the abusive master you found yourself entangled with.

We are not done extracting the repayment...and wont be for a very long time. Take it as a humbling lesson.
 
. . . .
Bangladesh should be in the indian union. The name can be east-bengal or awami pradesh. May be then India would allow parliamentary elections in BD.
Well, then it's just going to be "baar baar Modi Sarkar" then.
 
.
you had to slowly and finally realise it wasn't the brightest of ideas to base it on religion above all things

You have to consider how the Muslims of Bengal suffered under the two parallel oppression. One by British overlords and their protege Hindu Zamindars and gentiles. When the Muslim leaders of Bengal convinced the British to form a separate East Bengal-Assam Province, the elite Hindus undid it.

The result was the formation of All-India Muslim League in Dhaka in 1910. This ML went to the forefront of then politics and separated Pakistan from the mainland India. The Hindu oppression was responsible for the growth of insecurity and insularity of the Muslims of Bengal at that period. You have to blame the Babu Bangalis for this.
 
.
You have to consider how the Muslims of Bengal suffered under the two parallel oppression. One by British overlords and their protege Hindu Zamindars and gentiles. When the Muslim leaders of Bengal convinced the British to form a separate East Bengal-Assam Province, the elite Hindus undid it.

The result was the formation of All-India Muslim League in Dhaka in 1910. This ML went to the forefront of then politics and separated Pakistan from the mainland India. The Hindu oppression was responsible for the growth of insecurity and insularity of the Muslims of Bengal at that period. You have to blame the Babu Bangalis for this.

See you guys made it a Hindu Zamindar thing instead of just Zamindar thing like in rest of India.

Anyway you reaped what you sowed by making it a religion based thing...and you now have the current situation that you have to live with the legacy where your original ideological enemy was the one that played a big role in you extricating yourself from religion based nationhood with an abusive overlord.

It will take a long time for things to be level and square till we trust Bangladeshis to run their politics totally independently inside or outside Indian union....I mean just look at the large numbers of remnants of the previous destructive ideology still present in your national fabric.
 
.
See you guys made it a Hindu Zamindar thing instead of just Zamindar thing like in rest of India.

It was the ground reality. Brits handed over all the lands to the their hindu boot lickers in Bengal. Muslim became landless beggars within days.
 
.
It was the ground reality. Brits handed over all the lands to the their hindu boot lickers in Bengal. Muslim became landless beggars within days.

So why identify this on religion lines? Strive for united independence and then create the reforms with the political power you have.

You went more reactionary, thus you eventually get 3 million butchered by your co-founders of same religion based miles away.

What a stupid concept for a country.

Now you are cut down to size and politically dominated by dada because of the mistrust stemming from what you did....and that you yourselves still enjoy in perpetuating to large degree.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom