What's new

India developing Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle with 16.3 ton to GTO


ISRO is not best. Not even close to best. Every first mission of ISRO is been major fail. How success is 95%?

China sends 20+ missions a year where ISRO struggle to send 6. How are they best?

PSLV you mentioned is a joke. Its a toy rocket. Even a missile can achive same payload as PSLV.

ISRO will need Ariane this month. They said they will launch next setelite in Ariane. So please check that before you post. ISRO will need Ariane for many years because communication setelites are 6 to 8 tonns where MK3 can only do 4 tonnes. So yes they need Ariane.
I never said isro is the best.
These failures as you speak were during developmental flights.
Ok now show me a toy rocket which can launch 2.5 tons into orbit.
I also suggest you take a look on the budget isro is working when compared to say the Chinese space agency
 
.
I never said isro is the best.
These failures as you speak were during developmental flights.
Ok now show me a toy rocket which can launch 2.5 tons into orbit.
No those were real flights with real payloads.

Isro is not best but also ISRO is not one of best too. ISRO is only above SUPARCO but very very behind other developed nations. ISRO is 40 years behind compared to other countries like China and Russia in space science.
 
.
No those were real flights with real payloads.

Isro is not best but also ISRO is not one of best too. ISRO is only above SUPARCO but very very behind other developed nations. ISRO is 40 years behind compared to other countries like China and Russia in space science.
Comprehension error i was talking about reliability of launch vehicles.
Never said isro is the best.
 
.
I never said isro is the best.
These failures as you speak were during developmental flights.
Ok now show me a toy rocket which can launch 2.5 tons into orbit.
I also suggest you take a look on the budget isro is working when compared to say the Chinese space agency

Why you are arguing with the fake C**T hole. He is on a mission ha ha ha
 
.
Comprehension error i was talking about reliability of launch vehicles.
Never said isro is the best.
Besides toy rocket PSLV what other reliable rockets do we have?

GSLV MK1 was so unrealible that isro abondoned it.

GSLV MK2 failed constantly until last two three launches.

GSLV MK3 is only done 2 flights so give it time it will surly fail too.

Why you are arguing with the fake C**T hole. He is on a mission ha ha ha
using abusing language instade of inteligent reply is not inteligent behavior.
 
.
Space X can launch satellites cheaper than both India and China. Their space station resupply missions are also cheaper.

May be cheaper than China but not India. they are crying a lot and they have urged their government to to put ban on ISRO.
 
.
If that is so easy than why did you not took contract from American company and put those satellite in orbit.

Before trolling here, read what your news paper wrote about Indian satellite launch. I know that whole 50 cent gang was surprisingly absent on PDF that day.
And we build launch vehicle to put satellite in orbit and not satellite to match the weight carrying capability of vehicle (China may be doing it) . We had a 3300 KG satellite which we put in orbit.
I don't quite get your superb indic english here, are you saying we used US rocket launchers or are you saying why we were not launching for the US? Ever since 1999, China stopped launching commercial US satellites due to embargo, we had the cheapest launchers 20 years ago. I don't had ever used US launchers for anything.

Man, you need to improve your english, I have no idea what are you trying to say. Your launch vehicles are pathetic.

Why. Russian rocket was not sufficient. What about failed moon mission????????
You have no capability to success even on moon but you are talking big mouth about MARS. You will not be able to reach their till 2050 or till India helps you.

Bro, you need to calm down. It was India having a failed moon mission, since India had only launched ONE. China had 3 missions to the moon, and all were successful except for one of the rovers. This is the real failure I will admit. We completed the moon mineral map, highest resolution surface map, had the first lunar telescope, first ground penetrating radar on the moon. What did you do? You claimed to find water after the Americans claimed it. LOL.:partay:. The question is would you dare claim it if they didn't?
 
. .
But but...nothing comes close to long mach 3b. It has the capability to transform itself into a ballistic missile and take out an entire village
Bro, calm down. I don't want to start comparing Indian failures. But the fact remains, India is a backward country compared to China and GSLV MKIII payload is practically useless for modern satellites. You need to accept reality.
 
.
May be cheaper than China but not India. they are crying a lot and they have urged their government to to put ban on ISRO.

SpaceX has set a new pricing low based on cost-effective design, vertical integration, and high launch volume. India is a low-cost country for manufacturing, but that's not enough to beat SpaceX's price or cost.
 
.

ISRO is not best. Not even close to best. Every first mission of ISRO is been major fail. How success is 95%?

China sends 20+ missions a year where ISRO struggle to send 6. How are they best?

PSLV you mentioned is a joke. Its a toy rocket. Even a missile can achive same payload as PSLV.

ISRO will need Ariane this month. They said they will launch next setelite in Ariane. So please check that before you post. ISRO will need Ariane for many years because communication setelites are 6 to 8 tonns where MK3 can only do 4 tonnes. So yes they need Ariane.
Dark Lord, please don't compare Indian launch failures. We are here to debate space capabilities. The truth is ISRO didn't dare launch anything near 4 tonnes for a reason. They were afraid it will explode like all previous first launches. And even after they launch 3.2 tonnes, the next few satellites are still going to use Ariane, and yet they shout to the world, they are self reliant after this and it is indigenous. Nobody even knows, how much of the rocket is indigenous. It was only until this launch they are using indigenous lithium batteries, I suspect the new triple junction solar panels are still imported, the transponders too as usual. The just buy and integrate in Ahmadabad and claim it to be indigenous.
 
.
But but...nothing comes close to long mach 3b. It has the capability to transform itself into a ballistic missile and take out an entire village

I hope they provided justice to poor villagers and allowed them to move to bigger cities to cover what they lost.
 
. .
SpaceX has set a new pricing low based on cost-effective design, vertical integration, and high launch volume. India is a low-cost country for manufacturing, but that's not enough to beat SpaceX's price or cost.
Again, why does everybody say India launch is cheapest? I dare say if US lift up the embargo, China would dominate the launch market like how we nearly did back in the mid nineties. Their import content is so high, it is highly doubtful they can compete with China.
 
.
Dark Lord, please don't compare Indian launch failures. We are here to debate space capabilities. The truth is ISRO didn't dare launch anything near 4 tonnes for a reason. They were afraid it will explode like all previous first launches. And even after they launch 3.2 tonnes, the next few satellites are still going to use Ariane, and yet they shout to the world, they are self reliant after this and it is indigenous. Nobody even knows, how much of the rocket is indigenous. It was only until this launch they are using indigenous lithium batteries, I suspect the new triple junction solar panels are still imported, the transponders too as usual. The just buy and integrate in Ahmadabad and claim it to be indigenous.

Han Patriot "Hail CCP" "Hail PLA" We will avenge Japanese.

Again, why does everybody say India launch is cheapest? I dare say if US lift up the embargo, China would dominate the launch market like how we nearly did back in the mid nineties. Their import content is so high, it is highly doubtful they can compete with China.

I am so sad to know that China is not competent enough because of American sanctions. Why such dependency of USA ?

PLA should avenge America with mass invasion.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom