What's new

India hesitant over China, but not hostile despite US influence

Status
Not open for further replies.
India never occupied any other's land illegally in its history of 1000 years , Always others have invaded india.And as far as kasmir conflict kasmir is legal part of india .For more reference go to wikipedia.:) :india:
India is in illegal occupation of south tibet and J&K. for reference see google maps it shows it disputed region.

They may stand tall or even stand on top of hill for all I care.. As long as they carry an Indian passport and pay taxes to Indian establishment, all pakistanis like you can do is suck on the lemon life has thrown at you in this respect ;)

And you can suck on dossier papers while cribbing about 26/11
 
. . .
India has maoists problem ..why...coz people dont even get the food....but pakistan has no such problems. as for statistics it can be used to further ones own aim.

Now, just like your knowledge on Hinduism, you have no clue on Maoists or their ideologies.
 
.
Internal dissent and external Wars are different to separate in Pakistan, but in India, those 2 are totally separate.. Just speaking nonsense does not make it right girl...
War is war be it internal,external or proxy.by the way pak is also fighting internal proxy war.
 
.
You guys have lived on Hindu Growth Rate for most of your independent life. It is just about a decade ago that you have started gaining a bit of money. The result is like upstarts jumping up and down. The Indian rupee fell and gained a bit, the economy fell to just over 5%, and may take a bit of time to regain if at all.

Funnily enough we managed to gain more in that last decade than what Pakistan did in all of its independent life.. That's why India's per capita GDP has long surpassed Pakistan's
 
.
you realise status-quo is beneficial for us. why would we bother you lot when you are doing an impeccable job at ruining the country.
as you earlier mentioned, all india needs to do is provide funds via afghanistan. pakistanis will do the rest.

things have turned out rather well for us vis-a-vis pakistan. there is no frustration on this end.

Your format of status quo is certainly beneficial for you, if it can be called as a status quo.

In my opinion, India is not a status-quo power. It is a regional hegemon. It invaded and captured Junagarh and Manavadar in 1947, invaded and captured Indian Occupied Kashmir in 1947, invaded and captured Hyderabad in 1948, invaded and captured Goa in 1961 which was an area belonging to Portugal, invaded East Pakistan in 1971, captured certain locations in Chorbatla in Kashmir in 1972, invaded and captured Sikkim as late as 1975, invaded and captured some portions of Siachen in 1984, captured certain locations in Qamar Sector in Kashmir in 1988, created Sri Lankan terrorist group LTTE and later invaded Sri Lanka in 1988 till the President of Sri Lanka had to openly ask the Indians to leave, invaded Maldives in 1988 and has continually interfered in internal affairs of Nepal and Bhutan and has spread state sponsored terrorism in all her neighbouring states including Pakistan.
 
.
India is one of the biggest spenders on arming itself. Fools as per your acknowledgement.

India's military spending as a percent of GDP is lower than that of Pakistan

No Pakistan is not a strong country, but, yes, it has nukes. The nukes that are giving the world a big headache

A gun in the hands of a policeman is very different from the gun in the hands of a local goon ;)
 
.
Well, if you go by what most Pakistani members here believe, India is attacking Pakistan everyday in Balochistan, KP and Karachi...
Thats what i said powerful enough to deter your indirect and direct wars and reply in attack.



Your reference to Krishna is as warped as is the logic of those Muslims who take out Fatwas to kill people for making a movie...
You mean to say krishna gave arjun a long fatwa in the form of geeta to fight...........shabash................:rofl:
 
.
Your format of status quo is certainly beneficial for you, if it can be called as a status quo.

In my opinion, India is not a status-quo power. It is a regional hegemon. It invaded and captured Junagarh and Manavadar in 1947, invaded and captured Indian Occupied Kashmir in 1947, invaded and captured Hyderabad in 1948, invaded and captured Goa in 1961 which was an area belonging to Portugal, invaded East Pakistan in 1971, captured certain locations in Chorbatla in Kashmir in 1972, invaded and captured Sikkim as late as 1975, invaded and captured some portions of Siachen in 1984, captured certain locations in Qamar Sector in Kashmir in 1988, created Sri Lankan terrorist group LTTE and later invaded Sri Lanka in 1988 till the President of Sri Lanka had to openly ask the Indians to leave, invaded Maldives in 1988 and has continually interfered in internal affairs of Nepal and Bhutan and has spread state sponsored terrorism in all her neighbouring states including Pakistan.

How could India do all that without being any significant power?

The facts are twisted like your twisted history, can you please come up with something better?
 
. . .
Funnily enough we managed to gain more in that last decade than what Pakistan did in all of its independent life.. That's why India's per capita GDP has long surpassed Pakistan's

Yeah you did surpass it once in history and that too only some years ago and are jumping up and down.

We will restore the status quo.
 
.
The way you paint the picture, Pakistan should have fallen flat a long time ago.

Even 2 billion dollars are peanuts for a country like Pakistan.

But it still hasn't fallen - I wonder why.

Neighbors of an unsafe tall building do not let it fall so as to avoid damage to the near by buildings.. Experts are called in to engineer an implosion so that the building collapses internally without damaging the surroundings.. That takes planning and time ;)
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom