India and "terrorist state" demands

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

he might be a social or political hero for you but for the world he is a terrorist and operating inside pakistan. he is alleged with many charges not only in India but with US as well and involved in many of the killings. its not a complain and it make sense.

without evidence he is a social worker only. he had been seen only threatening india just like RSS and bjp. that doesnot make him terrorist. if he is a terrorist then modi had threatened pakistan and muslims more than anyone else. modi is a terrorist too. infact modi killed people too.
For US definition of terrorist is politically motivated. how is a bad terrorist like hikmatyar a good terrorist now?

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

lol there is no definition of terrorist or terrorism in pakistan as we already have seen some social worker in the form of LADEN and AZHAR MAHSOOD etc etc. you can deny but that not gonna work as world is not blind and does not run around pakistan.

why are you indians copying US on every issue.. bin laden was a US creation. masood azhar is not terrorist. go first beg china to declare him terrorist.
Brahamdagh bugti, dilai lama and Prabhakaran along with full support of RSS and BJP are your social workers.

india was the first country in the region to start proxy wars through afghanistan for pashtunistan and balochistan in 1950s,60s,70s. mukti bahni in 60s,70s.
you don't have the right to cry now. you lost it.
pakistan had to react to save its interest.