hj786
So you have no idea about the security of each country's weapons are, all you have to go on is "they both went to USA to learn." Pakistan has more reasons to keep their arsenal under the best security systems they can come up and vet personnel properly than India does. USA, Israel and India don't like Pak having nukes and the first two have renowned intelligence institutions.
Well its like going to school, you have your basics and then you work through them.
So the point was about basics. Have even given you the name of the officers in this case, so apparently am not talking out of my hat or in blind, or without having some idea of what am talking about.
You can check up on the veracity of the concerned officer, he was in Somalia in UN and was posted as representative to UN under Musharraf if you have any suspicion that I have named an individual out of air
Contention of having better security in place was taken up and challenged, and your rebuttal was a poor excuse at one here.
All you have to go on is "a PA officer attended a US institution." Yes you are talking blind.
If you believe China gave Pakistan that nuclear arsenal, why isn't their command and control system implemented in Pakistan?
So how do you choose whether to believe what he says or not? He said Pakistan has no first-strike policy and you know that's BS. Why would they ever allow radicals to get inside, the first target could well be Pakistan's military institutions.
Infact he said it for Pakistan has reportedly developed a second strike policy, something now that they find is more conducive and in sync with image of a responsible nuclear power.
This has increased Pakistani defence posturing vis-a-vis India and has further underlined the end of any threat of a full scale conventional warfare.
A head of state does not make stupid statements and that includes your own Head of state.
Read this for your pleasure:
Pak develops second-strike N-capability - US - World - The Times of India
What are you talking about? I was referring to this: Asif Ali Zardari delights India with 'no first strike' policy | The Australian
Because those defences probably wouldn't work anyway.
Because there is something called kill probability which will be degraded due to MIRVs, not because of your ridiculous idea above. Ever heard of "swarm" concept in ABM defences? I doubt it
So if you have any idea of the same, accept that and stop posting just for the heck of posting and being "in action"!