India History : Myth of 1000 Years of Mulsim Rule

[Secret Service]

lol i know people blind love for zahid hamid.....
in front of him all are traitors.....

well, dr r many like u [e.g @nline (see dr signatures n dr comments,all r full of conspiracies]

and one last thing..

"also" n not "aslo" [i know how excited n in hurry u r]

@nline is an indian with false flags...just read his posts....
i dont care about your hindu mentality and i love zaid hamid atleast he is good at some thing....

 

[KS]

If you haven't studied history, you have absolutely no idea what a disservice you are doing to the Mughals - They defied the Shah of Iran because they considered themselves Indians. To help with the religious harmony, Jalluddin Akbar not only married Hindu women, he also changed his religion (He was not a Muslim, if you are wondering)...

I completely agree with your feelings but then what is wrong in showing the history as it was and not just going by myths. ?

And I cant stop laughing at the bolded part - he married Rajput women to help promote harmony ?!?!? He married them so that the Rajputs who were good warriors will not fight against him ans would serve in the Mughal Army as Generals. For example when he married Jodha bhai he made sure her nephew Man Singh became his general.

So please stop here, and show the Pakistanis how much pride you take in those Muslim rulers who, with their tolerance, completely changed the definition of 'rule'! Yes, there have been atrocities, but the majority of the rulers were great! And most importantly, they identified themselves as Indians!!! Hindustani !!! Why do you think other Muslim rulers in the West used to say, "Hindustan na jaana, wahan paanv rakhte hi khoon kharab ho jaata hai".

No wonder these words are coming from Romila Thapar the BSing Commie historian. And I absolutely have no pride whatsoever in that rule.Their rule only exposed how disunited we Indians were for some nomadic Central Asians to come and rule us for 5 centuries.

And majority were great ?? Except Akbar no one even qualifies for that title in a remote manner.

Please think. None of this is a lie, I am quoting Romila Thapar and Hari Sen here![/QUOTE]

 

[Yeti]

I prefered "who coined the term hindu or hinduism". and it seems its fairly a modern term. probably the term came with the british just like nationalism came with them, and the term hindu is not even a generally accepted term...

Hindu comes from persia for those living beyond the river Indus they got the spelling wrong from sind which became 'hind' hence the word 'hindus' which is a geographic word


The word Hindu is the Persian name of the Indus River (Sanskrit Sindhu) in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent. The Persian term was further loaned into Arabic as al-Hind referring to the land of the people who live across river Indus, and into Greek as Indos, whence ultimately English India. By the 13th century, Hindustān emerged as a popular alternative name of India, meaning the "land of Hindus".

 

[Joe Shearer]

defeating later is one thing and Muslim outsiders attacking the un-unified states and then ruling over the natives is another thing which you cant deny it happened for sure

Oh dear, the memsahib really isn't amused. Lay off, Kartic, and show her a good example: don't get your knickers in a twist.

 

[blackops]

who cares if they did they were killed by a single lady rani durgavati sadly she killed herself when her horse didnt crossed the lake as it was a new horse but somehow her army came to know about this who were sitting in mandla they surrounded mughals and killed them no muslim rulers were able to command my area only a nawab came in bhopal as he was a manager of raja bhoj who did not had any children

 

[blackops]

she was one of the bravest women of india all my respect for her

 

[Yeti]

Are women are still brave today

 

[blackops]

Are women are still brave today

yes they are were and will be

 

[Manas]

 

[kavish]

@nline is an indian with false flags...just read his posts....
i dont care about your hindu mentality and i love zaid hamid atleast he is good at some thing....

stunned... 4 ur people's love for Zaid "sir"
actually, idol

even gaddafi is stunned :

BTW, what are those "some" good thing.....???

 

[kavish]

IMHO, he should not say such things now, bcz india is a secular country...
he could do protest etc...against UPA.. but shouldn't rant history..... [yes sivaji etc. were our gr8 fighters]

so,he is 40% ok!! according to me

 

[Gentle Typhoon]

But was it worth it?

Invaders came, some of them extremist, some peaceful, some prosperous and not so rigid. Intention was not bad, to spread teachings of Islam. Then why give up after 500yrs. This was same land for which ancestors sacrificed lives to educate non believers. Why ask for seperate country? What was need for Islamic republic? Why you guys didnt cared to show light of spirituality to me? I can safely say to Allah that your believers didnt followed your advise instead went political route, it was not my fault that I remained non-believer.

 

[divya]

Invaders came and we stood so divided being a maratha, punjabi, south indian and they ruled us as if it was not bound to happen.

didint this lay down the foundation of the modern India where we the same marathas, punjabis, south indians live together to give and take away life for the same nation where the same forefathers lived. we have already learned our lessons. As for the enemies they tried multiple times over the modern India to repeat the same history ended up defending their own territory or lossing some..

Moral of the story: UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL. Long live mother India

 

[Yeti]

India has alway been a prize for outsiders with the fertile plains it is no wonder all armies had their eye on the tonnes of gold we had.

 

[GodlessBastard]

This is a complete non-issue.

Nearly all the Muslim rulers that invaded India became Indianized in the end, just like the Mongols and Manchus that invaded China became Sinicized.

India's greatest attribute throughout history was its ability to absorb foreign rulers and cultures, and make them part of Indian civilization as a whole.

That is why, in my opinion, India was never truly "conquered". Our culture and civilization was never wiped out, and it endures to this day.

As an example, compare this to Egypt. Native Egyptian civilization was completely displaced, first by Greco-Roman civilization and then by Islamic civilization. No one in Egypt writes in hieroglyhs anymore and no one worships Set and Osiris anymore. But people in India still follow dharmic religions and speak Sanskrit and Sanskrit-based languages, as Indians did 2,000 years ago as well.