Just look around, one knows that Indians can not be trusted.
History proves that the only long-lasting stable realtionship one has with India has been Master-Slave relationship: India historically has been repeatedly invaded and ruled by almost everyone around.
Acturally the fact that India has no single friend in the region is another proof that Master-Slave relationship is a must in dealing with India .
What this shows is in fact to display your own sense of
insecurity and a contempt for yourself, Speeder. Substitute the word
India with
China everywhere in your rant above and many around the world will nod - just as eagerly.
I think realistically, the "lesson" of 1962 are still evolving. India and China are both plagued by immense problems and these problems manifest externally as a tremendous sense of self-doubt and a need to
compensate - in actions and by words.
In the short term - nothing much I am afraid is going to change. It takes a fool to
project on a fool.
... having said it you and i both agree that if relations between China and India improved then it will certainly create problems for pakistan defence industry because then their all-weather friend will become somewhat neutral...
What I differ from you, deckingraj, is that instead of playing the "PRC card" to gain leverage over Pakistan; Indians should focus on the other way around.
Ever since Mumbai 11/26, CCP upper echelon have been clearly petrified by the prospect of any real "blow-out" between India and Pakistan - if not wholly out of "altruistic" concerns, the fear of a "spill-over" into the entire front of PRC's unstable west hung heavy in the air.
Fast forward a year or two, a visibly
Schadenfreudian India is not only touting an ill-timed "Cold Start" while Pakistan faces down some dangerous foes, it is also maneuvering for an "
advantage" in Pakistan's "strategic backyard" - however controversial and hotly denied such a concept may be.
Moreover, the real and perceived cozying up by the Saffronists to the International Neocon and
radical Israeli factions register an alarm amongst many outside of India - I can tell you that.
1962 was to me an "
aberration" - an accidental war. The irony was, until recently, most people in China had very little knowledge about it - they still don't, compared to the significance Indians tended to attach to it over the decades. Pakistan was not a consideration during that conflict. Tibet was.
However, a lot has changed in the 5, almost 6 decades since. What's happening in Pakistan and central Asia should factor heavily in the thinking of the PRC - not just Tibet.
Word has it that the PRC is in fact more "worried" about Xinjiang than about Tibet. Many do not rule out a scenario of a "highly autonomous" Tibet down the road - time will tell. The main haggle is going to be over size and population, I think.
PRC may
about AP - but the majority of its troops (from info "leaked" online) are nowhere near there. They are in fact in Southern Xinjiang, near Ladakh, on and around the Pamirs, and across from Sikkim.
That and the fact that Uncle won't allow it - India is better off shoving this "Cold Start" turkey into the freezer and focus on building a better relationship with Pakistan instead. Then everything else will fall into place.