What's new

India: a global hub for warship building

^^^ Any links for this claim ?
Dude what's your problem, everytime we mention any development in India you will say I have bigger. Agreed you are big whatever but that does not mean you have to belittle everything India is doing. Let's once and for all clarify that China is ahead of India and anything we do you might have done already. Happy now, chill man get the context of discussion.

ignore that moron. that idiot does it in every thread, doesnt know anything about what he's trolling about. he's probably got that quintessential tiny prick syndrome!
 
.

I remember a certain thread where your posts led you to be banned.Hope you also remember that...

I understand your dislike for India and Indians and the way things work or dont work in India. Most us Indians dont like it too...

Are all Chinese like you? If yes, its good news for India. We dont need too many warships to fight you...you anyways think India is crap and hold no future. Good.

Please keep thinking that way till 2020 and also please dont start a war before that.
 
.
I remember a certain thread where your posts led you to be banned.Hope you also remember that...

I understand your dislike for India and Indians and the way things work or dont work in India. Most us Indians dont like it too...

Are all Chinese like you? If yes, its good news for India. We dont need too many warships to fight you...you anyways think India is crap and hold no future. Good.

Please keep thinking that way till 2020 and also please dont start a war before that.

Hey man, wake up, thats not me you are talking about, remember

the forum rules, no personal attacks !! HaHaHa

Personally i only hate some ignorant Indians not all of you.

BTW, good luck to your future so-called global hub for warship building

dream.:smitten::pakistan::china:
 
.
Navy Chief Questions India's Shipbuilding Pace - Defense News

NEW DELHI - India's Navy chief, concerned shipbuilding could be falling behind schedule, wants to review building processes.

Addressing the annual Navy Day news conference here Dec. 2, Adm. Nirmal Verma said, "We need to revisit the building strategies of the [defense] shipyards. There is a need to do much more. Construction schedule is where our shipyards lag. The reason for delays is the basic method of construction."


India's shipbuilding capacity is saturated and the Navy plans to induct more warships at a faster pace to replace the large number of vessels to be scrapped in the next five years, said an Indian Navy officer.

The Navy has ordered 34 ships from three different shipyards, but the rate of delivery is only one ship per year, Verma said.

The Navy plans to order weaponry and equipment worth more than $15 billion in the next 10 to 12 years. Under a long-term plan approved last year, the Navy will procure 60 new warships, submarines, one additional aircraft carrier, maritime surveillance aircraft, C4ISR equipment, a dedicated satellite and other sea-based assets.

Mehra said India's first indigenous aircraft carrier will be launched next year and commissioned in 2014, and indicated that a second homemade carrier may also be approved.

"We are re-looking at the design. It won't be a copy of what we have today," Verma said.

The homemade aircraft carrier, the 40,000 ton Air Defense Ship, is under construction at the state-owned Kochi shipyard. India's only aircraft carrier, INS Viraat, is due to retire in 2013.
 
.
@greyboy
now tats the way we need encouragement not hatred
i know all the things in india ar not right infact nobody disagrees from tat and we dont say we r perfect we say buy 2020 which is fancy though for me, for me india will over come its 75% of problems by 2030
 
. .
Well, I honestly didn't want to get in this messy thread but some exaggeration by chinese members makes me post this sad incident which speaks volumes of their equipment quality and Shipbuilding prowess w.r.t submarines and the very reason why their subs don't venture in deep seas regularly...
The mods can always delete this post if they find it derogatory.....



Chinese submarine 361
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ming class submarine
Career (China) Chinese (PRC) Navy Ensign
Name: No. 361
Fate: Lost 16 April 2003
General characteristics
Class and type: Ming-class submarine
Displacement: 1,584 tonnes (1,559 long tons) surfaced
2,113 tonnes (2,080 long tons) submerged
Length: 76 m (249 ft 4 in)
Beam: 7.6 m (24 ft 11 in)
Draft: 5.1 m (16 ft 9 in)
Propulsion: 2 × Shaanxi 6E 390 ZC1 diesels rated at 5,200 hp (3.82 MW)
2 × Xiangtan alternators
2 shafts
Speed: 15 knots (28 km/h) surfaced
18 knots (33 km/h) submerged
Complement: 55 (9 officers)
Armament: 6 × bow torpedo tubes
2 × stern torpedo tubes

The submarine hull number No. 361 with name Great Wall # 61 (长城61号) is a Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy Type-035AIP (ES5E variant) (NATO reporting name Ming III) conventional diesel/electric submarine. It was reported to have suffered an accident killing all on board in 2003 while at in the Bo Hei Sea between North Korea and eastern Shandong Province of China.

No. 361 was part of the 12th Brigade of the North Sea (Bo Hei) Fleet of the PLAN based at Lu Shun (formerly Port Arthur) in the Liao Ning Province.

The loss of the crew of submarine No. 361 is the worst declared peacetime military disaster in the history of the People's Republic of China.

[edit] Ming class

The Ming class of Chinese submarines are an adaptation of the diesel/electric Romeo class submarine built in the Soviet Union, which are based on the German Type-21 U-boat of World War II.

The Central Military Commission ordered the building of the Ming class submarines in 1967 as Project 035. The construction of the first began during October, 1969 at Wuhan Shipyard. The last boat was built in 2002. A total of 20 boats were built, of which 17 are left, and most serve in the North Sea Fleet. No. 361 serving the East Sea Fleet was the thirteenth and was built in 1995 making it one of the newest in the fleet.

CNN reports that China is increasing training and exercises of its submarines in the east to carry out a policy of "sea denial" to try counter the powerful U.S. Pacific fleet [1]. The location of the incident (see below), the Bo Hei Sea is very strategic for China. It is the closest sea outlet to Beijing, and one of the busiest sea routes in the world.
Bo Hei Sea
[edit] Incident

According to the official Chinese news agency, Xinhua the submarine was taking part in exercises east of Neichangshan islands in the Bo Hei Sea (渤海) of Northeastern China. [2].

On April 16, 2003, all 70 crew members of the submarine were killed when the diesel engine failed to shut down when the boat submerged and used up all the oxygen in the boat.

According to Xinhua on May 2, 2003, the crippled boat was discovered by Chinese fishermen on April 25, 2003, when they noticed the periscope sticking out. The submarine was then towed initially to Yulin on Hainan Island, and later towed back to the northeast seaport of Dalian. The submarine was drifting for ten days because it was on a silent, no-contact drill.


A number of issues arose with this incident:

* Michael McGinty, an expert on the Chinese navy at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies in London and a former British submariner[3], said "The accident likely happened while the submarine was on the surface. If the accident happened when the boat was under water, it was less likely China could have recovered it." This contradicts the official version that the submarine was submerged.

* One leading theory for the accident is called engine run-on casualty. This happens when the diesel engines are still running while the submarine is submerged, instead of switching to electric motors. This results in the diesels sucking oxygen out of the inside of the submarine, suffocating the crew. But this is dismissed because the original Russian design of this submarine has a device that cuts off diesel fuel supply to the engines if it detects a drop in barometric pressure inside the hull.

* Another theory is that seawater seeped into the batteries creating a toxic environment via deadly chlorine gas that could kill an entire crew while on the surface. Again, chlorine gas does not kill instantly. Chlorine gas also has a very distinctive smell.

* Other military commentators also pointed out that the sea water outside of the Liaodong Peninsula was only one to two hundred meters deep, which was considered shallow for a submarine.

* Also, all submarines have multiple escape hatches. So the inability of any of the crew to escape is also considered puzzling.

* The Chairman was shown visiting the submarine at Dalian during the first week of May. The submarine was very clean during the visit, which made observers wonder if it were the original.

* The usual complement of a Ming-class submarine is 9 officers and 46 crew. So the existence of 15 additional personnel onboard is puzzling, but may be related to the exercises. It has been speculated that the submarine was testing an AIP system when the accident occurred.

* When the flap valve, fitted to the snorkel which sucks in the oxygen, shuts in response to water being sucked into the snorkel it causes a temporary pressure drop in the submarine. This change in pressure is quite noticeable, for example your ears will pop and you might feel that your head is swelling. This generally can happen for short periods of time. However, if the diesel engines were running the crew would have known this was happening and should have been able to don EBS (emergency breathing system) if fitted. This is the first emergency procedure taught to new recruits to a submarine.

[edit] Impact

CMC Vice-chairman Guo Boxiong led an enquiry into the incident, which resulted in the dismissal of four senior PLAN officers, Navy Commander Shi Yunsheng, Political Commissar Yang Huaiqing, North Sea Fleet Commander Ding Yiping (丁一平), and North Sea (Bei Hai) Fleet Political Commissar Chen Xianfeng (陈先锋) on June 13, 2003. Another four senior officers were also demoted. The official verdict was improper "command and control."
[edit] Quotes

* "The officers and sailors of 361 remembered their sacred duty entrusted to them by the Party and the People. They died on duty, sacrificed themselves for the country, and they are great losses to the People’s Navy." - Chairman Jiang Zemin, Central Military Commission in a condolence message to families of the dead, 2 May 2003.

Chinese submarine 361 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hope they improve their shipbuilding and people don't die unnecessarily!!

:cheers:
 
.
^^^
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced


When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.

At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.

The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced | Mail Online
 
.
Well, I honestly didn't want to get in this messy thread but some exaggeration by chinese members makes me post this sad incident which speaks volumes of their equipment quality and Shipbuilding prowess w.r.t submarines and the very reason why their subs don't venture in deep seas regularly...
The mods can always delete this post if they find it derogatory.....



Chinese submarine 361
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ming class submarine
Career (China) Chinese (PRC) Navy Ensign
Name: No. 361
Fate: Lost 16 April 2003
General characteristics
Class and type: Ming-class submarine
Displacement: 1,584 tonnes (1,559 long tons) surfaced
2,113 tonnes (2,080 long tons) submerged
Length: 76 m (249 ft 4 in)
Beam: 7.6 m (24 ft 11 in)
Draft: 5.1 m (16 ft 9 in)
Propulsion: 2 × Shaanxi 6E 390 ZC1 diesels rated at 5,200 hp (3.82 MW)
2 × Xiangtan alternators
2 shafts
Speed: 15 knots (28 km/h) surfaced
18 knots (33 km/h) submerged
Complement: 55 (9 officers)
Armament: 6 × bow torpedo tubes
2 × stern torpedo tubes

The submarine hull number No. 361 with name Great Wall # 61 (长城61号) is a Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy Type-035AIP (ES5E variant) (NATO reporting name Ming III) conventional diesel/electric submarine. It was reported to have suffered an accident killing all on board in 2003 while at in the Bo Hei Sea between North Korea and eastern Shandong Province of China.

No. 361 was part of the 12th Brigade of the North Sea (Bo Hei) Fleet of the PLAN based at Lu Shun (formerly Port Arthur) in the Liao Ning Province.

The loss of the crew of submarine No. 361 is the worst declared peacetime military disaster in the history of the People's Republic of China.

[edit] Ming class

The Ming class of Chinese submarines are an adaptation of the diesel/electric Romeo class submarine built in the Soviet Union, which are based on the German Type-21 U-boat of World War II.

The Central Military Commission ordered the building of the Ming class submarines in 1967 as Project 035. The construction of the first began during October, 1969 at Wuhan Shipyard. The last boat was built in 2002. A total of 20 boats were built, of which 17 are left, and most serve in the North Sea Fleet. No. 361 serving the East Sea Fleet was the thirteenth and was built in 1995 making it one of the newest in the fleet.

CNN reports that China is increasing training and exercises of its submarines in the east to carry out a policy of "sea denial" to try counter the powerful U.S. Pacific fleet [1]. The location of the incident (see below), the Bo Hei Sea is very strategic for China. It is the closest sea outlet to Beijing, and one of the busiest sea routes in the world.
Bo Hei Sea
[edit] Incident

According to the official Chinese news agency, Xinhua the submarine was taking part in exercises east of Neichangshan islands in the Bo Hei Sea (渤海) of Northeastern China. [2].

On April 16, 2003, all 70 crew members of the submarine were killed when the diesel engine failed to shut down when the boat submerged and used up all the oxygen in the boat.

According to Xinhua on May 2, 2003, the crippled boat was discovered by Chinese fishermen on April 25, 2003, when they noticed the periscope sticking out. The submarine was then towed initially to Yulin on Hainan Island, and later towed back to the northeast seaport of Dalian. The submarine was drifting for ten days because it was on a silent, no-contact drill.


A number of issues arose with this incident:

* Michael McGinty, an expert on the Chinese navy at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies in London and a former British submariner[3], said "The accident likely happened while the submarine was on the surface. If the accident happened when the boat was under water, it was less likely China could have recovered it." This contradicts the official version that the submarine was submerged.

* One leading theory for the accident is called engine run-on casualty. This happens when the diesel engines are still running while the submarine is submerged, instead of switching to electric motors. This results in the diesels sucking oxygen out of the inside of the submarine, suffocating the crew. But this is dismissed because the original Russian design of this submarine has a device that cuts off diesel fuel supply to the engines if it detects a drop in barometric pressure inside the hull.

* Another theory is that seawater seeped into the batteries creating a toxic environment via deadly chlorine gas that could kill an entire crew while on the surface. Again, chlorine gas does not kill instantly. Chlorine gas also has a very distinctive smell.

* Other military commentators also pointed out that the sea water outside of the Liaodong Peninsula was only one to two hundred meters deep, which was considered shallow for a submarine.

* Also, all submarines have multiple escape hatches. So the inability of any of the crew to escape is also considered puzzling.

* The Chairman was shown visiting the submarine at Dalian during the first week of May. The submarine was very clean during the visit, which made observers wonder if it were the original.

* The usual complement of a Ming-class submarine is 9 officers and 46 crew. So the existence of 15 additional personnel onboard is puzzling, but may be related to the exercises. It has been speculated that the submarine was testing an AIP system when the accident occurred.

* When the flap valve, fitted to the snorkel which sucks in the oxygen, shuts in response to water being sucked into the snorkel it causes a temporary pressure drop in the submarine. This change in pressure is quite noticeable, for example your ears will pop and you might feel that your head is swelling. This generally can happen for short periods of time. However, if the diesel engines were running the crew would have known this was happening and should have been able to don EBS (emergency breathing system) if fitted. This is the first emergency procedure taught to new recruits to a submarine.

[edit] Impact

CMC Vice-chairman Guo Boxiong led an enquiry into the incident, which resulted in the dismissal of four senior PLAN officers, Navy Commander Shi Yunsheng, Political Commissar Yang Huaiqing, North Sea Fleet Commander Ding Yiping (丁一平), and North Sea (Bei Hai) Fleet Political Commissar Chen Xianfeng (陈先锋) on June 13, 2003. Another four senior officers were also demoted. The official verdict was improper "command and control."
[edit] Quotes

* "The officers and sailors of 361 remembered their sacred duty entrusted to them by the Party and the People. They died on duty, sacrificed themselves for the country, and they are great losses to the People’s Navy." - Chairman Jiang Zemin, Central Military Commission in a condolence message to families of the dead, 2 May 2003.

Chinese submarine 361 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hope they improve their shipbuilding and people don't die unnecessarily!!

:cheers:

Yes, accidents does happen, it happened to most countries, does

thats proved US, or Russia(your sub. supplier) ship-building ?

Please think this simple logic with your head not your !:smitten:
:pakistan::china:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
^^^
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced


When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.

At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.

The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced | Mail Online

Well if that story is true, then China probably has something better already.

Lot of work for India to match or counter those kinds of capabilities.

But i have to say, why let the cat out of the bag at all. Why not let the Americans live in ignorance of their weakness.
All China has really accomplished is triggered alarm lights all over American Strategic circles, Alarm bells that will be answered.

Could this be sign that China is moving against American inserts more openly, and head on ?
 
.
Yes, accidents does happen, it happened to most countries, does

thats proved US, or Russia(your sub. supplier) ship-building shitty ?

Please think this simple logic with your head not your A@S !:smitten:
:pakistan::china:

You can only Knock Russia around so much.

They did a lot of big things as well you know.
First satellite, first Man in space.
Your planes use their engines.
You have copied their planes.
Your entire inventory used to be Russian. or based on Russian gear.
You are basing your Aircraft carriers on the Russian STOBAR configuration.
You still rely on the Russian for natural gas.
They made the freakin AK-47

Come on seriously, I believe at the very least, That should convince you that Russians can make ships.
 
.
You can only Knock Russia around so much.

They did a lot of big things as well you know.
First satellite, first Man in space.
Your planes use their engines.
You have copied their planes.
Your entire inventory used to be Russian. or based on Russian gear.
You are basing your Aircraft carriers on the Russian STOBAR configuration.
You still rely on the Russian for natural gas.
They made the freakin AK-47

Come on seriously, I believe at the very least, That should convince you that Russians can make ships.

Cool down, my dear, read my post again, whats i saying accidents

dosn't prove shitty shipbuilding, i took US and Russia as example,

Where did i hinted they sucks ? :smitten::pakistan::china:
 
.
Hey man, wake up, thats not me you are talking about, remember

the forum rules, no personal attacks !! HaHaHa

Personally i only hate some ignorant Indians not all of you.

BTW, good luck to your future so-called global hub for warship building

dream.:smitten::pakistan::china:

U r right..I meant Shchinese...replied on the wrong post...
 
.
Ladies and Gentlemen.... and shchinese here i come to wake up my chinese friends from the dreams of self reliance and tall claims of indigenous developments.:yahoo::yahoo:

Before going further i like to clear some facts. Yes...yes ...yes India manufactures cutting edge warships and import some. And yes china also manufacture some warships and import some. Same as India, then what is the difference. Because we can import anything because we are known importer and are not shying away from it. But when chinese falsely claims and boasts about cutting edge warships 100% manufactured in China with 100% chinese parts and technologies following facts are the just tip of ice burg and punctures all your airy claims.:rofl::rofl:

Sovremenny Class Destroyer (Soviet era subs, All imported from soviets/Russia)
* Vazhnyy - Важный - Eminent (Hangzhou (136) - 杭州 - sold to China before completion)
* Vdumchivyy - Вдумчивый - Thoughtful (Fuzhou (137) - 福州 - sold to China before completion)
* Taizhou (138) - 泰州 - improved 956EM built for China. (2005)
* Ningbo (139)- 宁波 - improved 956EM built for China (2006)

China reportedly also holds the option to purchase an additional two Project 956EM in the future.
Link Sovremenny class destroyer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In 2002, the PRC signed a contract with Russia to purchase an additional two improved Project 956EM destroyers worth US$1.4 billion. The first hull, Taizhou 138, was launched in April 2004 and delivered on 28 December 2005. The second hull, Ningbo (139) was launched in July 2004 and delivered in September 2006.

The Sovremenny class destroyers provided a balanced platform that vastly exceeds the capabilities of Chinese domestic designs at the time of delivery. Their displacement exceeded that of most Chinese indigenous surface warships, indicative of the overall improvement in combat potential. The ship also has longer endurance compared to the Chinese indigenous destroyers. The PLA Navy hoped to use these ships to fulfil the gap in its combat capability caused by the delay in developing indigenous designs."

Link Project 956/EM Sovremenny Class Missile Destroyer - SinoDefence.com

Kilo Class Submarine - 2 Original Kilo, 10 Improved Kilo. All supplied by from Soviets.
Link Kilo class submarine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plz see the year 2005-2006, simple question when you have capacity why are you happyly buying soviet/russian scrap like India. :victory:


Aapka koon koon, hamara koon Paani,
Hum mare to maut, aap maro to Qurbani. (No need for translation since you will not understand it and always keep ranting)


What more proof you want, Ab kya bachche ki jaan lega???:chilli::chilli:
 
.
Well if that story is true, then China probably has something better already.

Lot of work for India to match or counter those kinds of capabilities.

But i have to say, why let the cat out of the bag at all. Why not let the Americans live in ignorance of their weakness.
All China has really accomplished is triggered alarm lights all over American Strategic circles, Alarm bells that will be answered.

Could this be sign that China is moving against American inserts more openly, and head on ?

The reason US develop Poseidon P8-A is in respond to this incident. THE USN believed that P3 Orion, designed in the 1960s, was sufficient to counter modern diesel subs. The Song class prove them wrong. With the P8-A, it should be better at countering the diesel subs. the Russians must be pissed out at the Chinese navy for doing this as this really tip off USN.

An inferor export version of P8-A, P8-I will be exported to India at 2014 or later. This sound work well against the Kilo/Song class. But I'm not sure how this will handle the newer version of Russian/Chinese subs coming out as the best way to hunt a sub is still with a sub. I had a friend that served in the USN is the early 1990s and he stated that no surface ships or planes can detect an LA class attack nuclear sub.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom