What's new

India Is Building a Top-Secret Nuclear City to Produce Thermonuclear Weapons, Experts Say

. .
Not the same proof that the indians provided before May 1998 that Pakistan has absolutely no nuclear weapons and can never possess them. If Pakistan did provide evidence of it's h-bomb and thermonuclear weapons capability or it's long range missile capability than it's economy would be destroyed by the west. Take a hint, why the sudden and intense pressure by the americans to halt Pakistan's nuclear and missile programs? Why didn't india attack Pakistan in 2002 or 2008 even when the americans were indirectly encouraging the indians to do so? Even when india's military is supposed to be 10x more powerful than Pakistan's.

One hypothesis.

Because most probably, India was the only country not really affected by any economic crisis as such. And a war with Pakistan would have destroyed Indian economy growth for long.

Headly a potential cia operative might have been involved to create war situation b/w India and Pakistan, that would help the US to supply more arms and create an economic zone for them.

Right time analysis by our agencies gave red signals to any pre-emptive strikes on Pakistan which would have led to war. Otherwise, India would have gone ahead with the air raids. Irrespective of any fear of nuclear war as we did in 1999 and 2003. More over in 2008, we had our ABM system already tested.
 
. .
There is no where in India that can have its own Groom Lake aka Area 51?
We can cite the National Security and Official Secrets Act and keep the pesky intruders out.
Afaik, There are some bases which is out of bounds for Civilians or anyone nor do anyone know they exist.
My uncle was a Scientist in the group which oversaw the 1999 Pokhran Nuclear bomb blasts.Other than that i can't divulge much.
Making Lake is not a big deal, it might be preferable to make it in some Isolated Island.
 
Last edited:
.
So are you expecting more from that place????
Nope, an AB, involvement of ISRO & DRDO is just for fun, in a case when Nuclear Program is totally under DAE.

Definitely you need 10,000 acre facility for Thermonuclear Bomb R&D, BARC is useless in this matter.

BTW, how many facilities you have seen of 10,000 acre that dedicated to thermonuclear bomb.

Maybe India is bitten by mad dog that creating such large facility for Thermonuclear weapon, when work can be done in 5 acre.
 
Last edited:
.

Exactly, "IF". The most difficult part for Pakistan was becoming a nuclear weapons state. That has been achieved. Now, nearly 18 years after reaching that milestone Pakistan has the capability to produce h-bombs and thermonuclear weapons and that should come as no surprise and from Pakistan's POV, a logical step. The above link from 2011 in my previous post supports this. Saying Pakistan cannot produce thermonuclear weapons or h-bombs is as ridiculous and laughable as indian claims from 1998 saying Pakistan does not and can never ever have nuclear weapons capability.
 
Last edited:
. . . . . . . .
adding 20 bombs a year vs 5 bombs of india and still its not enough for you???will you be able to fire all your nukes???bajipala ho jayega tum log ka, soch agar ek missile ne bhi mal function toh???and you dont have thermonuclear bombs....
Hey number have to be normalised as per enemy territory. But I hope we both have never to use any of them ....not even a single one and if you want to know about its destruction.?.. ask any Japanese. Losses will be astronomically high due to very high population densities and also much more powerful bombs than little boy and fat man.
But Pakistan has to have sufficient number of nukes of all types with all options of fsd and multiple strike capabilities so that a criminal minded fanatic prime minister in our enemy country should not even be able to think about a war.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom