INDIA does not have fourth or fifth generation aircrafts : IAF

[JohnWick]

Dead on Arrival -Rafale

What is your thought about rafale???

 

[Imran Khan]

Iaf is just trying to build press on the govt and court which have zero knowledge of jets so that iaf can get more Rafael and fifth generation aircraft...
And here Pakistanis are having mental masturbation over it...
Just think if mki is 3.5 gen jet then where does mighty thunder stands

so you mean IAF is liar ?

 

[ziaulislam]

Su 35 and F 35 has their own plus point but so far as electronics is concern, Rafale is unparallele. Its active cancellation system is state of art and spectra EW suite is just of its class.



You did not understand what they say. They were inducted when they were formally inducted in IAF. Adding numbers in not Induction.



If they said this than it is certainly a lie. Chinese 5th generation plane is a joke.

If every aircarft manufacturer like USA, britain on floor of there Senate say its not, but some one in india, a country that has never manufactured any aircraft independently think its a joke, then we must understand something is wrong somewhere

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Rafale is nothing compared to Su-30 MKI. It's a whole size class smaller too.

 

[JohnWick]

Rafale is nothing compared to Su-30 MKI. It's a whole size class smaller too.

What do think this mki junk is
J-15,j-16,su-35, j-20 and j-35 can easily shoot out this junk

 

[ACE OF THE AIR]

You are wrong, they asked for price which is given to them. Another D**klord asked "what if offset partners runs away?" like there is no govt enforcement. Does he think that it is like live-in relationship where person can just walk away. What sort of idiot can ask this question?
Will SC decide on airplanes/ Submarines. If yes, lets disband defense procurement committe as well as defense ministry.
Instead of President as Supreme Commander, lets make CJI as Supreme and PIL should be process to initiate any encounter, response to intrusion. SC is just stepping into executive part. Very bad precedent.

Well You do not know Court procedures, hence reason in childish frame of mind.
The learned Judges that sit in the Supreme Court are not teen agers they have spent 28-30 years handling cases daily in various courts.

To understand how Court works one has to realise the Judge can any time ask any person, company / legal entity to become Amicus Curiae. This is how they get experts on board to explain where they do not have the expertise. Moreover, Judges decide the case on what factual evidence that has been provided, it is humanly unimaginable that facts would not always be 100% in favor. That is the reason one side wins and the other looses.

Your question regarding an observation by one of the Judges can be answered in a very simple and logical way.

You might be aware that all points are written in a contract, hence if there is no specific mention to what happens when "X" fails to complete or leaves the Contract prematurely. Usually there is a specific section regarding this.

When the contract is not binding "X" in this regard then it gives rise various opinions and unlimited possibilities.



Why exactly was this question raised? can only be known when the said contract is made public.

So far it can only be speculated, that the learned Judge might not have seen the relevant section or perhaps the legal council for the DOD did not identify the exact page and para where adequate safeguards might have been taken care of.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

What is your thought about rafale???

It is good enough to confront Pakistan for the next decade.

 

[Arulmozhi Varman]

The reports are all mismatched junk.

This report itself is contradictory and then there's report that they replied "MKI is the last fighter to be inducted", to which the court responded, "So nothing after 1985 then".

LOL. Maybe they're talking about Su27 which was introduced in 1985, and thus the latest we've is a "1985 design".

The question I think from France........

 

[JohnWick]

It is good enough to confront Pakistan for the next decade.

Well not China?

 

[GodToons]

Well You do not know Court procedures, hence reason in childish frame of mind.
The learned Judges that sit in the Supreme Court are not teen agers they have spent 28-30 years handling cases daily in various courts.

To understand how Court works one has to realise the Judge can any time ask any person, company / legal entity to become Amicus Curiae. This is how they get experts on board to explain where they do not have the expertise. Moreover, Judges decide the case on what factual evidence that has been provided, it is humanly unimaginable that facts would not always be 100% in favor. That is the reason one side wins and the other looses.

Your question regarding an observation by one of the Judges can be answered in a very simple and logical way.

You might be aware that all points are written in a contract, hence if there is no specific mention to what happens when "X" fails to complete or leaves the Contract prematurely. Usually there is a specific section regarding this.

When the contract is not binding "X" in this regard then it gives rise various opinions and unlimited possibilities.



Why exactly was this question raised? can only be known when the said contract is made public.

So far it can only be speculated, that the learned Judge might not have seen the relevant section or perhaps the legal council for the DOD did not identify the exact page and para where adequate safeguards might have been taken care of.

Are judge are enforcing contracts OR evaluating contracts by saying what if offset partners run away?
CAG is competent institute to look into such cases and safeguarding Indian interests, Judiciary is just putting there leg to show its importance.

 

[WarKa DaNG]

Bith f 16s and jf is 4th gen

What about Mirage III/V and J-7 P andPG,are they?

 

[JohnWick]

What about Mirage III/V and J-7 P andPG,are they?

They are just same as your mig-21s
Jaguars su-22s and vintage mig-29

 

[Mustang06]

su-22s and vintage mig-29

There's no Su 22 and as we speak the Mig 29's are undergoing upgrades which put in it in same category as Pak blk 52's.

 

[JohnWick]

There's no Su 22 and as we speak the Mig 29's are undergoing upgrades which put in it in same category as Pak blk 52's.

Wake up the morning bell rings!!!!!
Russian vintage junks can not be on same as American ones like USA made F-22 30 years ago and until now no fighter even j-20 nearly meets its standards.
These upgrades are thier life extensions for few years (2-5 years) so you can passes some of your time.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

Well not China?

S-400 and Rafale is purely for Pakistan.

India and China have an understanding that they would not fight each other.