India-China relations going through a very difficult phase, border issue has not been resolved: EAM Jaishankar

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

EAM Jaishankar said both the countries had border pacts going back to the 1990s which prohibited bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas but Beijing has disregarded those agreements.​

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Sunday said that it was no secret that the relationship between India and China was going through a very difficult phase. He said both the countries had border pacts going back to the 1990s which prohibited bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas but Beijing has disregarded those agreements.

"Right now it is no secret, we are going through a very difficult phase mainly because we had agreements with China going back to the 1990s, which prohibit bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas, they have disregarded that," he said.

"You know what happened in the Galwan valley. That problem has not been resolved and that has been clearly casting a shadow," he said, adding that relationships are a two-way street and a lasting relationship cannot be a one-way street. "We need that mutual respect and mutual sensitivity. Right now it is no secret we are going through a very difficult phase," S Jaishankar added.

India and China are locked in a years-long border dispute in eastern Ladakh. The dispute escalated in 2020 after the Chinese amassed massive troops along the LAC and entered the areas claimed by India. China has been maintaining a massive presence of troops and developing infrastructure along the border.

Earlier this week, Jaishankar in Bangkok said that India's relationship with China was going through an 'extremely difficult phase' because of what Beijing did at LAC.

India and China have signed several border agreements to maintain peace and tranquility along the LAC.

In an agreement signed on 7 September 1993, New Delhi and Beijing agreed to resolve the border situation through peaceful and friendly consultations. "Neither side shall use or threaten to use force against the other by any means...the two sides shall strictly respect and observe the line of actual control between the two sides. No activities of either side shall overstep the line of actual control," the pact said.

"Each side will keep its military forces in the areas along the line of actual control to a minimum level compatible with the friendly and good neighbourly relations between the two countries. The two sides agree to reduce their military forces along the line of actual control in conformity with the requirements of the principle of mutual and equal security to ceilings to be mutually agreed," it added.

However, Beijing disregarded this by amassing thousands of troops near LAC in April 2020.

India-China relations going through a very difficult phase, border issue has not been resolved: EAM Jaishankar

EAM Jaishankar said both the countries had border pacts going back to the 1990s which prohibited bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas but Beijing has disregarded those agreements. , India News - Times Now

www.timesnownews.com

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

EAM Jaishankar said both the countries had border pacts going back to the 1990s which prohibited bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas but Beijing has disregarded those agreements.​

View attachment 872649
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Sunday said that it was no secret that the relationship between India and China was going through a very difficult phase. He said both the countries had border pacts going back to the 1990s which prohibited bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas but Beijing has disregarded those agreements.

"Right now it is no secret, we are going through a very difficult phase mainly because we had agreements with China going back to the 1990s, which prohibit bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas, they have disregarded that," he said.

"You know what happened in the Galwan valley. That problem has not been resolved and that has been clearly casting a shadow," he said, adding that relationships are a two-way street and a lasting relationship cannot be a one-way street. "We need that mutual respect and mutual sensitivity. Right now it is no secret we are going through a very difficult phase," S Jaishankar added.

India and China are locked in a years-long border dispute in eastern Ladakh. The dispute escalated in 2020 after the Chinese amassed massive troops along the LAC and entered the areas claimed by India. China has been maintaining a massive presence of troops and developing infrastructure along the border.

Earlier this week, Jaishankar in Bangkok said that India's relationship with China was going through an 'extremely difficult phase' because of what Beijing did at LAC.

India and China have signed several border agreements to maintain peace and tranquility along the LAC.

In an agreement signed on 7 September 1993, New Delhi and Beijing agreed to resolve the border situation through peaceful and friendly consultations. "Neither side shall use or threaten to use force against the other by any means...the two sides shall strictly respect and observe the line of actual control between the two sides. No activities of either side shall overstep the line of actual control," the pact said.

"Each side will keep its military forces in the areas along the line of actual control to a minimum level compatible with the friendly and good neighbourly relations between the two countries. The two sides agree to reduce their military forces along the line of actual control in conformity with the requirements of the principle of mutual and equal security to ceilings to be mutually agreed," it added.

However, Beijing disregarded this by amassing thousands of troops near LAC in April 2020.

India-China relations going through a very difficult phase, border issue has not been resolved: EAM Jaishankar

EAM Jaishankar said both the countries had border pacts going back to the 1990s which prohibited bringing massive troops into the prohibited areas but Beijing has disregarded those agreements. , India News - Times Now

www.timesnownews.com

It has already been settled. China continues to annex more indian territory yet the indians continue to accept this. China can do what it wants to india and NO-ONE can do anything about it. Since 2020, China has annexed over 1000 square kms of indian territory on top of the 38,000 square kms of indian territory they already possess:

The Wire: The Wire News India, Latest News,News from India, Politics, External Affairs, Science, Economics, Gender and Culture

The Wire: The Wire News India, Latest News,News from India, Politics, External Affairs, Science, Economics, Gender and Culture

www.google.co.uk

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

China continues to annex more indian territory yet the indians continue to accept this.

This map is the primary task, excluding Kashmir and GB.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

This map is the primary task, excluding Kashmir and GB.
View attachment 872651

The Chinese will seize all that land and the indians will not even utter a whisper.

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

The Chinese will seize all that land and the indians will not even utter a whisper.

China wants the entire Northern Chunk of India, which they consider part of Tibet. Plus they are also eying the Doglam-Siliguri Corridor.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

China wants the entire Northern Chunk of India, which they consider part of Tibet. Plus they are also eying the Doglam-Siliguri Corridor.

In time, the Chinese will seize them all. When they do, india will not utter a whisper against China. They will only swear, condemn Pakistan and probably kill a significant number of indian Muslims. That's it.

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

In time, the Chinese will seize them all. When they do, india will not utter a whisper against China. They will only swear, condemn Pakistan and probably kill a significant number of indian Muslims. That's it.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

TTP ‘check-post’ set up in Swat: report

TTP’s return has spread a wave of fear and panic among residents

www.geo.tv

1000sq km? not a single inch territory captured, dispute happened at neutral perception of LAC in no man zone. Not in main territory where Indian Army's outpost is deployed. Disengagement happened from some areas & still going on.Even China Haven't claim 1k sqkm captured
In pangong tso for example china claims & patrolled up to finger 4 and india to finger 8. current buffer is f4 to f8. in depsang india is blocked from its patrol pts 8km east of y-junction while china blocked from its point 7km west of y-junction. both deny each other access. And China used to patrol till F-4. They can no longer come there either. India's on paper LAC claim is 18km east of y-junction in what is historically Pla controlled territory. Which is why Indian troops only asserted control up to 8km east of y-junction via patrols. If china had a upper hand it would have escalated in ladakh rather than withdrawing from pangong tso and continuing to be denied access to its patrol line near burtse in depsang. also note all remaining friction pts are where india is also denying china access to pla patrol points.


When 50,000 Indian troops are facing equal number of Chinese troops, then there is no chance that Chinese would advance an inch forward. Now Indian policy to deal with Chinese has changed. India will capture Chinese occupied territory if ever China advances. Remember the Kailash Heights capture by india a year and half back. Chinese troops had no recourse but to vacate Pangong Tso Lake area. Same thing could happen to Hot Spring area. If they move, then Indian troops will cut off the road which passes near its eye sight post and deny access to their Galwan River Valley positions.

Chumbi Valley is a bad job to the Chinese. India is in strong position there. Chinese are in the valley and Indian troops command the heights. No invading army could cross over into Indian held heights without being mauled. Other reason for them to cross over is to surrender to the Indian troops who would be pounding Chinese positions with huge artillery fire.

Tawang area is hostile to China. People there hate the Chinese. Indian road and tunnel has reached Tawang for more and better reinforcements. This time, if they cross ThagLa Ridge then it will be their Waterloo. Hence they will threaten and never dare to cross the ThagLa Ridge. They value their phoney prestige and Chinese troops surrender will kill it. The IAF base in Hasimara is under the operational command of the Shillong-based Eastern Air Command, which shares the security concerns of the Line of Actual Control along with the Western Air Command and Prayagraj-based Central Air Command.

Hasimara Air Force Station is responsible for the protection of the tiny Chicken's Neck or the Siliguri Corridor in North Bengal, a narrow stretch of land about 22 kilometres wide that connects the country's mainland with the northeastern states.

The base is also shouldering the responsibility of securing the Nathula Pass in Sikkim from the Chinese. In the event of war, support from the Hasimara airbase to the three important army mountain divisions based in Gangtok, Binnaguri and Kalimpong respectively under the Sukna-based 33 Corps could have a decisive impact on the outcome. Hence the stationing of the Rafale fighter jets assumes paramount significance. The air security in the North East is primarily handled by the IAF bases in Tezpur and Chabua (both in Assam) with the Sukhoi-30 aircraft as the most potent weapon delivery machine.

The IAF base in Jorhat, Assam, also houses one of the two AH-64E (I) Apache helicopter squadrons. The other squadron is in Pathankot. All airbases in the North East are under the command of the Eastern Air Command and completely focussed on activities along the Line of Actual Control in their respective area of operations.
The second base of Rafale is at Hashimara (West Bengal). Pakistan is not the real enemy as far air power is concerned, but our eastern neighbour China is. When we didn’t have Rafale, we had moved three squadrons of Sukhoi in the east. With Rafale, we will have adequate number of airborne fighters and fighter bombers to look after the China threat

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.financialexpress.com/defence/iaf-will-receive-s-400-air-defence-system-from-russia-by-2023/2632511/lite/

Have you ever wondered how ballistic cum cruise missile like Shaurya survives the high aero-thermal loads experienced while flying at highly depressed trajectories (like a cruise missile) at hypersonic speeds of ~ 8 Mach ?
One way to deal with that is to ensure uniform heat distribution over the missile body (prevent sustained localised heating)
This is done by rolling the missile while inflight via deflection of rear fin in the tandem fins configuration which results in a corkscrew effect forcing the missile to roll. There is also a ablative coating which not only provides thermal protection but also reduces drag & increases range
This allows Shaurya to survive while flying low within the dense atmosphere like a cruise missile at high hypersonic speeds. Similar Tandem Fin configuration is also seen in SMART & PRALAY missiles

Which IMO implies that both SMART & PRALAY also posses the capability to execute (and survive) flight trajectories similar to ballistic cum cruise missiles (eg depressed trajectories) if so required

The following article says otherwise:

The Wire: The Wire News India, Latest News,News from India, Politics, External Affairs, Science, Economics, Gender and Culture

The Wire: The Wire News India, Latest News,News from India, Politics, External Affairs, Science, Economics, Gender and Culture

www.google.co.uk

Do you have ANY evidence to refute the above article and back up your claims? If so remember to post the links to the evidence here.

 

[JohnyD]

The Chinese will seize all that land and the indians will not even utter a whisper.

we will reover the lost land from Pakistan..

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

we will reover the lost land from Pakistan..

Perhaps online or especially on bha-rat-sh*t forum............

 

[vishwambhar]

TTP ‘check-post’ set up in Swat: report

TTP’s return has spread a wave of fear and panic among residents

www.geo.tv

1000sq km? not a single inch territory captured, dispute happened at neutral perception of LAC in no man zone. Not in main territory where Indian Army's outpost is deployed. Disengagement happened from some areas & still going on.Even China Haven't claim 1k sqkm captured
In pangong tso for example china claims & patrolled up to finger 4 and india to finger 8. current buffer is f4 to f8. in depsang india is blocked from its patrol pts 8km east of y-junction while china blocked from its point 7km west of y-junction. both deny each other access. And China used to patrol till F-4. They can no longer come there either. India's on paper LAC claim is 18km east of y-junction in what is historically Pla controlled territory. Which is why Indian troops only asserted control up to 8km east of y-junction via patrols. If china had a upper hand it would have escalated in ladakh rather than withdrawing from pangong tso and continuing to be denied access to its patrol line near burtse in depsang. also note all remaining friction pts are where india is also denying china access to pla patrol points.


When 50,000 Indian troops are facing equal number of Chinese troops, then there is no chance that Chinese would advance an inch forward. Now Indian policy to deal with Chinese has changed. India will capture Chinese occupied territory if ever China advances. Remember the Kailash Heights capture by india a year and half back. Chinese troops had no recourse but to vacate Pangong Tso Lake area. Same thing could happen to Hot Spring area. If they move, then Indian troops will cut off the road which passes near its eye sight post and deny access to their Galwan River Valley positions.

Chumbi Valley is a bad job to the Chinese. India is in strong position there. Chinese are in the valley and Indian troops command the heights. No invading army could cross over into Indian held heights without being mauled. Other reason for them to cross over is to surrender to the Indian troops who would be pounding Chinese positions with huge artillery fire.

Tawang area is hostile to China. People there hate the Chinese. Indian road and tunnel has reached Tawang for more and better reinforcements. This time, if they cross ThagLa Ridge then it will be their Waterloo. Hence they will threaten and never dare to cross the ThagLa Ridge. They value their phoney prestige and Chinese troops surrender will kill it. The IAF base in Hasimara is under the operational command of the Shillong-based Eastern Air Command, which shares the security concerns of the Line of Actual Control along with the Western Air Command and Prayagraj-based Central Air Command.

Hasimara Air Force Station is responsible for the protection of the tiny Chicken's Neck or the Siliguri Corridor in North Bengal, a narrow stretch of land about 22 kilometres wide that connects the country's mainland with the northeastern states.

The base is also shouldering the responsibility of securing the Nathula Pass in Sikkim from the Chinese. In the event of war, support from the Hasimara airbase to the three important army mountain divisions based in Gangtok, Binnaguri and Kalimpong respectively under the Sukna-based 33 Corps could have a decisive impact on the outcome. Hence the stationing of the Rafale fighter jets assumes paramount significance. The air security in the North East is primarily handled by the IAF bases in Tezpur and Chabua (both in Assam) with the Sukhoi-30 aircraft as the most potent weapon delivery machine.

The IAF base in Jorhat, Assam, also houses one of the two AH-64E (I) Apache helicopter squadrons. The other squadron is in Pathankot. All airbases in the North East are under the command of the Eastern Air Command and completely focussed on activities along the Line of Actual Control in their respective area of operations.
The second base of Rafale is at Hashimara (West Bengal). Pakistan is not the real enemy as far air power is concerned, but our eastern neighbour China is. When we didn’t have Rafale, we had moved three squadrons of Sukhoi in the east. With Rafale, we will have adequate number of airborne fighters and fighter bombers to look after the China threat

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.financialexpress.com/defence/iaf-will-receive-s-400-air-defence-system-from-russia-by-2023/2632511/lite/

Have you ever wondered how ballistic cum cruise missile like Shaurya survives the high aero-thermal loads experienced while flying at highly depressed trajectories (like a cruise missile) at hypersonic speeds of ~ 8 Mach ?
One way to deal with that is to ensure uniform heat distribution over the missile body (prevent sustained localised heating)
This is done by rolling the missile while inflight via deflection of rear fin in the tandem fins configuration which results in a corkscrew effect forcing the missile to roll. There is also a ablative coating which not only provides thermal protection but also reduces drag & increases range
This allows Shaurya to survive while flying low within the dense atmosphere like a cruise missile at high hypersonic speeds. Similar Tandem Fin configuration is also seen in SMART & PRALAY missiles

Which IMO implies that both SMART & PRALAY also posses the capability to execute (and survive) flight trajectories similar to ballistic cum cruise missiles (eg depressed trajectories) if so required

you should not have disturbed them.... both were busy dreaming by replying to each other..... you spoiled their party....