Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Post starter, you cant even spell Muslim correctly
the mostly accepted figure is 700 years. but again thanks that you accept atleast 500 years' rule by outsider Muslims on India .
anyway so whats the point by proving it wrong??? the expansionist movements had always been aimed at expanding area of rule
@Post starter, you cant even spell Muslim correctly
Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years aswel but nobody knows whats itching you guys so badly
And you can't spell 'can't'
Next time go find a valid point.
When did bursting a myth become itching. If at all I can see only Pakistani posters typing this "1000 year rule" at the drop of a hat.
Whats the difference if we were ruled by muslims for even 5000 years? They had benevolent leaders like Akbar too. (And yes... A$$holes like aurangzeb)
Akbar or Aurangzeb the result was the same foreign rule over the area.
and yeh whats the use of denying history of even talking about it
Didnt I ask for the timeline ?
I had heard so many times from some experts in Pakistan as they talk on TV with lot of pride that they (muslim) ruled "indians" for 1000 years.Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years aswel but nobody knows whats itching you guys so badly