India abstains on UN resolution that condemns Russian invasion of Ukraine, explains move

[Englishman]

Love it

The yanks have vetoed Israeli terrorism and genocide several times. Now they get a taste of it.

If you support Ukraine then it's logical to have some sympathy for the Palestinians. If you don't, you are a hypocrite.

 

[kahu]

All Pakistanis commenting here know in their hearts that India will always come out in top at the end of such situations.


Common mate you know ,you guys should be the last to teach honor to indians.

Like India came on top on 27th Feb? like ur Mig 21 shot F16 without "phiring" a single "mijle",

wet dreams

Actually no one should waste time teaching Indians honor moral etc

 

[Brainsucker]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1497547855053012993

USSR and Russia's past veto in favour of India


In the early years, USSR used to use the veto power frequently, so much so that as per reports, the then Soviet ambassador Andrei Gromyko earned the nickname Mr Nyet and Vyacheslav Molotov was known as Mr Veto. Over the years, the USSR/Russia has cast a total of 146 vetoes, or close to half of all vetoes. Since 1946, when the USSR used the veto power on a draft resolution regarding the withdrawal of foreign troops from Lebanon and Syria, the veto has been recorded 294 times.
Over the years, USSR/Russia has used the veto power in favour of India as well. In all, the permanent member of the UNSC has used the veto power four times in support of India.
1957

The USSR first used the veto power for India in 1957 over the Kashmir issue. When Nikita Khrushchev, the then leader of the Soviet Union, visited India in 1955, he said that Moscow was just 'across the border' and in case of any trouble in Kashmir, Delhi should just give a shout to the USSR. He stayed true to his words, and when Pakistan proposed the use of a temporary UN force in connection the demilitarisation and the bilateral issue was close to becoming an international issue, USSR used the veto power in favour of India.
1961

In 1961, Portugal sent a letter to the UNSC concerning Goa. At that time, Goa was still under the power of Portugal and India was trying to liberate the region and make it a part of our nation. Unlike France, Portugal refused to let go of its territories in India and even opened fire on the protesters in Goa.
As per reports, Nikita Khrushchev sent a telegram to former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in which he said India's actions "to do away with outposts of colonialism in its territory were absolutely lawful and justified".

Portugal tried to invoke the UN Charter and proposed a resolution that India should withdraw their forces from Goa. The proposal was supported by the United States, the United Kingdom and France. But USSR came to India's rescue and blew away the proposal by using the veto power. It strengthened India's cause, and on December 19, 1961, Goa was finally liberated from the rule of Portugal.
It is important to note that it was USSR's 99th veto.
1962

USSR used its 100th veto in 1962, and this time again, in favour of India. An Irish Resolution in the UNSC urged India and Pakistan to directly negotiate with one another to settle the Kashmir issue. Seven UNSC members supported it, and among them were four permanent members - the US, France, UK and China. The Indian delegation refused to accept the resolution and then, the Russian delegate Platon Dmitrievich Morozov used the veto power to make the resolution null and void.
1971

In 1965, after the India-Pakistan War began, the then Pakistani foreign minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto raised the Kashmir issue at the UN, and the Indian delegation walked out in protest. According to reports, Kunwar Natwar Singh, the former Minister of External Affairs termed the walkout as a 'turning point' for the UN regarding the Kashmir issue. The Kashmir issue became dormant in the UNSC except in 1971 when resolutions were proposed over the Kashmir issue, but in December 1971, when India was engaged in a war against Pakistan to liberate Bangladesh, the USSR used its veto power thrice to ensure that the issue remains a bilateral one instead of becoming a global concern that could attract interference from third-party nations.

Veto power: What is it and how many times Russia has used it in favour of India

If a permanent member does not fully agree with a proposed resolution but does not wish to cast a veto, it may choose to abstain, thus allowing the resolution to be adopted if it obtains the required number of nine favourable votes.

www.google.com

Well, who care. United States need India more than India need them. US needs India to contain China. But India doesn't need to be China enemy if they don't want to. I think I respect India with their decision here. It means that they have integrity not to betray the one who helped them in the past.

 

[Riz]

Response of common Europeans and Americans to these cow minded extremists indians for not condemning russia

https://twitter.com/x/status/1497404202947018752

 

[K_Bin_W]

Like India came on top on 27th Feb? like ur Mig 21 shot F16 without "phiring" a single "mijle",

wet dreams

Actually no one should waste time teaching Indians honor moral etc

Indian has been coming on top for last 1000 years if you know what I mean...

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Delusional Indian hindu rat, allow me to educate you.

American led group of nations chose India to be nuisance for Pakistan and China, a role of their regional pet dog, which you gladly accepted. But when push came to shove, got b!tch slapped by Pakistan, and China, well, it just clubbed you to death and conquered 1200 sq kms of your claimed territory without firing a single bullet. In nutshell, geopolitically India value is now close to zero. You are not capable for the task that your western masters assigned you. Now when your masters ask you to atleast support them with numbers in UN, all it took was a phone call from Putin to Modi. LOL.

Being a cheap labour source, is what your worth is now.

You are just another chota jungi momin with a brainwashed logic. You are trolling your own thread and making racist religious remarks. How more pathetic you could be?

Pakistan has always been a slave of any big power all the time, so mentality of citizens of Pakistan has been become like that no country can survive without becoming a slave of a big power.
I tell you you pathetic brainwashed creature, India played both side, and will play in future too. This is called diplomacy which is just out of your little mind.

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

I have heard this logic a million times before. All this situation does is expose Indian weakness where it is unable to choose a side and provide clarity. At best this is appeasment of both sides.

This is all business. You can call it appeasement. India is working on its own interests. I don't know why do you think it's a weakness. You should praise Indian diplomacy if you are honest with your views leaving aside your hate for a moment and thinking neutral.
Pakistan lacks diplomacy skills which is why it stands nowhere on global stage and economically getting weaker.

 

[paritosh]

An Indian saying this? Has Hell frozen over?

We have been the pioneers of non alignment as the idea was to be independent in foreign policy. It’s sad that staying non aligned has been very difficult to the point of being impractical. Before China or Pakistan became big concerns, the ghost of colonialism was the only real terrifying thought that had Nehru and Co. lay down the scaffold for our non aligned foreign policy that aspired for strategic autonomy.

 

[Riz]

You are just another chota jungi momin with a brainwashed logic. You are trolling your own thread and making racist religious remarks. How more pathetic you could be?

Pakistan has always been a slave of any big power all the time, so mentality of citizens of Pakistan has been become like that no country can survive without becoming a slave of a big power.
I tell you you pathetic brainwashed creature, India played both side, and will play in future too. This is called diplomacy which is just out of your little mind.

for remaining slaves of us Muslims for more then 1200 long and record years, now any thing related to us Pakistanis look like slavery to you We are aware of mental conditionS of you morons , This bhika nanaga Pakistan successfully thrown you out from Afghanistan, dumped another supaa pawaaa Into dust , check mated you in ukaraine cross after the successful visit of khan to Russia, just think from your brain moron, pak never stands besides the losers until today, besides the whom we stands it becomes victorious, now india have two options left 100 onions or 100 lashes , and i know incredible india will eat and receive both

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

for remaining slaves of us Muslims for more then 1200 long and record years, now any thing related to us Pakistanis look like slavery to you We are aware of mental conditionS of you morons , This bhika nanaga Pakistan successfully thrown you out from Afghanistan, dumped another supaa pawaaa Into dust , check mated you in ukaraine cross after the successful visit of khan to Russia, just think from your brain moron, pak never stands besides the losers until today, besides the whom we stands it becomes victorious, now india have two options left 100 onions or 100 lashes , and i know incredible india will eat and receive both

Using fancy emoji doesn't make you sound intelligent. You are still a brainwashed zombie who don't have any knowledge of geopolitics. You come here just for abuses and to make racists remarks. This is where you are good at. Leave serious debates to serious intellectuals. You just try reading something outside of PDF comments.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

India/Modi also remaind Neutral when China invaded Ladakh, India and captured a good 1000 sq.kms of landmass, India thought that its good to be non aligned and remain neutral.

Why Is PM Modi Not Speaking About China? - HW News English

PM Modi’s response and “Not-naming of China” principle seems a copout. It also shows the inconsistent response to the border clash along LAC and LOC. It has been 15 days since the unfateful night of June 15 when 20 Indian soldiers were martyred and several injured in a violent…

hwnews.in

PM Modi a coward who can’t stand up to China, says Rahul Gandhi

Congress leader launches scathing attack a day after Centre announces pact over disengagement

www.thehindu.com

How much of Indian land is occupied by China? As Centre, Congress trade barbs, truth lies in Parliament records

The Congress jumped at the 43,000 sq km figure sensing that it was an opportunity to corner the government. Congress leaders started the chant that “the clarification indicates that India lost 5,000 sq km in Ladakh. However, truth of the Chinese occupation of Indian territory lies in the records...

www.indiatoday.in

 

[Tshering22]

Look at this.

Shocking and disgusting.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1497735858606256133

 

[SIPRA]

India has made a decision, what it was bound to make. There is no surprise here. The decision reflects the following considerations:
1) India's dependence on Russian defense equipment and technology
2) Role, Russia can play in diffusing India's tensions with China
3) India's intention of not confronting China in a big way, and avoiding any large conflict
4) Mutual and reciprocal lack of trust between US/West and India

 

[N.Siddiqui]

We have been the pioneers of non alignment as the idea was to be independent in foreign policy. It’s sad that staying non aligned has been very difficult to the point of being impractical.

Non aligned or remaining neutral also means that in case of the country being attacked or when help is needed, no other country will move forward to help the country say in wars.

There need to be some alignment or some strategic partnership, maybe for smaller countries this becomes a requirement.

 

[SIPRA]

India/Modi also remaind Neutral when China invaded Ladakh, India and captured a good 1000 sq.kms of landmass, India thought that its good to be non aligned and remain neutral.

In these clashes, India was not "neutral", but was rather "neutered".