jeypore
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 2,885
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Conclusion: A primary target of an Indian ICBM would be the United States. The technology of an Indian ICBM would be that of a space launch vehicle, either directly via the PSLV or indirectly via the Agni, which is based on India’s SLV-3. The United States should not facilitate the acquisition or improve ment of that technology directly or indirectly. In this matter, U.S. clarity and restraint are what the world and India need.
The United States needs to divert from the present glide path and reorient itself and India onto a more produc tive course of cooperation. It would be a cruel irony if, in the hope of becoming strategic partners, we became each other’s strategic targets.
First all Mr. Ali, I have read the article, but the conclusion says it all besides all the minority mambo jumbo that i have constantly have read.
How is US going to stop the development of India's ICBM and restrain India? India has been doing these development with US restrains for last 60 years.The United States should not facilitate the acquisition or improve ment of that technology directly or indirectly. In this matter, U.S. clarity and restraint are what the world and India need.
The United States needs to divert from the present glide path and reorient itself and India onto a more produc tive course of cooperation
And this is probably the most idiodic statement of all time. How is India on a glide path not in favorable to United States. If it is then, why Give India Nuclear Proliferations. And also what is the meaning of more productive cooperation? India should cooperate to whom United States, Pakistan, Bangledash, etc....
The question is why would India be suddenly become a treat to US, like this author is suggesting. It is a stupidity idea even to ponder a this stage of India's growth.