JohnWick
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Lt.Colonel.jpg)
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
- Messages
- 3,085
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so you mean IAF is liar ?Iaf is just trying to build press on the govt and court which have zero knowledge of jets so that iaf can get more Rafael and fifth generation aircraft...
And here Pakistanis are having mental masturbation over it...
Just think if mki is 3.5 gen jet then where does mighty thunder stands
If every aircarft manufacturer like USA, britain on floor of there Senate say its not, but some one in india, a country that has never manufactured any aircraft independently think its a joke, then we must understand something is wrong somewhereSu 35 and F 35 has their own plus point but so far as electronics is concern, Rafale is unparallele. Its active cancellation system is state of art and spectra EW suite is just of its class.
You did not understand what they say. They were inducted when they were formally inducted in IAF. Adding numbers in not Induction.
If they said this than it is certainly a lie. Chinese 5th generation plane is a joke.
What do think this mki junk isRafale is nothing compared to Su-30 MKI. It's a whole size class smaller too.
Well You do not know Court procedures, hence reason in childish frame of mind.You are wrong, they asked for price which is given to them. Another D**klord asked "what if offset partners runs away?" like there is no govt enforcement. Does he think that it is like live-in relationship where person can just walk away. What sort of idiot can ask this question?
Will SC decide on airplanes/ Submarines. If yes, lets disband defense procurement committe as well as defense ministry.
Instead of President as Supreme Commander, lets make CJI as Supreme and PIL should be process to initiate any encounter, response to intrusion. SC is just stepping into executive part. Very bad precedent.
What is your thought about rafale???![]()
The reports are all mismatched junk.
This report itself is contradictory and then there's report that they replied "MKI is the last fighter to be inducted", to which the court responded, "So nothing after 1985 then".
LOL. Maybe they're talking about Su27 which was introduced in 1985, and thus the latest we've is a "1985 design".
Well not China?It is good enough to confront Pakistan for the next decade.
Are judge are enforcing contracts OR evaluating contracts by saying what if offset partners run away?Well You do not know Court procedures, hence reason in childish frame of mind.
The learned Judges that sit in the Supreme Court are not teen agers they have spent 28-30 years handling cases daily in various courts.
To understand how Court works one has to realise the Judge can any time ask any person, company / legal entity to become Amicus Curiae. This is how they get experts on board to explain where they do not have the expertise. Moreover, Judges decide the case on what factual evidence that has been provided, it is humanly unimaginable that facts would not always be 100% in favor. That is the reason one side wins and the other looses.
Your question regarding an observation by one of the Judges can be answered in a very simple and logical way.
You might be aware that all points are written in a contract, hence if there is no specific mention to what happens when "X" fails to complete or leaves the Contract prematurely. Usually there is a specific section regarding this.
When the contract is not binding "X" in this regard then it gives rise various opinions and unlimited possibilities.
Why exactly was this question raised? can only be known when the said contract is made public.
So far it can only be speculated, that the learned Judge might not have seen the relevant section or perhaps the legal council for the DOD did not identify the exact page and para where adequate safeguards might have been taken care of.
What about Mirage III/V and J-7 P andPG,are they?Bith f 16s and jf is 4th gen
They are just same as your mig-21sWhat about Mirage III/V and J-7 P andPG,are they?
There's no Su 22 and as we speak the Mig 29's are undergoing upgrades which put in it in same category as Pak blk 52's.su-22s and vintage mig-29
Wake up the morning bell rings!!!!!There's no Su 22 and as we speak the Mig 29's are undergoing upgrades which put in it in same category as Pak blk 52's.
Well not China?